The Sen. Gordon Smith watch

Oregon's GOP senator is in the crosshairs, but he's got at least one thing going for him: He's an unapologetic critic of the Iraq war.

U.S. Sen. Gordon Smith, R-Oregon.

U.S. Sen. Gordon Smith, R-Oregon.

A lot of eyes – including those of pollsters and strategists working for Democrats already on the long march to 2008 – are focusing on Sen. Gordon Smith these days. The only Republican elected to statewide office from Oregon, Smith is used to serving a tricky constituency. As more than one political writer has noted, next year he will need all his GOP supporters as well as healthy returns from Portland and other Democratic pockets – a task made more formidable as the presidential race revs up and the Iraq war further divides voters. Smith, who joined those colleagues giving a thumbs-up to the Iraq war, later said he would have voted differently had accurate weapons of mass destruction info been available instead of the fantasy version. In an emotional speech on the Senate floor back in December, Smith said, "We have paid a price in blood and treasure that is beyond calculation." While many politicos on both sides of the aisle saw this more as a sign of pre-election panic than courage, a March 10 Oregonian Q&A with Smith might also be read as a refreshingly cogent response to the matter, compared to the various fumblings of certain other politicians wrestling with their early war votes. Smith says that while he would not vote to enter the conflict now, that doesn't mean he feels apologetic for supporting the war then. The decision, Smith says, "was made with the best information I had at the time, and I'm glad Saddam Hussein is gone. The world is a better place for that." Last month, Smith broke ranks with most of his colleagues to support legislation that would pull a majority of U.S. troops out of Iraq, a position that, as one Portland newspaper headline put it, was a "rare but big" split from the GOP. Before the ink was dry on the votes, political bookies were pondering the odds of a right-wing Republican whuping a guy who had the temerity to break ranks over military matters. While a small-sample poll shows more than half of both Republicans and Democrats approve of Smith's performance, there's still plenty of shifting sand, as evidenced by Oregonians in the commentsphere, including the Oregon Public Broadcasting audience. Speculation about U.S. Rep Peter DeFazio, D-Oregon, as a potential challenger to Smith has ebbed and flowed in recent weeks; most recently DeFazio appears to be resisting making any move too early.

About the Author

Kimberly Marlowe Hartnett writes and edits for Crosscut. You can e-mail her at kimberly.marlowe.hartnett@crosscut.com. She also blogs at Type Like The Wind.

Like what you just read? Support high quality local journalism. Become a member of Crosscut today!

Comments:

Posted Tue, Apr 10, 9:54 a.m. Inappropriate

Gordon Smith's Sham "Conversion" on Iraq: Gordon Smith is a very, very conservative senator who is trying his best to hide that fact from the voters of Oregon. He's seen the numbers and he knows he's in big trouble. So, long after most of America has seen Bush's war for the disgrace and tragedy that it is, Smith "bravely" comes out against it.

Smith's new stance on Iraq is all about his political survival. And he's hoping that voters won't pay attention to the fact that on all issues he's voted with Bush and supported the right-wing agenda almost all of the time. (For instance, Smith supported the positions advocated by the John Birch Society 80% of the time: http://votesmart.org/issue_rating_detail.php?sig_id=001992M)

People know cynical opportunism when they see it. Smith's days in the Senate are numbered and deservedly so.

Incidentally, the congressman from the Eugene area is Peter DeFazio, not Peter Fazio.
snesich

Posted Tue, Apr 10, 10:16 a.m. Inappropriate

RE: Gordon Smith's Sham "Conversion" on Iraq: Yes, DeFazio, of course. Kimberly got it wrong, I didn't catch it – we messed up. Apologies to the congressman and to our readers.

Posted Tue, Apr 10, 7:49 p.m. Inappropriate

Guilt by association...: So Ol' Gordo votes the John Birch ticket, and that makes him a Bircher? That's like saying being in a garage makes me a car.

Let's compare GasBaghdad Jim McDermott's record, or Tom Lantos or Maxine Waters or Alcee Hastings to the positions espoused by dubious groups on the left to see what we find.

And to go a step further, I'll bet if we dug deep enough, snesich's POV on something probably mirror's Osama bin Laden's. Does that make him a supporter of al Quida?

Guilt by association or comparison isn't evidence of anything save the accuser's willingness to engage in lynch mob thinking. Tsk, tsk...

Posted Wed, Apr 11, 9:52 a.m. Inappropriate

Watch Gordon Smith Very Very Closely: As a long time Gordon Smith observer, it's good to see Crosscut starting a Gordon Smith watch because he needs watching very closely. For example, I wouldn't go so far as to lable him an unapologetic critic of the war in Iraq. He may appear to have turned against the war but who is he supporting for the Republican nomination for president? John McCain! That should tell you a lot about how he truely feels about Iraq. His vote was a classic throwaway because he knows Bush will veto the timeline-limited appropriation bill. Smith's conservative credentials put him to the right of the very conservative, pro-war McCain. Gordon's dealing three card monte so watch for the sleight of hand.

Terry

Login or register to add your voice to the conversation.

Join Crosscut now!
Subscribe to our Newsletter

Follow Us »