A Nixon could help save the Washington GOP from itself
Ally of Democrats, Greens, and Libertarians, unconventional Eastside legislator Toby Nixon – defeated last fall – is missed in Olympia. First urban and now suburban Republicans have become endangered in Washington state politics, and Nixon is an indicator species.
Ever think a Republican named Nixon would be missed? Neither did I. But I was surprised recently when someone from a fairly liberal public interest group told me off-the-record that they missed former state Rep. Toby Nixon, a Kirkland Republican, in Olympia. Nixon was defeated in 2006 in a bid to step up to the state Senate from his House seat.
What was the group's beef? They were having trouble finding Republican co-sponsors for some of the bills and proposals they were pushing. Even in the Democrat-run Legislature, bipartisan support is an asset in helping bills through committee and giving them an aura of seriousness, even inevitability. It can also signal that there's less risk involved in supporting a measure. The bipartisan imprimatur suggests a public good.
It's also true that many bills have no particular partisan agenda. The old saying is that there are no Democrat or Republican potholes. There are also issues that cut across party lines – issues, for example, that have to do with fundamental rights, like civil liberties.
Nixon voted against the bipartisan pork package for Boeing. He was out front in trying to block the U.S. government's implementation of the Big Brother Real ID program to make your driver's license a computer-chipped national identity card. He has supported restoring voting rights of felons who've done their time in prison. He was – and is – dogged on open-government issues. He's still co-chair of the Washington Coalition for Open Government, which is the advocate of shining the disinfectant of daylight on public process. It's the kind of coalition Toby Nixon relishes, drawing support from Democrats, Republicans, the right-wing Evergreen Freedom Foundation, labor, and the media.
Nixon's value was that he was a libertarian Republican. (Before he moved here to work for Microsoft, he in fact was an official Libertarian Party candidate for office in Georgia.) He was, and is, a conservative, but also an unconventional one. His voting record was to the right, but he also took some stands contrary to many others held by both parties. His being out of lockstep with his own party was refreshing, and often useful.
Nixon is unconventional in other ways, too. He is a Mormon convert but isn't missionary about his faith: "As a Mormon libertarian, I am no threat to anyone," he jokes over a recent lunch in one of the lodge-like dining rooms on the Microsoft campus.
The wipeout of the GOP in the 2006 election did a great deal of damage to the Republican Party locally, and much of it was self-inflicted. George Bush and Iraq dragged everyone down. It was a bad year, in some ways historically bad. But demographic trends and the state GOP drift toward extremism in an increasingly Democratic-leaning state didn't help.
GOP turnover in Seattle's Eastside suburbs was particularly notable. Recently, the place has been a hot zone of unconventional, swing-vote Rs. Slow-growth advocate Brian Derdowski was the Republican maverick of the King County Council for years, having to fight his own party and the GOP-loving development lobby to stay in office.
But it's the Eastside legislative districts closest to Lake Washington that have seen the most pronounced change. Bill Finkbeiner got into the Legislature representing the 45th District as a "Tom Harkin" Democrat, then switched parties and became a GOP leader in the Senate. Last April, he decided to get out after he bucked the majority of his party and cast a critical vote in favor of gay rights. Former state GOP party chair Chris Vance called the decision "terrible, terrible news." Then Rodney Tom, reading the suburban coffee grounds, switched parties, too, only he bolted from the GOP and ran for and won a Senate seat in the 48th as a Democrat.
The result of the Finkbeiner retirement, the Nixon loss, and the Tom switch is that the hot zone of independent-minded, reasonably moderate Eastside Republicans got royally f–, uh, fumigated in 2006. The lakefront "liberals" – with the exception of Mercer Island's Fred Jarrett – are gone.
Even the so-called suburban, Reagan-bred metrosexuals – younger, suburban conservatives who seemed tuned in to the new 'burbs – have taken a hit. Luke Esser was defeated in his re-election bid, and Dino Rossi is on political Elba, plotting his possible return to reclaim Queen Christine Gregoire's crown with the help of surviving suburban "Dinocrats."
Seattleites are probably thinking: Good riddance. The GOP in the city is extinct. The fact that an openly Republican candidate, Jim Nobles, announced this week that he was running for City Council was news in political circles because the last Republican to leave Seattle was thought to have turned out the lights not long after former Gov. Dan Evans, the ur-liberal Republican in this state, left office in 1977. As the die-off occurred, the once-solidly Republican Eastside has been swinging leftward to the middle, and now farther left, at least to a point. I noticed things had changed when I saw desperate Kirkland housewives holding Moveon.org cookie sales for John Kerry in Eastside parking lots.
Urbanization has been one factor in the swing – the Microsoft 'burbs are filled with sophisticated workers from other cities. Growth has brought on a whole raft of urban issues with which to contend. Transportation is now not just about highways but transit. The new suburbanites are often very green: They moved to a less-urban environment for a reason, often to be closer to nature. And social issues, like homelessness and housing affordability and dealing with greater racial and ethnic diversity, have put Democratic causes on the radar. Call it the Crossroads Factor.
Politicians have figured out that independent suburbanites will often reward socially tolerant, fiscally restrained, pro-business, pro-environment candidates of either party. Right now, the mo in those departments is with the suburban Dems. Think Rep. Ross Hunter, the moderate ex-Microsoftie who represents the 48th, which includes much of Bellevue, Redmond, and the Lake Washington Gold Coast. He is also widely seen as a prospect for an elected statewide office or Congress. Imagine that: a Democrat who might be able to use the crabgrass frontier as base for running for higher office. That used to be the exclusive turf of Republicans like Jennifer Dunn, Rob McKenna, Dan McDonald, or Rossi.
Mercer Island's Fred Jarrett, lonelier than the Maytag repair man, also misses Nixon. "Very much," he says. In an email response to a query about Nixon, he wrote: "One of the things many of us relied on Toby for was his keen eye and insightful analysis of bills." Nixon says his mindset as a systems analyst for Microsoft was invaluable to helping him figure out legislation and how to tweak it and work the process in Olympia. The law book is called the Revised Code of Washington, after all. Nixon's a details guy, and he clearly misses wrestling with the devil who resides in them. "He's still engaged in the process," Jarrett says. "I get several e-mails a week from him kibitzing on bills!"
But Jarrett sees ominous signs for the party if the Nixons are no longer electable: "The urban wing of the party looks like an endangered species. Republicans need to take this as a serious challenge, and it can't be attributed to chance. House Republicans have lost seats in every election cycle since 1994 and the net loss in urban areas is staggering. Nixon is an indicator species."
Polarization and partisanship is part of the cause, Jarrett says. "Our ability to maintain a stable democratic government requires that both parties have a robust, centrist core. I think we've seen the results of polarization." He looks at what the Democrats have done with envy. Seattle Democratic House Speaker Frank Chopp "has been much more successful at building that centrist core. At the expense of people like Toby. It's a loss for both the Eastside and the [GOP] caucus."
Another guy who misses the fray is new state Republican Party Chair Luke Esser, who loved his time in Olympia. "If the Legislature is a heroin addiction," he tells me over a cell phone, "I'm on methadone now." Talk about political junkies.
Esser's job is to find good GOP candidates statewide, and he, too, thinks the party has to do a better job of developing candidates and healing internal rifts. "If we don't work together as a team, we don't have a chance of a comeback." He draws inspiration from Doris Kearns Goodwin's biography of Lincoln, Team of Rivals: The Political Genius of Abraham Lincoln. The book shows how Lincoln led and eventually united a fractious group of rival Republicans in his cabinet and turned them into a winning team.
He says that Eastside Democrats are vulnerable and doesn't rule out that a Toby Nixon – even the Toby Nixon – could make a comeback. "The Democrats are extended, like Napoleon enjoying a barbecue in Moscow," he says. The victories of 2006 have stretched them into swing or GOP-leaning areas where they might not be able to hang on in the post-Bush era. They are isolated and supply lines are thin.
He cites the man who defeated Nixon as a prime example of the GOP's hopes: Sen. Eric Oemig, the former Microsoft engineer. (And yes, Eastside candidates of both parties all seem to originate at Microsoft, just like Boeing in an earlier era.) Kirkland Democrat Oemig has made pushing for Bush's impeachment a centerpiece of his rookie session in Olympia. "They think they're representing Capitol Hill," Esser says. "They're not moderate in tone or governance." He thinks they may come to pay a price with losing touch with the pragmatism of their districts.
Defeat has not slowed Nixon, however. He's working on two projects that could help heal and focus the GOP and reform King County's election system.
Nixon describes himself as a "grassroots Republican" rather than a corporate Republican and like Esser thinks the party needs to come together on ideas. He also thinks he can address some of the unhappiness in those roots regarding the 2004 election debacle.
Nixon is key organizer of Initiative 25, a drive to make the head of King County elections an elected office and to get it out of the Department of Licensing. Every other county in the state has an elected officer overseeing elections. The group pushing the initiative, Citizens for Accountable Elections, lists on its Web site supporters of the idea who include Republicans like Secretary of State Sam Reed, Democrats like State Auditor Brian Sonntag, Green Party and blackbox-voting activist Gentry Lange, and Ruth Bennett, state chair of the Libertarian Party.
It's a classic Nixon coalition, one designed to solve a problem across party lines and appeal to the grassroots. It might also channel GOP anger into a reform cause that would take the heat off of Reed, assuming he runs for re-election in 2008. (Republican Party conservatives are angry that Reed played a neutral role in state and judicial efforts to sort out the close gubernatorial race of 2004, which Rossi lost by a whisker.) The King County Dems smell a GOP plot to seize control of the electoral process and are asking Democrats to "decline to sign." Given the anger at Reed and John McKay (the former GOP-appointed U.S. attorney who was GOP-fired) over their perceived failure to pursue allegations of election fraud, who can blame them for being suspicious?
Nixon is also currently organizing something he calls the Evergreen Leadership Conference, a gathering in Richland in mid-May that would bring together grassroots conservatives and Republicans to search for common ground in preparation for 2008. The focus, he says, will be "principles, priorities, and presidential politics."
With Nixon's talent for details, coalition-building, and his strongly held libertarian principles, he brings a kind of independent thinking that the GOP desperately misses. It's not Republicanism of the Dan Evans kind exactly – not necessarily centrist – but both principled and open to finding allies to solve systemic problems and support civil liberties. And if he can help remake the GOP's suburban grassroots, Nixon might not be missed for long.
Like what you just read? Support high quality local journalism by becoming a member of Crosscut.com today!









Comments:
Posted Thu, Apr 5, 9:58 p.m. inappropriate
Nixon's Not the One: While it is stimulating to read Knute Berger, my friend and former editor, closely examining the current state of the Washington GOP, I cannot agree with the conclusions that he draws. Toby Nixon is a marginal political figure, he's not the future of anything. It is a testimony to his political skills that he survived for as long as he did in Kirkland. He did so by soft balling his radical anti-abortion, anti-gay, anti-Tent Cities, anti-regulation views--a complaint that I also have to make about Berger's article.
What does "conservative" in the case of Nixon mean? If the Nixons of the world gain power, corporations will be the ones who will be really free.
Now Nixon is still trying to re-run the gubernatorial election of 2004 in the form of a terrible initiative that would make our auditor an elected position. Republicans have never gotten over their paranoia about Ron Sims' election department producing enough votes to secure victory for Gov. Christine Gregoire. From my examination of that election, incompetence was the problem at the King County Elections Division, not conspiracy. That incompetence will not be helped by politicizing the office of auditor further.
The "coalition" that Nixon has put together to support his initiative is not impressive either. Does Berger remember the interviews we conducted as members of the Seattle Weekly Editorial Board with Libertarian Ruth Bennett and Green Gentry Lange? Both proved themselves to be fringe politicians.
Will the Republicans win back some of the seats that they lost in 2006? Certainly. Imagine what the 2010 midterms will look like if either Hillary or Obama win the presidency!
Will Nixon be among that number? Who knows. In the end, it doesn't matter because he will never be a leader of Washington's Republicans. He'll always be caught up in a wave, trying to figure out a way to survive.
Posted Fri, Apr 6, 7:46 a.m. inappropriate
Nixon Not the One for Blinkered Partisanship: Occasionally, during legislative sessions, one would see Toby Nixon sporting a "97-1" lapel pin–an honorific bestowed on him by his fellow House members when he cast the only vote against a bill.
With his bemused smile, Nixon would explain the issue and the reason for his stance against the legislation in question. But he wasn't being contrary for the sake of being ornery. Nixon has a gift for asking penetrating questions about policy that even the most silver-backed Olympia veterans and wonkish geeks occasionally overlook. When those questions weren't answered to his satisfaction, he would stick with principle and vote against the herd.
Nixon's willingness to look beyond monochromatic dogmatism occasionally has forced his fellow Republicans to question their assumptions. Take the environment, which too many loyal Republicans consider a "liberal" issue to be shunned. To the immense joy of our organization of Republican conservationists (Republicans for Environmental Protection)–a political gene pool that is down but not out–Nixon reached back to older Tory notions of intergenerational equity and made our "conservation is conservative" rhetorical tag line one of his own. Liberal conservationists should be glad. If the environment is treated as a territorial issue by partisans on both sides, the end result will be poor stewardship.
In these days of slavish partisanship among both R's and D's, Nixon's thoughtful blend of principles and public-spiritedness is urgently needed in both Washingtons. The day he returns to Olympia–perhaps to earn a few more "97-1" pins–the state capital will be a better place.
Posted Fri, Apr 6, 9:51 a.m. inappropriate
RE: Nixon's Not the One: George, I'm surprised that you would make so many assumptions about my positions on issues, seemingly based solely on the Republican label, without truly understanding where I stand. I invite you to visit my web site and tell me if my positions are as "radical" as you label them.
What is it about my votes against corporate welfare that lead you to believe that corporations would rule if people like me were in charge?
I don't deny being on the "fringe". So were Thomas Jefferson and Samuel Adams. The simple fact is that both major parties have departed far from the principles on which our nation was founded, and people committed to individual liberty, personal responsibility, limited government, and free enterprise are, well, few and far between -- amongst politicians, anyway.
Posted Fri, Apr 6, 9:54 a.m. inappropriate
Eric Oemig, the political neophyte who defeated Toby for an open state senate seat, couln't wait to get down to Olympia in order to forget about his constituents in the 45th Legislative District. Less than 30-days after taking office, he's carrying water for moveon.org, Cindy Sheehan, and the Neville Chamberlain wing of the far-left. Oemig's campaign materials talked transportation, education, health care, and other typical issues. No mention was ever made of Oemig's numero uno agenda item: impeachment of the president and vice president.
I have two sons in the military, and these young men - an army staff sergeant and a Marine lance corporal - are Oemig's constituents. They are livid that this political newby skitters around wasting their money and legislative time on an effort that's not only a threat to their safety (Don't believe me? Ask them or any of their soldier or Marine buddies who consider bogus stunts like Oemig's to be a slap in the face to their ability to do their job), but also a grandstanding stunt (editorial opinion of The Seattle Times), a distraction from the job he was elected to do (KOMO TV's Ken Schramm opinion), and foolish (The Stranger's Josh Feit, certainly no friend to anyone right of center).
Toby Nixon is unique; he thinks first, then takes a principled position. Whether it's on liberty, open government, the environment (here I differ with him from time to time), or the appropriate role of government in the lives of citizens, he's open, accessible, and honest, unlike Eric "Bait and Switch" Oemig, who should enjoy his 15-minutes of shame in Olympia since that's going to be it for him. Don't take out a long-term apartment lease, Eric, and tell the cabbie to keep the meter running...you won't be long!
I appreciate Mossback's even handed appraisal of Toby and the loss incurred not only by the 45th District, but by all the people of the State of Washington. Too often in clean sweep elections, some of the best get swept out only to be replaced by some of the worst. So it is here. Yet Toby is undeterred as he continues to advocate for issues and positions with which he has long been identified and for which he is passionately committed. You go, Toby!
Posted Fri, Apr 6, 11:44 a.m. inappropriate
RE: Nixon's Not the One: George, I'm glad you agree that the problem with King County Elections is incompetence.
Incompetence in an elections office is a terrible thing that weakens the bond between the citizens and the government. It is not partisan to want to correct incompetence in an elections office. Even those who supported Christine Gregoire should be outraged that King County's incompetence cast a shadow over her election. The incompetence is a result of the current structure of governance, where there is no real accountability. Ron Sims failed to hold anybody accountable for their incompetence or to fix the underlying problems. On the contrary, he only expressed full support in Dean Logan who got to keep his job indefinitely, and only left after he found a better paying job in California. Bill Huennekens, who was responsible for the incompetence in absentee ballot processing, is now in charge of the transition to mail-only voting.
The best solution to incompetence in government is to take the responsibility away from the incompetents and give it to somebody else. Making the position non-partisan and separately elected will make the position more accountable.
Posted Fri, Apr 6, 10:38 p.m. inappropriate
Wow.: Toby,
Did you just compare yourself to Thomas Jefferson and Samuel Adams?
Out of touch much lately?
Cheers.
Posted Sat, Apr 7, 1:42 p.m. inappropriate
Fair and Balanced News Reporting: "Does Berger remember the interviews we conducted as members of the Seattle Weekly Editorial Board with Libertarian Ruth Bennett and Green Gentry Lange? Both proved themselves to be fringe politicians."
Well I for one remember the experience. Cut-out of a vast majority of news coverage of the race, King 5 excludes me from most of the televised coverage, and against the rules they point to, excluded from both Dailies, and fighting tooth and nail for every column inch I got, only the Weekly and the Stranger even interviewed me for endorsement, and both derisively dismissed my candidacy with prejudice. Your statement here simply underlines your lack of objectivety. That's the type of "Fair and Balanced" news reporting worthy of Fox News, not alternative weekly papers.
For the record, I recall that Ruth Bennet got about 7% of the vote statewide. Which far from being a "fringe" candidate, actually qualified the Libertarians as a major party in Washington. As for my own campaign, about 27,000 voters were concerned enough with the problems we face in King County that they expressed that concern by voting.
The Green Party is growing, regardless of having the deck stacked against us from the start, and a news media that dismisses our candidates from the outset.
Posted Mon, Apr 9, 10:34 a.m. inappropriate
Correction: It was 1994: A reader pointed out that Fred Jarrett was incorrect that Republicans had lost ground in the state House in every election since 1984. Jarrett says he "misspoke" (I'd say he made a typo) in his email. He meant 1994. Thanks to the reader for catching the goof, which has been corrected in the text.