Crosscut

Reading the full, depressing report on parole supervision

The Washington Department of Corrections examination of what led to the deaths of three law officers is an account of mistakes, bureaucracy, misfortune, and systemic problems.

By Austin Jenkins

April 06, 2007.

I recently spent an evening reading the Washington Department of Corrections' 90-page report, released three weeks ago, about the recent deaths of three Seattle-area police officers at the hands of convicts on probation. Most government reports are a slog. This one is riveting and depressing. It is part keystone cops, part bureaucratic bumbling, and part unfortunate series of events. But the report also reveals systemic problems that should make taxpayers and policymakers take note.

The report tells the tale of three drug-addled criminals who were given the benefit of the doubt by the courts. They received something called the Drug Offender Sentencing Alternative (DOSA). Basically, it's a shorter prison sentence combined with mandatory drug treatment, followed by intensive community supervision upon release.

But at every step of the way, both the offenders and the system failed to uphold their end of the bargain. And those failures resulted in the deaths of the three police officers. Ultimately, the DOC report is a self-indictment and a clarion call for reform. It also shines a spotlight on Washington's byzantine sentencing and probation system.

In August of last year, rookie Seattle Police Officer Joselito Barber was killed when his patrol car was t-boned by a speeding SUV. The driver of the SUV was Mary Jane Rivas, who reportedly had drugs and alcohol in her system at the time of the wreck. Rivas had been released from prison 10 days earlier after serving time for possession of cocaine but had failed to check in with her probation officer.

Three months later, in a tragic case of déjà vu, rookie Seattle Police Officer Beth Nowak was killed on her way to work when she was t-boned by a speeding car. The driver of the car, who was also killed, was Neal Ryan Kelley. Kelley had been out of prison for almost a year after serving time for assault and auto theft. He had a history of drug use and there was a warrant out for his arrest for failing to meet with his probation officer.

Less then a month after Nowak's death, King County Sheriff's Deputy Steve Cox - a deputy prosecutor turned cop – was shot and killed by a former inmate named Raymond Porter. Porter, a self-described former gang member, then shot himself to death. Porter had served time for delivery of cocaine and escape and had a history of drug use. At the time of the shooting, Porter was wanted for failing to report to his probation officer.

Following these deaths and a public outcry, Gov. Chris Gregoire ordered Secretary of Corrections Harold Clarke to review the state's probation system. Last month, Clarke released his report. Here are the lowlights:


So far, no DOC employees have been disciplined. But since the report was issued in mid-March, there've been several developments. Secretary Clarke, under orders from the governor, issued emergency measures to beef-up the probation system.

These include:

Officials with the probation officers union have questioned some of these reforms. Also the Washington State Republican Party has criticized the Governor and DOC, pointing out that the maximum penalty for violating probation is still only sixty days in jail.

The DOC has also issued a 17-step action plan for addressing deficiencies in the probation system. It all sounds pretty bureaucratic. Stuff like: Examine and revise policies related to supervision, violation and treatment. Another: Systematically conduct an annual review of 25 percent of all cases to ensure consistent application of policies and standards.

There's also talk of big-picture reforms. For instance, Gregoire wants a new system for evaluating the risk that offenders pose to the community. In addition, she wants to simplify the rules and laws that govern community supervision. Everyone seems to agree the legislature has created a probation system that's confusing and difficult to implement. It sounds like the legislature also needs to simplify the sentencing system. Remember, the judges have a hard time figuring it out!

In Olympia, there's legislation moving that would increase the number of drug treatment beds in prison. This is part of a broader offender reentry initiative designed to reduce Washington's recidivism rate. The idea is if you help inmates transition from prison to the outside world, they'll be less likely to re-offend.

To me the real question, though, is whether the lessons learned from the deaths of officers Barber and Nowak and Deputy Cox will result in real, lasting change. Will there be the money, the political will, and the leadership to actually implement all the recommendations and lessons learned?

On a personal note, I recently did a story for public radio about a veteran community corrections officer in Tacoma named Jenny Sheridan. I wanted to see what the job's really like. My take: CCOs have a tough, tough job. They have big caseloads. They're responsible for managing criminals, many of whom are drug and alcohol addicted. Probation violations are a dime a dozen, and there aren't enough jail beds to lock up every violator. Sometimes giving a person a second or a third chance is arguably what they need. Clearly there are CCOs who aren't doing a good job. But the good ones are no doubt helping keep our streets safer and, on their best days, helping ex-cons stay clean and sober and out of trouble.

Austin Jenkins is the Olympia-based political reporter for Northwest News Network, a consortium of public radio stations in Washington, Oregon, and Idaho. He is host of "Inside Olympia" on TVW, and he blogs at WALedge.com. You can e-mail him at ajenkins@kuow.com.

Comments:

Posted Fri, Apr 6, 10:34 a.m. Inappropriate

parole madness: This has been a long time sore point with me. We spend tens of thousands of dollars keeping people in prison (also a sore point), and then release them to some poor parole officer who looks after 70(?) people. A person likely to re-commit crimes should be aware of someone constantly looking over their shoulder.

Likely violent, likely recommiters should be supervised by trained persons, not sure they need a Masters or Bachelors degree, just regular training. With 4 to a dozen clients. Intensive oversight! Much cheaper than prison, safer for our citizens.

Churches and other civic organizations could well be parole agents as a volunteer program. There should be a trained person, per above, to assist. Should violations become egregious move up to intensive professional supervision, and of course at any signs of becoming violent.

Another program similar to the Guardian ad Litem volunteers. I am really not wanting to volunteer, but my religious beliefs are strongly in favor of the Gospel, and Old Testament passages of proclaiming freedom for those held captive. I think I would be a tough minded caring person, and were my volunteering meant someone could be out of jail, prison it would be difficult to say no.
AdamRedux

Posted Fri, Apr 6, 2:15 p.m. Inappropriate

"Offender Accountability Act" is the problem: A few years back, the legislature removed from judges the ability to sanction felons who failed to comply with conditions of sentences and put that burden on the Department of Corrections. The reason was that the Department would be more likely to consider DOC resources in determining punishment for violations. Judges are less concerned about bed availability and DOC resources. While life is now easier for judges, DOC will continue to release. Under the pre-Sentencing "Reform" Act system, when judges revoked probation, the offender went to prison for the remainder of the term, subject to parole. Now it's 60 days per violation as there is no remainder of the term. And yes, the SRA has been amended so many times since the early 1980s (well over 200 times), it is painfully, hopelessly complex. And of course, it hasn't stopped. This year, the legislature is about to pass HB 1001, a tough on auto theft law, that will require tripling the value of some prior convictions, just like we used to do for drug offenses before we figured out how unfair that was.

Algernon

Posted Sun, Apr 8, 10:42 a.m. Inappropriate

It's catch and release: The task of arresting offenders who fail to comply with community custody falls largely to local police and deputy sheriffs. Offenders are frequently released, even though there are warrants for their arrest, because there is no place to hold them until DOC can pick them up. Local jails are either filled to capacity or DOC is unable to pay the cost involved.
Get out your checkbooks. We need more jail cells.

View this story online at: http://crosscut.com/2007/04/06/olympia-journal/1561/Reading-full-depressing-report-on-parole-supervisi/

© 2012 Crosscut Public Media. All rights reserved.

Printed on May 16, 2012