There's no waiting until 2009 for Mayor Greg Nickels
He's re-electing himself right now, without votes, by raising money to lock out any serious challenger. It's the sad state of the modern election cycle, and the only solution is for potential donors to just say no to candidates until late in a campaign.
Here we are two years away from the next Seattle city election, and already it appears that Mayor Greg Nickels is raising money and building up his inevitability. Neighbors for Nickels reports a relatively modest $72,493 in its account (as of a Nov. 17 filing with the city). The Mayor Greg Nickels Web site doesn't play coy, touting, "Re-elect Greg Nickels Seattle Mayor 2009."
An Oct. 25 event tapped some of the major leaders in local arts organizations, such as the Seattle Art Museum, Seattle Opera, Seattle Symphony, One Reel, and the Museum of History and Industry (MOHAI), raising $4,500. An upcoming Jan. 28 "community event and fundraiser to support Seattle Mayor Greg Nickels" has some strong environmental and political names on the hosting committee: Denis Hayes, the noted environmentalist who is key to Nickels' global climate change initiatives; Frank Greer, who ran Gov. Chris Gregoire's 2004 campaign; developer Gregory Smith; Jabe Blumenthal, a technology leader; sustainability guru K.C. Golden; green donor Maryanne Tagney-Jones; Kathy Fletcher of People for Puget Sound; Doug Walker of the Parks Foundation; and others.
The peculiar new timetable for American politics is that you start raising money for the next election just a few weeks after getting elected. The real campaign takes place right about now in a four year cycle – 18 to 24 months before the actual election. Raise enough money now and line up enough early big names, and by the time a serious opponent gets organized, it's too late.
It's not for sure that Nickels will seek re-election, since a new Democratic president might have a tempting job for the mayor, whose national profile is quite positive. But that's no reason not to start now to squeeze out any strong challengers, just in case. Nickels has honed his message for the coming years, citing three priorities of congestion, schools, and affordable housing. (He's done well only on schools, helping off-stage to engineer the vastly improved School Board.) His trusty fundraiser, Colby Underwood, is already helping raise money. One possible opponent, retiring City Council member Peter Steinbrueck, has only $16,253 in his Friends of Peter Steinbrueck account, by the way.
The most vivid illustration of this crush-'em-early approach is the King County Council, where Nickels once served. The early war chest is so common that now virtually every council member runs unopposed. On the City Council in the past year, only Tom Rasmussen was able to score the complete victory of no opponent at all.
It's bad news for competitive elections, of course. It takes a long time for a serious opponent to a powerful incumbent to screw up the courage and find the media attention to mount a serious challenge. Most will be reluctant and procrastinate, forcing supporters to lay the groundwork. That timing is fatal if the incumbent has already mobilized a juggernaut (denying that he or she has decided on running yet). Meanwhile, people who contribute early are caught in a bind when a more attractive candidate appears later in the rigged game.
As a journalist, I don't contribute to races anymore. But as a citizen, I'd deploy the following rule, when the phone starts ringing: Don't take this personally, but on principle I never contribute to incumbents' campaigns until the last (six, nine, 12) months. Happy to talk then. Bye!
Like what you just read? Support high quality local journalism. Become a member of Crosscut today!











Twitter
Facebook
RSS Feeds
Comments:
Posted Fri, Dec 7, 10:05 a.m. Inappropriate
Why contribute at all?: It seems like contributing money to a political candidate is enabling that candidate to pay for junk mail, robot phone calls and radio/tv commercials. Not contributing could be the best way to reduce or eliminate these irritations.
Posted Fri, Dec 7, 10:22 a.m. Inappropriate
This is news to me - but we were all kind of suspicious about the injection of money into the winning school board campaigns. What exactly did Nickels do "offstage" that you liked so much? And wouldn't this be the exact kind of harmful political manipulating that you are criticizing him for in this article?
And while we are on the subject of public schools, tell us what is so improved about this school board? What makes you an expert on Seattle Public Schools? Details please (especially on the WASL and the new math program that‘s being forced down our kids throats and that is damaging their ability to think and reason).
A little less arrogant hypocrisy in your writing would make your words more believable.
Posted Fri, Dec 7, 12:44 p.m. Inappropriate
Not worth a nickel: Anyone who gives $$$$ to Greg Nickels suffers from severe "DDDD", that being Deficient Demented Donor Disorder. From extremely poor fiscal oversight while on the Sound Transit Board to faux issues such as global warming while all the usual urban issues go unaddressed and unsolved, the Nickel man is one of the worst elected locals in decades. Rumors of a collection of Heavey Chong Schell Sidran and Runte political signs in storage have not yet been confirmed.
Posted Fri, Dec 7, 1:18 p.m. Inappropriate
True this has always been a reality in politics but it has reached proportions that are truly astounding if not totally cynical. I am surprised that the author of this piece was not outraged! Instead he just offered up the advice to 'just say No' to early solicitation of funds.
Posted Fri, Dec 7, 3:10 p.m. Inappropriate
mayor for the rich and influential: Indeed, a sad commentary on our political situation. Money talks and the mayor listens. Sadly, if you call a city department, you also have to listen to the mayor every 30 seconds when on hold (as you are sure to be when calling a city office.) Record flooding in Seattle and the mayor and every spokesperson (including councilmembers) would have us believe the city bears no responsibility nor liability: if only we would clean those storm drains and call them when we see a problem. Ever see a street sweeper in a residential neighborhood in Seattle? I have called for three years running about a defective storm drain on my street and did so again this week as I watched the hole next to a culvert expand by 4-times in area. When the street collapses and the sewer, electrical, and water mains go with it, guess it will be my fault for not shoveling gravel into the hole. What, you don't also consider the Allen-town trolley a triumph for the mayor? As for the so-called enviros supporting the mayor, guess they don't care about his proposal to give away a large chunk of Magnuson Park to commercial development - and waterfront property at that. The mayor has fed at the public trough long enough (and maybe at the dinner table, too.) The mayor needs an honest job for a change. Let's see that he has to look for one.
Posted Fri, Dec 7, 9:30 p.m. Inappropriate
Steinbrueck?: Any of you Crosscutters have inside info on whether Peter is going to run for mayor? Perhaps one of you could write an article making the case to him why he should run. I think he'd beat Nickels, even if he was outspent in the process.
Posted Tue, Jan 8, 6:43 a.m. Inappropriate
The rule is that big money wins, but a strong populist can be an exception to the rule. I see Nickels as easily beatable.
On principle, I may decide to not accept any donations to my campaign. I still may accept contributions, but I'm heavily leaning against it at this time.
It will be about a year and two months from now when I start "actively campaigning".
I have a strong voice and a strong message. I will play well in the media.
David Wolbeck
4706 South Orcas Street
Seattle, WA 98118
206-721-5023
protestmaverick@comcast.net
Posted Fri, Sep 26, 7:48 a.m. Inappropriate
I am running for mayor to fill the void of compassion in politics.
End Homelessness
End Hunger
Community Bikes
Ban Slave-Made Products
War-Free Zone
Rubber Sidewalks
Gay Marriage
Remove the Alaskan Viaduct
De-Prioritize Marijuana Law Enforcement
Rhonda Goebel
9543 Greenwood Ave North
Seattle, WA 98103
206/706-1297
Waterfront Parks
Login or register to add your voice to the conversation.