They made paradise by putting in a skateboard park

The kids don't want ball fields. They want 'crete. And Portland's obliging – with three skateparks built and a whopping 16 more on the drawing board.

Pent-up boarders at Glenhaven Park in Portland. (Kimberly Marlowe Hartnett)

Pent-up boarders at Glenhaven Park in Portland. (Kimberly Marlowe Hartnett)

Close your eyes and it sounds like any other opening event. Posing, pickups, serious criticism go on in the line behind the rope. An impatient voice rises above the others: "Dude, let's get to the 'crete." That's concrete. The speaker is a 15-year-old boy, cargo shorts so long they graze his scabby shins, skateboard clamped under his arm, and he wants in. He's jammed in with hundreds of other boarders and BMX bikers outside the fence around Northeast Portland's new Glenhaven Skatepark, anxious to get past the mayor, the ribbon cutting, and roll. Mayor Tom Potter, nothing if not a quick read on the mood of the common folk, gives what has to be the shortest mayoral speech on record, wrapping up the thank-yous for the hard work on the new park in under two minutes. The subsequent rushing clack of wheels on virgin crete sounds like full thrust from a Boeing jet. This is more than a "fresh recreating opportunity," as another city official put it. (That's pronounced reck-ree-ating in the increasingly overlapping patois of bureaucrats and shrinks.) Skateboarding space is the new frontier of smart park development, and Portland is way out in front. Development of a citywide skatepark plan got real traction when a 2002 Portland parks levy first included money for such space. The payoff is visible in lunar-like hardscapes where taxpayer money backs up the usual rhetoric about providing opportunities to engage impatient young muscles and spirits. A Portland Tribune article advancing the ribbon-cutting last Friday, April 27, quoted Tom Miller, chair of the nonprofit Skaters for Portland Skateparks (also chief of staff to City Commissioner Sam Adams): "We are the first city, to our knowledge - actually, in the world - to truly have a citywide comprehensive master plan for skate-park development. It demonstrates to an underserved group that the city takes its charge, and master plan, seriously." Glenhaven cost $385,000 and is Portland's third such park. It's part of the city's blueprint that calls for a whopping 19 skateparks and smaller "skate spots." At 11,000-square feet, Glenhaven's one of the larger version, with bowls, pyramids, banks, ledges, handrails, and chutes designed for the midair maneuvers that take the breath away from less-agile spectators. Skateboarding has been big here for decades; one sporting goods trade group estimated as many as 27,000 boarders in the Portland area, a number that seemed unlikely until one witnessed the opening day at Glenhaven Park at Northeast 82nd Avenue and Northeast Siskiyou Street. Portland's first skate park, under the Burnside Bridge, is legendary among boarders around the world. Initially it was built without help or hindrance from city process. Pier Park, up north in St. John's, now enlarged and improved, reopened in October. Three more of the sketched-in parks on Portland's master-plan map are now in the works. Citizen volunteers, police, parks personnel, and private-business types formed Portland's Skatepark Leadership Advisory Team (SPLAT) and put in more than two years of time and money to get to this point. One hero of the planning process has been at it much longer: Ron Wojtanik, a Portland Parks and Recreation planner and project manager. Wojtanik has quietly been making the case for skateboard space for years. Starting during his decade as a Parks and Rec employee in Vancouver, Wash., and continuing in his six years here in Portland, Wojtanik's listened at every public meeting as a brave young person asked for boarding space paid for with tax dollars. Typically quickly followed by several people in suits saying no. "There are misconceptions about skateboarding – that a park for them will just draw drug traffic and addicts," said Wojtanik. "But that's not what happens when they're well designed and planned. We needed to listen to the fact that kids were not clamoring for basketball courts and baseball fields. They want skate parks." Nor is this strictly a kid thing. "I've seen three generations together in skate parks, all skating," says Wojtanik. Over the past few years Wojtanik interviewed parks peers in other cities, most of them with very limited public skateboarding space. He said all told him the same thing: "Do yourselves a favor. Keep adding parks. You open one and it will immediately be overwhelmed." He scouted suitable park land around Portland, and along with SPLAT and some articulate local boarders, Wojtanik helped the city create and sell the ambitious plan it is now making real. The experts – the serious boarders and bikers among the horde waiting for Glenhaven's opening – talk about public skate spaces as if they owned the land themselves, which in a sense they do. Kimberly Richards, 21, a devoted boarder since her early teens, was asked how BMX bikers, in-line skaters, and boarders can happily coexist with each other and stationary park visitors. She had a ready answer: "Yeah, it's a challenge. Sometimes there are so many people with kids, it's like daycare. You're dodging three-year-olds on your board. But, you know, I'm down with kids, BMX bikers, whatever. As long as everyone is respectful, it's good. It's all good."

About the Author

Kimberly Marlowe Hartnett writes and edits for Crosscut. You can e-mail her at kimberly.marlowe.hartnett@crosscut.com. She also blogs at Type Like The Wind.

Like what you just read? Support high quality local journalism. Become a member of Crosscut today!

Comments:

Posted Tue, May 1, 7:58 p.m. Inappropriate

Yo, that's kickin some hyberbole, wack.: The article says: "One sporting goods trade group estimated as many as 27,000 boarders in the Portland area, a number that seemed unlikely until one witnessed the opening day at Glenhaven Park ..." Uh, so 27,000 skaters were there waiting to shred at Glenhaven? A thousand? The photos for the event made it look like at most a few hundred were there -- if you count all the dwid officials desperately seeking political shrediness. I'd be a little careful with those "trade group" estimates. Skate parks are great but somebody needs to do an independent assessment of the true demand. There are plenty of competing demands for limited park space in the Rose City. Concrete skate parks are not multi-use. Grass fields are. How many lacrosse, ultimate frisbee, soccer, rugby, or other sport field players live in Portland?

dj

Posted Thu, May 3, 11:16 p.m. Inappropriate

Shreddin' numbers: Here in Seattle, skatepark promoters were claiming vast numbers of skateboarders based on data from SGMA as applied to Seattle population. Since those numbers would have meant that virtually every male under 19 in the Seattle School District skateboarded, I did some investigating and number crunching and made some phone calls. First off, Mike May, Director of Media Relations for SGMA, told me that applying national numbers to the local level is purely guesstimating, so the original number cited was very inaccurate.
The Interagency Committee for Outdoor Recreation here in Wasington State does a survey of recreation every 5 years. Their data applied to Seattle indicates that there are only 6-7,000 skateboarders, and the average skateboarder skateboards 10 times a year or an hour or two. And, yes, some kids are addicts and go every day, but for most, it's just another way to kill time until they get a drivers license or a girlfriend, or get involved in other activities in High School. In Seattle Parks, to compare some participation numbers, we have 356,000 walkers, 113,000 picnickers, 90,000 nature observers, 67,000 swimmers, and 42,000 general playground users ( and that number doesn't include public schoolground users). We also have 10,000 ice skaters, and not one free public ice skating venue. By SGMA estimates we have 27,000 horseback riders, and no longer even provide a zoo pony ring for them ( ponies went bye-bye to make room for a football sized concrete garage at Woodland Park). The numbers of field users of all types vastly outnumber the skateboarders.
Other problems with installing skateparks in Seattle Parks, in particular, include the fact that skateboarders are primarily male-94-99% in most regions. Girls and women are less than .3% ( 3 out of 1,000) of frequent skateboarders-defined as those who skateboard once a week or more by natl. stats from SGMA. Skateparks are concrete which means they take up green space, and they can only be used by the wheeled, so they displace other users of a wider demographic spread. Per the Nov 2007 study of Los Angeles Parks done by the Rand Corporation, skateparks actually reduce teen girls exercise in Parks since the girls actively avoid venues with skatepark elements. Rand also noted that the skatepark areas were much less used than many other activity areas in LA public parks.
Seattle also doesn't compare well to Portland in general Park area available. Portland has 10,000 acres compared to our 6,200 acres. Portland also has more green space since many of their schools have large grass playfields instead of the asphalt that Seattle school yards seem to revel in. Portland's housing density is also less than ours, and they have a higher proportion of children in their population. And, per national stats from SGMA, Oregon is an outlier on skateboarding-2.5 times as many skateboarders as the general US population. Seattle actually seems to have fewer skateboarders than other areas, but that may be due to our smaller numbers of children as a proportion of the city population.
It does make sense to me that smaller towns and cities, especially suburban areas might want to install skateparks, They have more kids, and they have more green space. There is also a lot less for kids to do, so it probably isn't completely unreasonable to put some skateparks in those areas. Seattle, however, has a multitude of activities for kids of all ages, many more activities than when I was growing up here. So I don't buy the argument that the boys are being deprived if they have to take a bus to a skatepark. Most of the skateboarding kids I talked to told me they actually prefer skating the streets, sidewalks and found concrete objects. That's one of the draws of skateboarding-you don't have to go to a formal set up to engage in it. The city concrete IS a skatepark already. Walker
walker

Posted Fri, May 4, 7:05 a.m. Inappropriate

Wish I'd thought of it: You raise many good points (not to mention a mountain of stats!) -- but one in particular makes a point I wish I'd considered in my story: The whole notion of boarders preferring public space vs parks, and what it means to businesses (and pedestrians) that there are places designated for board use besides the sidewalk in front of, say, my home. I wonder if this park trend will someday lead to more restrictions on boarding on public concrete? Your posting made me see some things worth covering in the future, so thanks.

Kimberly Marlowe Hartnett

Posted Fri, May 4, 7:13 p.m. Inappropriate

Skateparks are like Daycare, in more ways than one.: As the parent of a skateboarder, I have spent what seems like most of the last 6 years or so in the parking lot of skateparks, reading the Wall Street Journal.
A lot of what walker says is true- and its still, in many ways, completely beside the point.

First, we dont make public spending decisions solely on the numbers of citizens they will benefit- if we did, we would have no handicapped access anywhere, no homeless shelters, no provisions for the mentally ill, no crosswalks with beepers for the blind, and so on, as, numerically, these are all very small parts of the population, and it would be a lot easier and cheaper to just say, "screw em".

Similarly, if we only spent recreation money on the most popular sports, we would be statistically right, but still pretty poorly serving some of the most needy.

Think of skateboard parks like Head Start, or High School Counselling- a bit of money spent now, on prevention, means a whole lot less money spent later, on repairs, vandalism, graffiti removal, and arrests.
Which is not to say all skateboarders are potential criminals- but street skating, by its very nature, destroys the urban environment- it isnt called "grinding" for nothing.
My kid loves to street skate too, and he loves the idea of dodging security guards, and dangerous stunts off the tops of retaining walls, garages, and freeway guard rails.
Doesnt mean I, as a parent, wouldnt rather he was at a skate park. I drive a lot to get him there.

Skate parks may only serve a small numerical group, but its a group with a lot of affect, both physically to our cities, and mentally as trendsetters, and unfortunately, sometimes "bad boys".

These are the kids who really NEED to have a place to hang, a safe, legal place. These are the kids that are also in need of community sponsored teen centers and programs- another thing we in Seattle tend to ignore.

I recently worked on a project for a teen center in San Jose Ca.- the city of San Jose has over 30 community and teen centers, including pools, and many of them, like the one I worked on, are $5 Million dollar new buildings, with indoor sports facilities, pool tables and ping pong, after school computer centers for homework, performance spaces, regular after school classes, and a staff of several pros on hand all the time.
This is in addition to their sports fields, libraries, and other teen oriented programs.
They also have 3 city skateparks, with 7 more on the drawing board.

All of this benefits the city as a whole, not just the skateboarders.

And then, we have Seattle- with, I believe, ONE skatepark.
And 2 or 3 underfunded teen centers.

So, Portland, I salute you.
Ries

Posted Mon, May 7, 10:50 p.m. Inappropriate

RE: Wish I'd thought of it: Hi Kimberly,
Glad to give you a new take. It is something I worry about as well. There are rumors here in Seattle that Parks will eventually fence all the skateparks and figure out a method for charging fees. That is something else I don't want to see happen.
Here in Seattle, you can pretty much board anywhere you want except where it is specifically prohibited and posted. One advantage is it allows the boys to space themselves out, so they are less likely to bother others. When you cram them all into a skatepark, macho posturing and challenges can take over which can lead to fights or to kids trying stunts they aren't ready for. It tends to let the older more aggressive skateboarders crowd out the younger too since the little ones feel intimidated. We have had beatings at Seaskate, and I don't want to see kids getting killed while they recreate.
I have read a gtreat deal about siting skateparks from sites all over the world. I don't think Seattle or Portland have done careful planning, nor has either city considered the often cited unpleasant impacts. Other, smaller cities seem to be doing a better job. Up here, the big argument for putting skateparks in Parks seems to be that space is allotted for other sports, and skateboarders want their perceived share. The problem is that we don't have the green park space to accommodate everyone, so numbers do matter. Maintaining skateparks is also expensive in Seattle-one reason we may have so few official ones. We do have a multitude of unofficial frequently used sites. I haven't heard any particular complaints about damage, so I am unsure about the other commentator's argument regarding damage to public spaces. It may be we just don't have the numbers that Portland does. We do have lots of graffiti, but it happens everywhere. The skateparks are,however, a particularly well used target. And, as for giving bad boys a place to go, well, the trouble makers will make trouble no matter what you do, so I don't see that as a valid argument. We do need more teen centers and after school activities here, especially for the middle schoolers. Whether we will ever have adequate moxie to serve them is something I can not guess. Let's at least hope the kids can skate the streets and sidewalks freely as long as they don't harm or scare others. Moms can watch there as well as at the skatepark. My best to you, walker
walker

Login or register to add your voice to the conversation.

Join Crosscut now!
Subscribe to our Newsletter

Follow Us »