Shouldn't we just pay college football players?
Seeing another Husky risk paralysis is a good time to remember that in big-time college sports, everyone gets money except those taking risks on the field.
When Oregon State defender Al Afalava "put a hit" Saturday night on Washington quarterback Jake Locker, it looked like an already-terrible Husky football season was about to end early.
As a Husky fan since the Junior Coffey era, I felt sorry for myself until I realized the kid on the field lying very, very still could be paralyzed for life.
Such is the consequence of the violence of football.
Locker was strapped to a gurney and taken away by ambulance, only to return to the sidelines, walking but wearing a brace on his neck. The injury was called a "stinger" and a trapezius muscle strain.
It all made me think of another Husky, Curtis Williams, who did not return after his own helmet-to-helmet injury during a 2000 game. He was paralyzed so completely he needed a ventilator and constant nursing care. He died two years later. (It was almost spooky that the player photographed consoling Locker, Corey Williams, had "C. Williams" on his jersey.)
Football provides athletes such as Locker and Williams scholarships to cover their schooling, helmets that provide some measure of safety, and rules that say intentional helmet-to-helmet hits are unsafe and should be avoided, except when they can't be avoided, when men of bulk, frenzy, and strength run at each other full bore.
If athletes do get injured, they receive help from the NCAA's catastrophic injury insurance, up to $20 million in lifetime benefits, according to an article in Columns magazine. For Williams, the benefits fell short of what he needed for home care, though the policy was later improved.
Athletes know the risks they take, of course. And for some fans, watching one player deck another is part of the fun. You can watch all the hits on SportsCenter.
But Locker's injury, however lasting, is a reminder of a truth about big time college sports. The players take those risks for fun and the slim hope of a pro contract, while the coaches, universities, and TV networks make the big money. Locker's coach, Ty Willingham, makes more than $1.5 million, twice what UW President Mark Emmert makes.
In Sunday's New York Times, Moneyball author Michael Lewis wrote that college football is a business that doesn't pay its employees. They got nothing from the $1.8 billion in revenue generated in 2005 by the 121 Division 1-A football teams.
"Everyone else associated with it is getting rich except the people whose labor creates the value," he wrote. Many of the employees are black and poor, performing for "the intense pleasure of millions of rabid college football fans, many of whom are rich and white."
Lewis says if the NCAA wanted to keep money out of college football, it should give away tickets, put games on public television, and set limits on what coaches get paid.
If not, pay the players. A star quarterback should be as much as 8 percent of a team's revenue. In 2005, for example, that would have paid Texas quarterback Vince Young roughly $5 million.
Lewis basically calls college football a sanctioned theft of athletes. Think of that next time we're all singing "Tequila."
Like what you just read? Support high quality local journalism. Become a member of Crosscut today!










Twitter
Facebook
RSS Feeds
Comments:
Posted Tue, Nov 13, 10:52 p.m. Inappropriate
linked text
Ah but I digress. The real point to my rant is that more of us are finally beginning to believe that another much larger shadow industry has always been behind the popularity of football in our country's colleges and football stadiums. Football stands as one of the largest concentrations for gambling funds in America. You pick up conversations at work, in phone conversations, at the bar about spreads and odds on games, players and outcomes. It's this sub-industry that actually drives the frenzy in the media; the countless pages in newspapers across the country devoted - no, dedicated - to every single bit of minutia related to every team and each player provides the fodder for bookies and gamblers alike, each vying for an edge against the other. I would venture to guess that this other industry is at least ten times larger than the football industry itself. How many of you can honestly say you don't know anyone who bets on a football game here and there, regardless of whether it's an office pool or more serious bucks with the local bookie? I wonder if anyone has even tried to estimate the size of this underground industry? Hmm - a final thought: What if you paid your team doctors well enough to send injured players back out to the field just because it'll cut the team's spread in the game? Nawww....
Posted Fri, Nov 16, 9:26 p.m. Inappropriate
"Since Williams' injury, the UW has raised approximately $400,000 to support his long-term care and assist with expenses over and above those covered by family, University and NCAA catastrophic insurance. Remaining funds will be used to establish the Curtis Williams Scholarship in his honor. Contributions may be sent to the Curtis Williams Fund, c/o University of Washington, 1200 Fifth Ave., Suite 500, Seattle, WA 98101."
So, although the athletes don't get paid, the UW and the NCAA do have insurance for athletes. In the case of a Jake Locker, however, there really ought to be insurance that covers the loss of likely future income in the NFL. I think families, if they can afford it, can go out and get this sort of insurance on their own. Where is the money supposed to come from? Not the UW's or the NCAA's problem.
Back to Curtis Williams, it's really outrageous and a miscarriage of justice that college football players risk their lives -- as Curtis's case proves -- yet cannot earn any money playing college football.
May Curtis Williams soul rest in peace.
Posted Sun, Nov 18, 11:35 a.m. Inappropriate
RE: Remember Curtis Williams?: So, who was this year's recipient of the Curtis Williams Scholarship ?
Login or register to add your voice to the conversation.