go to mobile version »

Arts Beat »

 
Luciano Pavarotti.

Luciano Pavarotti.

 

Speight Jenkins remembers Luciano Pavarotti

Despite some mistakes in his later years, says Seattle Opera's director, the ultimate Italian lyric tenor had the single most vital characteristic of greatness: a voice that cannot belong to anyone else.

The first time Luciano Pavarotti astonished me was in 1972 in Philadelphia. My wife and I had gone there from New York to hear Beverly Sills as Elvira in Bellini's Puritani. Pavarotti was Arturo, one of the most difficult roles ever devised, with high Cs, C sharps, and several D's. No disrespect to Ms. Sills, but he took the performance and totally transfixed the audience. What we heard that night and for the next two-plus decades was the ultimate Italian lyric tenor. Sunshine poured through the clear, perfectly pitched voice. High notes rang easily and true, and his musicianship was extraordinary. He made one smile or gasp just by his ease of delivery. His fullness of sound in all his vocal registers differentiated him from many great lyric tenors who sing the notes wonderfully but much more lightly and without the even projection.

His Metropolitan Opera debut as Rodolfo in La boheme had come earlier, in the fall of 1968. He had come from San Francisco, where he had caught a cold. I remember going up to the standing room on the Grand Tier level and listening only to the first act. It was good but not the voice that I would hear in Philadelphia. Pavarotti followed in the tradition of many great tenors, from Enrico Caruso on, in giving a good but not spectacular performance for his Met debut. The first spectacular Met night came about a month after the Puritani, when he joined with Joan Sutherland for a Daughter of the Regiment. As the artist London Records dubbed "The King of the High C's," he easily knocked off Tonio's "Pour mon ame" with its nine high C's. What was important to me was the melting beauty of the character's lyrical aria.

From the beginning, his was a voice that implanted itself in the listener's memory. How this happens is one of the mysteries of opera, but to me it's the most vital characteristic of greatness: a voice that cannot belong to anyone but its owner. Pavarotti's voice, once heard, could neither be forgotten nor confused with anyone else's. It was not the voice of Jussi Bjoerling, Richard Tucker, Jan Peece, or Carlo Bergonzi: It was only the voice of Luciano Pavarotti.

As the years went on, the high notes were not quite so easy, and roles that demanded high Ds and a lot of C's dropped out of his repertory. He made the decision to move to heavier parts, keeping always the lighter Nemorino in The Elixir of Love as a trademark role. The heavier parts were sometimes great for him: Certainly Cavaradossi in Tosca and Calaf in Turandot were extraordinary. Though Calaf had been the property of more dramatic voices, Pavarotti made "Nessun dorma," Calaf's aria in Act III of Turandot, his theme song. In so doing he overturned a half-century tradition. From the teens of the century, when Caruso recorded the sad clown's aria from Pagliacci, "Vesti la giubba," this had been opera's theme song. Now "Nessun dorma" spells opera to the general public. It might be hard for any opera lover under 40 to believe that "Nessun dorma" was not often heard until Pavarotti made it his own.

Some of his adventures were ill advised; he stretched his lyric tenor too much in Aida, and his Otello was a mistake. But in 1982, James Levine induced him to learn Mozart's Idomeneo. He conquered that florid part brilliantly, showing his musicianship and his great finesse. No composer exposes weaknesses in a singer like Mozart, and as Idomeneo, Pavarotti seemed to have none. Those performances are some of my most treasured recollections of his art.

He gave stunning recitals – two or three programs often repeated – but to hear him in the 1970s sing in a room as large as the Metropolitan Opera was unforgettable. By then his clutched large handkerchief had become part of the Pavarotti persona, and audiences loved it.

As a man, he only presented the persona of the cheerful, lovable Italian tenor to the public. He became a legitimate media star, appearing on Johnny Carson's show and all the television networks. He made a movie. He and his handkerchief became synonymous with opera all over the world. But at least in interviews – and I conducted quite a few of them with him – his undeniable charm never revealed much about himself. Unlike most artists I have known, there was no private side available. Most singers talk to their colleagues or to friendly press privately, off the record. Not Pavarotti. I can say nothing more about him personally than can those who have read what was written about him in the press, something that I would not say about any opera singer of the last 35 years who has had a major American career.

1 | 2 next page

Like what you just read? Support high quality local journalism by becoming a member of Crosscut.com today!


Comments:

Posted Wed, Sep 12, 11:40 a.m. inappropriate

Nessun dorma comparison?: This was a fine personal memory piece about LP. I wonder if you would do a quick comparison for me. A few years ago when Franco Corelli died, I was driving across the I-90 bridge when NPR played Corelli singing Nessun dorma. It was so beautiful, it brought tears to me eyes. This week I am hearing LP everywhere doing his wonderful version of it. How would you compare those two voices? What distinguishes Corelli's interpretation from LP's? I am not asking for a better/worse response but for a characterization of the two tenors in presentation of the same superb aria.

Posted Thu, Sep 13, 12:10 p.m. inappropriate

Pavarotti's distinct voice: Thanks for this remembrance, Mr. Jenkins. As much as I love opera, I doubt I'll ever be able to listen to a recording and say -- as the experts do on the Met opera quiz -- that that's Tebaldi, or Moffo or Corelli. But Pavarotti's voice, as you note, is undeniable.

As much as we may cringe at some of his excesses, Pavarotti surely brought more people to appreciate a great operatic voice. And building the opera audience is to be applauded, no matter the methodology.

Posted Thu, Feb 21, 11:17 a.m. inappropriate

Nessun dorma comparison?: I am not a opera critic. I just listen and offer what I hear. LP's voice was soft and FC's voice was what I would describe as crisp. In the last two notes of the aria LP and FC are remarkably alike and indistinguishable from a sound quality perspective to the human ear. There is no question in my mind that FC's voice was not only big, but huge, and certainly bigger than LP's. You can verify that by the YouTube comparison on the net for yourself. LP most certainly was a great opera singer but in my mind Franco Correlli is the greatest opera tenor in recorded history. I did not know that until I recently made the comparisons for myself. To my surprise, I find that I am not alone in that view.

Join Crosscut now! Subscribe to Newsletter About Crosscut Advertise Web Feeds