More controversy over replacing the 'historic' Denny's
While research on architectural significance continues, the condo project slated for the site in Seattle's Ballard neighborhood is coming under fire.
Curt Pryde, principle of Pryde-Johnson, the developers of Hjarta condominiums directly west of the Ballard Commons, said Rhapsody should work with the community to create a "vibrant pedestrian space."
"We don't think that's being sensitve to the community at all," Pryde said. "It's just not good urban planning and it's not good design."
Pryde also said the developers should take extra care, given the significance of the location as a "gateway to Ballard."The controversy over traffic is ironic, since such urban densification efforts are supposed to make the neighbs more walkable, not less. And presumably, a less car-centric design would be one of the mitigating benefits – if there are any – of tearing down a historic structure from the auto era. One reader comment to my original story that typified this point of view: "The preservation I support is the preservation of dense, walkable neighborhoods and nice buildings, not the preservation of parking-side sprawl or archit[ect]ural genres." That, of course, presumes that the new development replacing the old is a paragon of pedestrianism. The building's historic status is also going to be under review. In response to my story, the modern architecture preservation group DoCoMoMo WEWA issued a statement from the group's secretary, Eugenia Woo:
Docomomo WEWA Board members have read Knute Berger's recent Crosscut article with keen interest. He's raised some important points about historic preservation of the recent past, and we're pleased that others are interested in this issue. We understand that the Ballard Mannings/Denny's building was part of the former Monorail project properties, and was recently sold to a private developer. Currently, there is no demo permit issued for the building. If one is applied for, it will likely be part of a new project proposal that would require SEPA review/MUP permit that might require a landmark nomination to determine if it meets the City's landmark designation criteria. The City can better clarify the requirements for review on the SEPA issue.
As an interested party, Docomomo WEWA will review and comment officially on the building's significance at that time. Having seen the building in its current state we know that some changes have been made to it. Its design is similar to another restaurant building at the Seattle World's Fair. We are intrigued that the building is reported to be the work of well-known California Modernist, architect Charles [sic] Mayhew. Clearly there is more research to be done.Woo is reportedly leaving no Moons Over My Hammy unturned in her research. She recently ate (!) at the Ballard Denny's while gathering information on the building. No greater sacrifice can be made in the quest to preserve our modern architectural legacy.
Like what you just read? Support high quality local journalism. Become a member of Crosscut today!










Twitter
Facebook
RSS Feeds
Comments:
Posted Wed, Jul 11, 8:25 a.m. Inappropriate
_: You're right, a drive-through isn't walkable or urban, and I wouldn't support that part of the project.
Posted Wed, Jul 11, 9 a.m. Inappropriate
Homes, gardens, and our vibrant community have been very nearly wiped out on the western end of Market and precariously close to Old Ballard--replaced by fiberboard and corregated-siding monstrosities ($500,000 per unit tenaments), (ok...some have fake brick facades, too, but still...) chain franchises and (even more) nail salons. Let the (un)developers move on to the eastside where perhaps they would fit in a little more.
When is Nickels' term up, anyway? Do you think there will be any Seattle left by the time he's out of office?
Posted Wed, Jul 11, 9:38 a.m. Inappropriate
Keep an eye on DocomomoWeWa and it's all-volunteer cadre of preservationists. I believe they're on the leading edge of a coming wave of progressive-minded Seattleites who are appalled at the city's disrespect for its recent past. Readers may be interested in my article in the current issue of Seattle magazine on modernist architecture worthy of preservation. Researching the article opened my eyes to the newest threats to Seattle's identity.
Posted Wed, Jul 11, 10:15 a.m. Inappropriate
RE: No More Ballard "Developers". Period.: Oh noes!!1! Teh developers!!1! New people moving to mah nayborhood!!1! I is freaking out!!1!
Posted Wed, Jul 11, 3:58 p.m. Inappropriate
I recently moved to a Senior Housing Bldg. on Market St. My daughter lives near,hence the move here. My girls lived here in Ballard in the 70's & early 80's. I remered the Ballard of those days,my daughter warned me things were different now.
I had no idea how diffrernt ,I would find the much loved Ballard of days gone by. I use a walker to be more mobile these days. If those in charge of making this new Ballard more pedestrain friendly. It certainly does not include Seniors or any one with a mobility deficit.
Too much of the beautiful old homes are replaced with these monsters.no greenery or flowers. Too many of the neat old bussiness bldeg's, gone. Now
that neat old Dennys Bldg. is threatened.
Is Ballard to soon not be distinguishable from downtown Seattle? There must be other neighborhoods that need more condos!
Posted Wed, Jul 11, 5:27 p.m. Inappropriate
Close, but no designation: Current city land use law requires automatic landmarks review of buildings slated for demolition. Mr. Berger's original piece included enough interesting points that I think the Ballard Denny's would be nominated for landmarks protection, but it is simply not a significant enough structure to be designated as a historic landmark. A better preservation tactic would be to buy the building, but I doubt it's for sale.
Posted Wed, Jul 11, 5:44 p.m. Inappropriate
This is why it's important to keep old trees when building new buildings.
In this case, the Denny's would be no great loss. Googie architecture or no, it's not that special.
But a condo building with a drive-through would be no benefit, either -- what's the good of having a bunch more people in the neighborhood if they have to fight through a line of cars to walk anywhere?
Posted Wed, Jul 11, 5:59 p.m. Inappropriate
Speaking of which, a day like today is a great reminder that every street ought to be lined with big huge shady ones. Trees I mean.
Posted Wed, Jul 11, 7:34 p.m. Inappropriate
The Piper
Posted Thu, Jul 12, 11:05 p.m. Inappropriate
Neighborhoods all through out the city, will have nothing different about them, no character, no ethnicity, all homogenized, nothing differnet, nothing special. Boring condos ,as tall as the city will let them build.
Posted Fri, Jul 13, 9:57 a.m. Inappropriate
I propose relocating the Copper Gate tavern to this historic building and redecorating it as a proper viking long-house. Maybe change the name
to Heorot. Extend that long-ship bar, and make Ballard's gateway what it should be: a giant Viking-themed drinking establishment. Of course this
is already one of the few Dennys' with a lounge, so we've got a pretty good head start.
Login or register to add your voice to the conversation.