With 'nature-deficit disorder,' the decline of traditional summer camps
Hidden Valley Camp, a Northwest institution, is concerned about the future of old-school summer camps, and they're not alone. Some experts worry that a younger generation is disconnected from nature. It might be time to unplan – and unplug – the kids.
Hidden Valley Camp is a gem among the nation's overnight summer camps. It's a bit of an anachronism, too, like independent bookstores and non-chain diners and markets. Family-owned and operated and free of any religious or group affiliation, HVC is celebrating its 60th year as a place where families from around the Northwest send their kids to live in tents, hike the North Cascades, horseback on old logging roads, swim, sail, and sing folk songs.
Located in the Cascade foothills not far outside the old timber town of Granite Falls, Hidden Valley Camp is still in some respects hidden: ex-urbia is inexorably encroaching little by little, but the place is surrounded by mature second-growth forest, and there's still no cell-phone service. Kids who come to stay – sessions last up to four weeks – settle in to life without TV, Xbox, or iPod.
HVC is a Seattle tradition. Alums include Microsofties, media people, even grunge musicians. Founded in 1947 by Harry Truman (not the president, nor the curmudgeon who was incinerated at Mount St. Helens) and his wife Imogene, the camp took kids of all races, creeds, and kinds and steeped them in Northwest lore, Woody Guthrie songs, and outdoor living. Since 1973, the camp has been owned and operated by Bob and Nan McKinlay, and now their son, Todd. The McKinlays are people who have grown up in the camp business and devoted their lives to running the place with all the right values.
My sisters and I attended HVC as kids and worked there for summer jobs in high school and college. I worked for both the Trumans and the McKinlays in the early 1970s as a dishwasher, camp bugler, and group counselor. I sent my kids there, too. I still have friends that I met at HVC more than 40 years ago. The multi-generational nature of the camp is one of its irreplaceable strong points.
A few weeks ago, I received an unusual mailing from the McKinlays. Camp is about to start and the enrollment there was down for the second year in a row, and they were hoping alums could scare up some potential campers. They aren't sure why there's been a drop-off. It could be a fluke, but they noted that there's an "unfortunate trend away from traditional outdoor activities/camps." The letter went on: "Our hope is that camps like HVC aren't going to become a dying breed and lose out to the fancier more high-tech programs."
It turns out there is a lot of concern over the future of camps like Hidden Valley and, more broadly, the relationship between kids and nature. While HVC's recent experience could be a bump in the road, it could also be a harbinger of things to come.
Summer itself is under threat as school years lengthen and academic pressures mount (even school recess is becoming a relic of the past). Kids are involved more and more in year-round programmed activities. They are certainly spending more time plugged into electronic devices.
Some worry the younger generation is increasingly disconnected from nature and the outdoors. Fewer families are vacationing at national parks – attendance at some of the most popular, like Yosemite, is down 25 percent to 30 percent; backpacking is now a "graying" activity. Studies show that fewer kids are playing outdoors as yards shrink, vacant lots vanish, and families become more paranoid about abduction by strangers.
All this is the topic of a book – the must-read on the subject – by Richard Louv, titled Last Child in the Woods: Saving Our Children from Nature-Defecit Disorder.
About summer camps, Louv writes:
Not that long ago, summer camp was a place where you camped, hiked in the woods, learned about plants and animals, or told firelight stories about ghosts or mountain lions. As likely as not today, "summer camp" is a weight-loss camp or a computer camp. For a new generation, nature is more abstraction than reality.
But old-fashioned summer camps, says Louv, can "touch the heart."
And touching the heart is what Louv believes is so important about the outdoors. His own term – "nature deficit disorder" – suggests the disconnect is a pathology, but he really argues that our need to connect with nature is primal, even biological. He talks about Harvard professor Edward O. Wilson's controversial "biophilia" thesis, that we are genetically hardwired to have an affinity with nature. It argues that getting outdoors, looking at pleasing landscapes, are things deeply necessary for humans.
Louv, who spoke at Seattle's Town Hall a couple of weeks ago, has written about his ideas in various articles. If you don't have time to read the book, check this story and this interview with Salon. He also runs an organization devoted to linking kids with the outdoors. You might have trouble getting a copy of Last Child in the Woods from the Seattle Public Library: There were 50 holds on it when I checked the other day. Clearly, Louv's concerns are resonating.
Those people include government officials. As the use of public lands has slumped, the government is trying to boost their appeal to families. Both the U.S. Forest Service and the Bureau of Land Management have launched programs to get more kids outside.
The scientific community has also expressed concern about the importance of play (108K PDF) and the outdoors. As the use of anti-depressants by children increases, as obesity rises, as more kids are diagnosed with Attention Deficit Disorder, the importance of getting kids off the couch is gaining momentum in public health circles. Playing outdoors is believed to help with all of these maladies.
Of course, it doesn't take much to wake up the public nannies who want to modify our diets and behaviors for the public good. This isn't about finger-wagging, however. It is about considering more coherent public policies. Today, many conflict with one another.
One reason recess and summer are disappearing is because of the pressures for academic performance due to government programs like "No Child Left Behind." One reason natural habitat is vanishing is that our tax system encourages development and our economy relies on growth from new home sales and sprawl. Law enforcement and the media terrify people into thinking the world is more dangerous than it is – the park is a place for kidnappers, not chickadees. And too much litigation and liability make everyone so risk-averse that kids are precluded in many communities from building forts and tree houses, lest they violate housing covenants, zoning laws, or cause the occasional broken limb.
In short, "nature deficit disorder" is partly the unintended consequence of rules and regulations that have the effect of keeping people indoors and afraid.
As well intended as government programs and medical warnings are, Louv rightly, I think, emphasizes the spiritual and psychological benefits of remaining close to nature and giving kids a measure of independence. This is something that can only be rectified at the family level. It's up to us to resist the societal pressures that put the outdoors and independence on the back-burner.
I talked to Tom Nielsen, executive director of the regional Evergeen chapter of the American Camp Association, a national group that accredits summer camps. He also runs a camping program for the American Cancer Society. He says that the number of old-school, family-owned camps like HVC is dwindling, but he also points out that attendance at camps is generally up, not down. He notes that adventure camps and family camps (a newish trend) are doing well.
But he acknowledges that people today are "more couch-potatoish," and he sees the disconnect Louv writes about. He reaffirms that one of the benefits of the camp experience is that it "addresses ... the factor of people being able to take risks in their lives." That could be surviving a rope course or performing a campfire skit, or learning to spend a few weeks in a new place with new people who are not your parents.
In talking with Todd McKinlay, he notes that camps like HVC are facing more competition for kids' time. Many kids come back summer after summer, but McKinlay sees a concerning trend. "One thing we have noticed is that the younger end is less – 7-, 8-, 9-year olds – there are fewer in that range." Without those younger campers, the generational cord will eventually fray.
Louv says that it's ironic that kids today are taught more about the environment and being green than any generation before, between recycling and the Discovery Channel. Kids know more than ever about the Amazon rain forest but have almost no knowledge to catch a fish or identify a tree in their yard.
Love of nature is becoming intellectualized. We are, in effect, raising more Ralph Waldo Emersons than John Muirs – we are raising people who appreciate nature in theory but have never spent a night under the stars. Who will be the wilderness stewards of tomorrow?
Camp can be an answer to that. Writing on camp's "gifts," Louv says:
Nature-oriented camps also help care for the health of the earth; many studies show that nature play in childhood is the chief determining factor in the environmental consciousness of adults.
I am not anti-computer gaming; I have seen the benefits of it in my own family. It can open wonderful imaginative worlds, improve hand-eye coordination, even lead to high-tech employment.
But also having some exposure to the "vigorous life," as Teddy Roosevelt called it – sleeping outdoors, getting the pants scared off by a campfire story, hiking to a pristine alpine lake, learning to live with a group of strangers in a tent, sharing in chores, being away from parental supervision, taking care of a horse, playing impromptu games of capture the flag – these have lasting benefits. Even if you never hike or camp again, these experiences can satisfy like a good story. A story you yourself are living.
Not all outdoor activities and organizations are positive for everyone. I loved my times at HVC but hated my paramilitary years in the Boy Scouts. But great programs can be transformative – OK, even lousy ones can. But as Louv points out, even if you can't afford or don't have time for old-fashioned summer camp like HVC, the benefits of being a well-nurtured biophiliac can be had through de-programming. Finding a park or green space and letting kids loose is a simple act that could be our salvation.
Like what you just read? Support high quality local journalism by becoming a member of Crosscut.com today!









Comments:
Posted Tue, Jun 12, 7:27 a.m. inappropriate
Kids today...: It's sad to see that our kids aren't getting as much exposure to the outdoors as we were when we were younger. Not only do the gods of commerce demand that we are insecure in order to sell us more stuff, they demand that we spend our time doing things that will earn us the money we'll need to buy more stuff.
We're also raising a generation of adrenaline addicts who can't look at a mountain slope without wondering how to go down it quickly, whether on a board or a set of wheels. We're increasingly disconnected from the world around us as we sit in our own private worlds where we confuse thrill with accomplishment.
Posted Tue, Jun 12, 10:23 a.m. inappropriate
it's not vigerous life: TR's goal was to live a "strenuous life"
Posted Tue, Jun 12, 3:37 p.m. inappropriate
RE: it's not vigerous life: Your're right it's not "vigerous [sic]." Teddy Roosevelt did promote the "strenuous life" in a book of that name. I took the "vigorous life" phrase from a Smithsonian website, and would point to this quote from a TR speech on the subject, which makes my point: "In the last analysis a healthy state can exist only when the men and women who make it up lead clean, vigorous, healthy lives; when the children are so trained that they shall endeavor, not to shirk difficulties, but to overcome them; not to seek ease, but to know how to wrest triumph from toil and risk."
Posted Tue, Jun 12, 6:18 p.m. inappropriate
Camp Culture: What a delight to see HVC mentioned in these pages. Our son will return there this summer as a "CL" (camper leader). He now carries 7+ years of the HVC tradition; seemingly in his very DNA. The intangible benefits of campfire sings, horse-stall cleaning, reveille, diving in frigid Purdy Creek, hiking up to Crazy Alice's, meeting young people from all over (HVC attracts some overseas clientelle) and forming relationships with people across several generations are hard to calculate, but easy to appreciate. The camp culture relies on self-propagation. It is disturbing the think that declining attendance at the younger age level could break the continuum. HVC and camps like it are oases from the clutter of consumer culture. They demonstrate in real time that other ways of living are possible and necessary.
Posted Tue, Jun 12, 7:36 p.m. inappropriate
It's ironic that about half of King County is locked up...: ...through GMA mandates that protect open space and "resource" lands such as farmland and forests, and in National Forest & Park Lands; yet because we have a sardine mentality in Seattle, kids don't know know nature.
My own acid test for knowing nature is this. Have you ever climbed a tree? Do you know what it's like to climb to the top and then survey all that you can see? I spent my childhood climbing trees in the back yard, and wondered about the city kids from Seattle who visited and couldn't climb a tree to save their lives. And now, this anti-nature lifestyle is even worse, because "environmental" seems to mean "I live in a concrete-only city where the environment has been degraded AS A MATTER OF LAND USE POLICY, and I'm happy to live in this environment. Please preserve our salmon buffers so that we have fish we can kill and eat."
Note that our land-use policies don't encourage climbing trees, don't encourage back yards, and don't encourage being outdoors in all the nature that we preserve. In general the GMA is anti-park and anti-recreational fields, since these are not legally "resources" such as farmlands and forests and gravel pits and so-called "critical areas" such as wetlands and steep slopes and wildlife habitat and salmon stream buffers (which makes virtually all of nature "critical.")
I used to think that the meaning of "critical" had something to do with the term "critical condition." Apparently it means that if we don't preserve all possible land now then people will actually own it and live on it and use it, so it's "critical" that we stop them before it's too late.
Some of the actual results of the GMA (as opposed to its intended result which is to preserve certain sorts of land and manage population and infrastructure growth away from those lands) include:
- lots of HUGE expensive homes,
- lots of zero-lot-line development with virtually no open space,
- lots of couch potatoes playing video games driving childhood obesity,
- lots of dual-income couples with enormous incomes owning enormous homes but living in them only fleetingly,
- lots of tent cities,
- lots of unaffordable housing making windfall profits for owners who did virtually nothing to deserve those profits,
- lots of property taxes for government, who did implement the policies that now make homes unaffordable, and
- lots of open space and nature available accessible only by getting on a freeway and driving far away from where one lives.
The net result is that people are more and more separated from nature even as we preserve more and more. People are no longer part of nature, part of the ecosystem, part of the ecology, or even part of the world. They're just an invasive species that ruins habitat for all God's creatures. That's the government view and unfortunately the environmental view. Keep people and the pure clean environment separate. Me personally, I like backyard with trees.
Posted Wed, Jun 13, 8:26 a.m. inappropriate
RE: It's ironic that about half of King County is locked up...: Not sure your thoughtful and voluminous comment meets the "c'mon guy, stay at least two-fifths on topic" rule.
Posted Wed, Jun 13, 9:35 a.m. inappropriate
The Piper
Posted Wed, Jun 13, 5:09 p.m. inappropriate
RE: it's not vigerous life: Well, however its spelled, I was always more familiar with 'strenuous life' being associated with Roosevelt. After all, the name of Roosevelt's (my alma mater) annual is "strenuous life".