The $29.6 million semi-secret on the shores of Seattle's Lake Union

Though it's hard to see and get to, for now, a pretty nice new park is taking shape in south Lake Union, mercifully spared in the wars over city investment in that neighborhood.

An artist's conception of the new south Lake Union park

An artist's conception of the new south Lake Union park

Seattle's newest park, taking shape on the southern shore of Lake Union, is the Great Civic Debate we forgot to have. The park has all the ingredients of a free-for-all: tax dollars going to a project that at least indirectly benefits a wealthy developer (Paul Allen), a beloved old thing a vocal group wants to save (the schooner Wawona), an historic building with an uncertain purpose (the former Naval Reserve Building), a big project cost and a skeptical press that hints of outwitted city officials. The combined elements could have been another chapter in the Seattle Process, but this park is the little engine that could. It keeps going. The first phase of 12-acre Lake Union Park opens by December, with the entire park completed by 2010. If you don't know about the park, that's no surprise. Maybe next to Terry Pettus Park in the Eastlake neighborhood, it may be the city's most forgotten waterfront, obscured for years by construction gear and trucks. Even if you know about it, it's tricky to get there. You cross dangerous Valley Street, a mini freeway for cars headed west to Seattle Center and Queen Anne. Last week, Group Health chipped in $100,000, according to the Seattle Parks Foundation. Another much bigger donation will be announced soon, bringing total fundraising to nearly $18 million. Taxpayers contributed $9.6 million of the overall $29.6 million budget for the park. The fate of the Wawona, which has been told to move, is uncertain but the Naval Reserve building will be occupied by the Museum of History and Industry. MOHAI's arrival is a two-fer, settling what could have been a rancorous debate about the naval building and averting a wrongheaded move by the museum into the belly of the state convention center. The cost to overhaul the naval building and install MOHAI's exhibits is roughly $35 million. So Seattle gets a new park at south Lake Union. And to think it only took a century since the Olmsteds suggested the idea. Remarkably, the project takes shape while controversy still flares over a road project that is critical to the park's design: moving thousands of cars off Valley Street, the park's southern border and planned gateway. Fixing Valley involves routing most of those cars through a redesigned Mercer Street. A quieter Valley becomes a more attractive edge and access point to the park. Excitement about the new park has been eclipsed by the larger debate over the $119 million Mercer Corridor Project, which some have called too expensive and too generous to nearby developers, especially Paul Allen. And yet at some point we have to put down our sabers and recognize a good thing, a welcome contrast to recent fiascos (Sonics, Monorail, Viaduct). Please sign the thank you card to the Seattle Parks Foundation and its energetic executive director, Karen Daubert. A video on the foundation's website gives a nifty "fly over" of the park's design, which shows the MOHAI building (scheduled to complete refurbishment by 2011), a place to launch small watercraft, a model boat pond, a 300-foot "interactive" fountain, boardwalk and bridge. Walkers, sitters, and boaters enjoy the waterfront on a sunny day. The scene is welcoming, though perhaps restrained and almost corporate in its formality. Please add some frivolity and maybe a Frankfurter stand. Knowing the effect that hot weather and nearby water has on Seattle residents, I noticed something missing in the generic crowd of park users. Not a single swimmer. A foundation spokesman told me that swimming probably would not be encouraged because of toxins in the lakebed from past industrial uses. Sorry, I don't care. On some summer day a few years hence, I'll be there with a towel, glad this was one civic debate we never had. UPDATE A few budget numbers in this story have been corrected. Also, the Parks Foundation says the flyover video shows something that could be a Frankfurter stand. We report, but you decide. Check out the video and see if you can find your Bockwurst.

About the Author

O. Casey Corr is a Seattle writer who has worked for The Seattle Times and the Seattle Post-Intelligencer. He now is employed at Seattle University as director of strategic communications. You can e-mail him at casey.corr@crosscut.com.

Like what you just read? Support high quality local journalism. Become a member of Crosscut today!

Comments:

Posted Mon, Aug 27, 9:35 a.m. Inappropriate

Park, Mercer: I love the park design, There's just something about quiet coves, bridges over water, trees, and being eye level at Lake Union.

I'll certainly use the park. That area is pretty inhospitable to pedestrians these days, but even now I go through pretty often, as the trip around Lake Union is one of my favorites.

The Mercer fix is important to me though I don't drive. Making Valley nicer is a big part. Improved pedestrian connections across Aurora is another (depending on which option is adopted). Going north-south, I'd much rather have a boulevard with a median to cross, and to do it once, vs. crossing two nightmares like we have today. Also, as a frequent user of the Mercer underpass, I'd like walking along all of Mercer to be a better pedestrian environment, which apparently a rebuild would solve.

This article isn't about Aurora, but I'll bring it up anyway. It's tragic that Aurora has cut neighborhoods in half, and I'd love to see them reknitted. But if we're not going to do that, how about a couple skybridges around Thomas and Roy? (And continue that corridor from the proposed skybridge at Myrtle Edwards all the way through to crossing I-5.)

(As usual, my disclosure: I work for a general contractor that builds projects in SLU. Also, I volunteered for the Seattle Commons then spent years on the staff.)
mhays

Posted Wed, Aug 29, 3:35 a.m. Inappropriate

Seattle Seaport: For some of us, Lake Union Park is not "forgotten waterfront" but the latest take on a park that was proposed a couple of decades ago as Northwest Seaport Park. Since those early days the turf at South Lake Union has been buffeted by more than a few changes in the cultural identity and civic leadership of Seattle.

From the first major grant from the Krelsheimer Foundation for the building of the Historic Ships Wharf, stakeholder vision has been focused on our shared regional identity as a seaport community.

Personally I see Lake Union Park as a proverbial "canary in the mineshaft" for the future of Seattle as a liveable community. If we treasure Seattle's image as a seaport then it follows that we have a responsibility to act as stewards for our waterways, history, and future growth.

The hull of the Wawona might distress some visitors, but many of us have followed the story of the renovation and return her sister the CA Thayer to the waterfront in San Francisco. San Francisco leaders clearly see the cultural and financial gains that come from heritage tourism. San Francisco has again demonstrated the right way to manage cultural resources. The Seattle City Council sees the wisdom in preservation as a tool for a better quality of life for local residents, and the wonderful financial gains that made by other cities that commit to that priority. It would be nice if Mayor Nickels and his friends had the same vision.

Dugout canoes, heritage vessels. Lake Union Park offers the opportunity for sailing, paddling and the great maritime stories of people like Tugboat Annie, "Matt" Peasley and a host of other working people who once upon a time built the romance of Seattle's waterfront. I'd hate to see any of that character disappear.

There has to be a way that developers can discover a way to make money by recognizing the value of Seattle character.
Pinko

Login or register to add your voice to the conversation.

Join Crosscut now!
Subscribe to our Newsletter

Follow Us »