Norm Maleng: the sequel
What does it say about Seattle that high-profile races for City Council and King County prosecutor turn out to be elections by acclamation?
A long-running farce in London was titled, No Sex, Please. We're British. Given the absence of genuine contests in the 2007 election, we might have earned a new slogan for the city: No politics, please. We're Seattle.
Exhibit A is the City Council races, where three incumbents have no opponents or merely token ones; one incumbent (David Della) has a medium-longshot challenger (Tim Burgess); and only the open seat has a good race, with two strong contenders (Bruce Harrell and Venus Velasquez).
Exhibit B is the suddenly vacant King County prosecutor's job, which would ordinarily be political catnip for the ambitious. Granted, there are a lot of unusual features in this race. Norm Maleng, a saintly figure beloved by the legal community and both parties, held the position for 28 years until his recent and unexpected death – so long that the job has come to seem a natural monopoly for Maleng and the GOP. Accordingly, when his chief of staff, Dan Satterberg, who's held that job for 17 years, announced his candidacy, the Maleng machine as well as the Republicans immediately closed ranks around him. Maleng's widow and son said they would co-chair the Satterberg campaign, and the announcement took on the air of a royal succession.
Sentiment for a Norm Maleng: The Sequel was quite natural. Nobody wanted to risk returning the office to the kind of political machine-building of Charles Carroll, a courthouse pol who held the office from 1948-70 until being unseated by Christopher T. Bayley, who in turn installed Maleng as his chief civil deputy. If you're doing the math, that means the Republicans, increasingly endangered in Seattle, have held this office for 59 straight years. The legal profession and the business community have become fond of Maleng's style of solid lawyering, strict non-partisanship, and careful mentoring of good talent.
More than that, the GOP is so badly split these days, especially as recriminations of Bush accumulate, that it didn't want to risk a primary. Mention a divisive figure like recent former U.S. Attorney John McKay (darling of the liberals but traitor to the conservatives for his withering exposes of Bush's Justice Department), and the idea quickly died for lack of a second.
So Satterberg by acclamation it is, even though he's a political unknown. From what I could learn, Satterberg. who is 47, is completely apolitical (no one, probably not even he, knew he was a Republican until last week), an excellent lawyer, a beloved colleague, and a mean bass guitar player in the cover band called The Approximations. He's a Norm Maleng Republican, which means he'll have in his corner a broad network of lawyers and others who have convened every four years to re-elect Maleng and scare off any serious Democrats.
The Maleng machine may be one reason Democrats were deterred. Another is fallout from the Alberto Gonzales Department of Justice, which means the public is in no mood for politics in any prosecutor's office. There are only a little over two months to the primary, so any candidate with small name familiarity would be at a distinct disadvantage.
As of this moment, Keith Scully, a former deputy prosecutor, has said he will run. He is the legal director for Futurewise, an environmental group, and also recently worked as a war-crimes prosecutor for the United Nations. But Scully is not well-known and has not run for office before.
King County Council member Bob Ferguson, said to be ambitious to be county executive some day, will probably run if only to get better known (and with a ready excuse for losing, given the effusions of love for Maleng after his fatal heart attack). Ferguson is a rising political talent, though lightly qualified to be prosecutor. (Update 6/7: Ferguson won't run.) Bill Sherman, who serves in Maleng's office and ran a good race for 43rd District state representative last year, is well qualified and respected among environmentalists but relatively unknown. Mark Sidran, who is both well known and very qualified, would have been the strong candidate, but he has an intellectually challenging new job as chair of the state Utilities and Transportation Commission and seems to have taken his two electoral defeats (for mayor and for state attorney general) to heart.
That said, the non-race is very odd. Prosecutors normally go far in politics, and even the ho-hum office of Seattle city attorney created two mayoral candidates in recent memory (Sidran, who lost to Mayor Greg Nickels in 2001, and Doug Jewett, who lost to Mayor Norm Rice in 1989). The prosecutor's office is high-visibility, and you get to hire lots of eager young attorneys who become a political network when seeking higher office. It's an office subject to abuse (we'll learn more about this if the Rudy Guiliani campaign gets serious), since it can be tempting to put the cuffs on a prominent figure, even if you somehow forget to file charges a year later. Seattle is a grown-up city and there are plenty of watchdogs to curb such abuses. Nonetheless, the powers that be pretty much decided to take a pass.
Three reasons come to mind for this apathy. One is a patronizing kind of urban tokenism, letting the Republicans have one (only one) important elective office in the city, so long as they behave in a non-Republican way. Second is a generation gap in local politics, where there are few political figures in power who are grooming successors in the way that Sens. Henry Jackson, Warren Magnuson, and Slade Gorton once did. (The only one coming close is state Attorney General Rob McKenna.) Third is a waning appetite for local politics as the region's economy gets more and more global in focus. Describing California politics, New York Times columnist David Brooks coined the phrase "apathy interrupted by initiatives." Something like that disease seems to have settled in here as well.
Somehow I think even Norm Maleng would have wished for a more vigorous contest for the office to which he lent so much stature.
Like what you just read? Support high quality local journalism. Become a member of Crosscut today!











Twitter
Facebook
RSS Feeds
Comments:
Posted Wed, Jun 6, 8:02 a.m. Inappropriate
I certainly disagree with your listing Mark Sidran as even a potential candidate, but I guess it is another opportunity to publically hold him accountable for his rather poor implementation of the law - and for that matter, Christine Gregoire for appointing to his current position. (Also recently held by another disgraced Attorney, the Monorail's Anne Levinson).
There are some in Maleng's network that would take your assertions of healthy competition as blasphemy to a saint or prophet. Such an assertion alone is proof of your comments. We are all human and we all make mistakes - the only sin is failing to hold yourself accountable to correct them, not matter how few or small.
That is what it means to be spoiled. And, FWIW, it is the root of just about all evil. It is the racist who thinks he is entitled to the services of another race, an abusive husband who thinks his family are his servants, the feudal prince who goes off an a wild killing spree, or even a failed architect/artist who finds an unassailable niche in the abuse of political power.
Although I am an Independent leaning right (at least locally) a Democrat is just what we need here to shake things up a bit. I'd go so far as to say Satterburg shouldn't even run, nor should the Republican Party even appoint him.
That, for sure, won't happen.
-Douglas Tooley
Tacoma, WA
Posted Wed, Jun 6, 10:57 a.m. Inappropriate
On that account, I'm not excited by Ferguson's allegedly-forthcoming candidacy. Do we really want a county prosecutor who must re-join the bar association and cram for continuing legal education just to be eligible to run? If he won the primary, any fool could make a funny and biting 30 second spot satirizing that fact alone, and it would contrast sharply with an experienced Republican opponent.
Keith Scully is a much better fit for the job. He relishes the role of prosecutor. He moved his family to the Netherlands for a year to work on the war crimes tribunal in The Hague. And he worked in the King County prosecutor's office, working on both civil and criminal cases. He has a vision for how the prosecutor's office could become even stronger.
As it happens, he's my next door neighbor. (I can see in his window as I type; doesn't look like he's up to any trouble...) So I will admit to a neighborly bias. Yes, he's "new" to politics, but he's not new to prosecuting crime. That's what we need in the office--someone with both experience and vision. And a Democrat to boot. Check his humble website at keithscully.com, while it's still home-cooked. (I think he'll have plenty of $ soon, and it'll look professional and boring soon enough.)
Posted Wed, Jun 6, 11:21 a.m. Inappropriate
Brewster reply: I'd make one additional comment, which is that ambition for higher office can often work well with doing the current job very well. Indeed, jobs or companies that are good stepping stones, with inspiring examples of people who have moved on to the big leagues, attract very good candidates and workers. Sure, some just use it as a stepping stone, and these types usually don't go very far. And of course Maleng himself tried three times to run for higher office, while also doing a very good job as prosecutor.
Posted Wed, Jun 6, 11:42 a.m. Inappropriate
More dem possibilities: Will Darcy Burner, Judy Nicastro, Heidi Wills, or Mary Kay LeTourneau dare to file for King County Prosecutor and bring their unique dem resumes and qualifications into the race?
Posted Wed, Jun 6, 1:46 p.m. Inappropriate
The King County prosecutor will be selected by who? SEATTLE VOTERS!!! And it's a given - a divine ordination, even - that it will be a Democrat.
Is there any better evidence than this for the proposition that those in Seattle see themselves as the end all and be all and know all of everything? And that the only election that matters is the Deomcratic primary?
Sigmund Freud...your slip is showing...BIG time.
The Piper
Posted Wed, Jun 6, 2:36 p.m. Inappropriate
RE: Thoughts on the Dem candidate(s) for prosecutor: Hardly a slip, my dear comrade. I was simply ruminating about one party's candidates. There is an R in this race, and it is King County, not Seattle. Keep your powder dry. Just havin' a conversation about one party's candidates (note title of posting).
Posted Wed, Jun 6, 2:39 p.m. Inappropriate
RE: Brewster reply: Fair enough--one can have a career develop through successively higher offices. But has Ferguson learned and done all he can on the county council in four short years? Is prosecutor the next logical step? The problem is that this trajectory (staying in office just a few years to build one's resume) tends to yield policies that have short-term glitter, but sometimes hidden (or unforseen) long-term costs.
Posted Wed, Jun 6, 4:54 p.m. Inappropriate
Seattle citizens elect a city attorney. King County citizens elect a prosectuting attorney who must have the interests of us rubes out here in uninc land or Duval or Burien or even - gasp - Bellevue at heart. In other words, any candidate for King County Prosecutor better be county-wide in perspective or he or she isn't worthy of being in the race.
I don't know where Dan Satterburg lives, but Norm Maleng, a Republican, lived in Seattle. It's crass to assume that only Democrats live there.
The Piper
Posted Thu, Jun 7, 5:16 a.m. Inappropriate
RE: Thoughts on the Dem candidate(s) for prosecutor: Touche, Piper. The "Seattle voters" phrase misses the mark, indeed. It didn't carry to work the baggage you imagine, however. I'd say everything I wrote applies to the county as a whole. At the county level, it's quite true that either an R or D could well prevail. As for "only Ds" living in Seattle, that wasn't assumed; again, the comment was regarding the D cands; that's simply the topic choice, not a dismissal of other topics (e.g., the R cands).
Posted Thu, Jun 7, 2:10 p.m. Inappropriate
Simple as that, probably for at least the last 40 years, if not more.
-D
Login or register to add your voice to the conversation.