Our Sponsors:

READ MORE »

Our Members

Many thanks to

Mickey & Jeanne Eisenberg

and

Jonah Christian

some of our many supporters.

ALL MEMBERS »

In politics, too much virtue can be a problem

In local and presidential politics, it's admirable to proclaim yourself a different kind of candidate and work to achieve that. Just beware that you've sent an invitation to reporters to hunt for perceived contradictions.

King County Acting Prosecutor Dan Satterberg. (University of Washington)

King County Acting Prosecutor Dan Satterberg. (University of Washington)

Dan Satterberg might have thought he had an inside advantage and was cruising to succeed the late Norm Maleng as King County prosecutor, just as Maleng had succeeded his boss, Chris Bayley, years earlier. But if so, he got a jolt from the banner headline in this morning's Seattle Post-Intelligencer. The P-I reported that Sally Bagshaw, chief of the civil division, was soliciting endorsements on behalf of Satterberg, Maleng's chief of staff and now acting prosecutor. There's nothing illegal here, so what's the fuss? Bagshaw was making the requests on her own time and without using a county computer for her e-mailing. The answer is that Satterberg has been caught in a claim to high moral ground. Nothing is more tempting to political journalists than finding smudges on a campaign photo. Just ask Barack Obama, who was skillfully maneuvered into admissions of error by Hillary Clinton's campaign. It's admirable to proclaim yourself a different kind of candidate and work to achieve that. Just beware that you've sent an invitation to reporters to hunt for perceived contradictions. In Satterberg's case, he proclaimed his desire to continue Maleng's policy of keeping the office free of political influence. According to the P-I, on June 4 Satterberg told the office staff:
I will be proud to continue the policy that Norm established to not permit members of the office to either contribute money or a personal endorsement to my campaign. ... It is best for the office for employees to remain above politics.
It's that last sentence that now haunts Satterberg. The P-I sees a contradiction, but Satterberg and Bagshaw do not. Maybe we need a lawyer to sort this out, but Bagshaw said she was just doing what she did previously for Maleng without controversy. The issue is heightened by criticism of these solicitations by a rival, Bill Sherman, a deputy in the office who's on leave to run for prosecutor. Also, the P-I notes that many of the law firms approached by Bagshaw get business from the civil division. A similar scenario played recently in the presidential campaign, where Barack Obama has called for an end to attack politics. Clinton wants to pull Obama down from that high ground. One way is to demand that Obama "distance himself" from this or that, and ensnare him in controversy. Clinton played that tactic effectively when a former supporter, entertainment billionaire David Geffen, made nasty remarks about Bill and Hillary Clinton. Rather than deal with the substance of Geffen's criticism, the Clinton campaign changed the subject by calling on Obama to disavow Geffen and return a donation. It worked. At subsequent campaign events, Obama had to explain why he wouldn't criticize Geffen while Clinton said she wanted to run a positive campaign, stealing her rival's issue. More recently, the Clinton campaign got another chance when it received a copy of an Obama campaign memo referring to "Hillary Clinton (D-Punjab)" and her financial ties to India. Opposition research is standard stuff, but Clinton's campaign saw an opening and released the memo to reporters. That forced Obama to call the memo "a dumb mistake" and not reflective of his own relationship with the Indian-American community. Clinton is trying to put Obama in a box where he can't say anything negative about her for fear of violating his own principle. Perhaps the greatest example of a politician twisting on his rhetorical petard was presidential candidate Gary Hart, who in 1984 encouraged reporters to investigate his private life. In short order, a photo emerged of him with a woman (not his wife) sitting on Hart's lap on a boat aptly named Monkey Business. While Clinton seeks to smudge Obama's image, she also is working to polish her own, especially among those who see her as calculating and ruthless. What better way than to make fun of that image with a video playfully comparing herself to Tony Soprano? Back in Seattle, Satterberg is on the defensive, saying Bagshaw's solicitations of endorsements and donations by law firms are appropriate. This might be a one-day story, or Satterberg might feel pressure to make a change. There's an old maxim in politics: When you're explaining, you're losing.

About the Author

O. Casey Corr is a Seattle writer who has worked for The Seattle Times and the Seattle Post-Intelligencer. He now is employed at Seattle University as director of strategic communications. You can e-mail him at casey.corr@crosscut.com.

Like what you just read? Support high quality local journalism. Become a member of Crosscut today!

Comments:

Posted Mon, Jun 25, 3:49 p.m. Inappropriate

Winning and Losing: It is truly a shame that all of us win when our County lawyer, the prosecutor as well as the civil attorney for the County, lose.

I am reminded of lobbying regulations in Olympia - which as I understand it, have absolutely no impact to any of the many members of the legal profession serving in the legislature. Need to buy influence? Use a lobbyist and it will work, but if you hire a lawyer/legislator no one will even know what is going on.

I think providing funding for the Executive and the King County Council to hire their own personal legal representation might well be a good thing. If you can't fire your lawyer are they really working for you?

-Douglas Tooley
Tacoma, WA

Posted Tue, Jun 26, 3:01 p.m. Inappropriate

P/I manufactures another non-story: Has Bill Sherman hustled for support any lawyers either inside or outside the prosecutors office?? Last week the dems fired a shot about the Maleng campaign funds. Seems the P/I and dems are working together to create sideshows to the main event of lousy qualifications and motives for the office by the 2 dem candidates. More broadly, it would be helpful if the media shared its secrets about their pet/favored officeholders; ie who are the alcoholics, drunks, scofflaws, cheats, scammers, double-dippers, hypocrites, liars, etc. The P/I has attacked Tim Eyman, Dave Reichart, Dino Rossi, and Dan Satterburg. Do they 'investigate' any dems or give them all a pass??

animalal

Login or register to add your voice to the conversation.

Join Crosscut now!
Subscribe to our Newsletter

Follow Us »