The rock star of hope

What's amazing about Barack Obama's message is that he can make something so wholesome seem so sexy.

Barack Obama announcing his candidacy in Springfield, Ill., with the historic state house as backdrop.

Barack Obama announcing his candidacy in Springfield, Ill., with the historic state house as backdrop.



A testament to just how good Barack Obama is is how good he makes the other politicians on stage with him look. It's like he casts a glow that turns a conventional political tableaux – some stuffy old pols in folding chairs – into a scene washed in the light of a Caravaggio.

I just got back from hearing Obama speak at Seattle's KeyArena. He was joined on stage by three local politicians who are not exactly paragons of charisma: U.S. Rep. Adam Smith, D-Tacoma, Seattle Mayor Greg Nickels, and Gov. Chris Gregoire. Yet such was the atmosphere created by Obama's fans, and such was Obama's rhetoric, that he made all three seems like the best-lit back-up band a guy ever had. Obama, of course, was the real rock star.

But the pragmatic Smith seemed statesman-like when he made his introductory remarks. Nickels jazzed the crowd with his talk about global warming, and Gregoire brought down the house with her endorsement of the junior senator from Illinois. I can't imagine any of them have faced a more enthusiastic crowd, or ever looked better. Gregoire's cheeks glowed, and she exuded a joy that is often missing when she turns stern and delivers a lawyerly lecture. She even looked happy to be sharing the stage with Nickels, with whom she's battled. Obama took politicians who can make us cynical and burnished them bright before our very eyes.

The crowd was, in Obamaese, "fired up and ready to go." The arena on Friday, Feb. 8, was packed to the rafters with at least 18,000 (according to Nickels, who said he hoped the fire marshal wasn't around). Another 3,000, he said, were turned away – too bad since the luxury suites looked mostly empty. Long lines, far worse than anything you've experienced at Bumbershoot, snaked outside, the rope lines packed with Obamaphiles, mostly young people filled with a kind of pre-concert excitement.

When Obama entered, it was electric and loud. But he delivers such an unlikely mixture of messages. He plays to his Lincolnian roots – a tall, gangly man from Springfield, Ill., who has embarked on an unlikely mission. He delivers a high-minded sermon about hope and responsibility and public service, but it goes down so smooth you don't gag on stuffy communitarianism. And since when did the message of bipartisanship become so sexy?

Obama is at his least interesting when he's talking about what he'll do – affordable health care, ending the war in Iraq by the end of 2009 – and at his most compelling when he's weaving the context for his candidacy. He calls himself a "hopemonger" and stands against the cynicism of the politics of old. He says that we are at "a defining moment in our history" and uses that to create a sense of urgency not just for changing the world but for changing ourselves.

It's more subtle than Oprah, Martin Luther King, even John F. Kennedy. Certainly more subtle than the "I-feel-your-pain" Bill Clinton of 1992. It's a carefully crafted generational appeal that seeks both to imbue the young with a sense not simply that things are broken in America and need fixing but that they can't be unless we fix ourselves. Part of that fix is a renewed sense of the possible, a revitalized sense of shared responsibility. We must "challenge ourselves to be better," he says. It's not the soggy, self help of personal confession but the setting of a higher bar for all of us.

That has to be about the most wholesome, straightlaced message in politics in a generation or more. What amazes is how much power it seems to have. Obama promises to dissipate the "fog of fear" that has gripped this country and to lead differently. He criticizes Sen. Hillary Clinton of New York for accusing him of "peddling false hopes" and needing a "reality check." His reality is a bigger reality, not one of petty policy differences, partisanship, and cynical incrementalism.

The audience stays with him because it wants to be free, too, to see the spell of George W. Bush broken: the fog lifted, the constitution respected and obeyed, the Gitmos and gulags closed forever. Obama promises the end of the era of "Scooter Libby justice, Brownie incompetence, and Karl Rove politics." The kids roar with delight.

He's also building a new base for belief in government. The last transformational pol, Ronald Reagan, convinced everyone to accept that government was the problem, not the solution. Bill Clinton declared that the era of big government was over. Obama is sewing seeds with youth. Government is us, and it's a place to do good for each other. He touts a $4,000-per-year college tuition credit for students that has a string attached: You get the credit if you pay it back through public service. "We'll invest in you and you will invest in America." Government is no longer your savior or your enemy. It's what you make of it.

Excuse the baby-boomer reference, but Ward Cleaver couldn't have put it better. But unlike Obama, Ward's scoldings didn't make us stand up and cheer.

One question I've had about Obama: Is he the Seattle Monorail Project of presidential politics, the sexy idea that gets young people pumped up only to fall apart when the grown-ups find out how impractical it all really is? Many political observers are cynical, too, about Obama's strengths. Already, some liberal commentators have criticized his oratorical powers, saying he's too emotional, "fascistic" in the words of one commentator. Others have the Hillary worry – that he's a Pied Piper promising a transformation he cannot deliver.

Critics like these, Obama suggests, are people who would like to "boil the hope out of him," but he refuses to give up hope. He wouldn't be where he is if he had. He doesn't promise transformation so much as spell out what has to happen for it to occur. He offers the promise of himself in the effort and asks that everyone else do the same. It's a pretty practical plan, really, sold eloquently – hardly messianic.

In the momentary magic of a political rally, one can actually see the gleam of hope in the eyes of even the more worldly politicians of an older generation. One thinks: If Obama can light up these guys, we're half way home.

When you see hope do that, it's hard not to want all the cynics to step aside and let it run like hell. If the youth want to rebuild America on Obama's terms, why not let them try? Why not help? It's not like the old way of doing things has been working.


About the Author

Knute Berger is Mossback, Crosscut's chief Northwest native. He also writes the monthly Grey Matters column for Seattle magazine and is a weekly Friday guest on Weekday on KUOW-FM (94.9). His newest book is Pugetopolis: A Mossback Takes On Growth Addicts, Weather Wimps, and the Myth of Seattle Nice, published by Sasquatch Books. In 2011, he was named Writer-in-Residence at the Space Needle and is author of Space Needle, The Spirit of Seattle (2012), the official 50th anniversary history of the tower. You can e-mail him at mossback@crosscut.com.

Like what you just read? Support high quality local journalism. Become a member of Crosscut today!

Comments:

Posted Sat, Feb 9, 9:43 a.m. Inappropriate

fascistic?: Who, pray tell, was the "commentator" who said that Obama was "fascistic"? It seems a little sloppy -- even unseemly -- to toss out an accusation/comment of that sort without even a hint of a reference or citation. So who's the commentator? Are you quoting yourself? A dinner-table comment rather than one for the public record? What?

Posted Sat, Feb 9, 10:30 a.m. Inappropriate

RE: fascistic?: David Plotz of Slate in a podcast. According to an account at RawStory.com, he was chided for that characterization, but defended it thusly: "My brother who is an academic wrote this wonderful book about crowds, and crowd theory. And one of the sort of lessons that he's always imparted to me is just that crowds are terrifying. Crowds are horrifying for the most part because they have a will of their own, and they act independently of rationality. And I think that Obama relies hugely on that. That's not to say, I don't, I still support him, but I don't like that fascistic, I like him not for the fascistic elements of his candidacy, which I think are profound." According to RawStory, Plotz admitted that he had not actually been to an Obama rally.

Posted Sat, Feb 9, 10:45 a.m. Inappropriate

RE: fascistic?: It was David Plotz, deputy editor at Slate, in a podcast. Here's an article about it.

Posted Sat, Feb 9, 11:32 a.m. Inappropriate

Wholesale Politics: Crowds - and speaking to crowds - is part of the political process.

I am a former local elected official. I've run for office. Sure, you meet and talk with individuals. You have conversations. But in a race for Governor - or President - you have to get focused on volume. There isn't time to meet and shake hands with every voter in a big city, a state, or the USA.

Christine Gregoire probably spoke to the biggest crowd of her life yesterday. She also gave the best speech she has ever given.

Obama knows how to work a room. He is very serious. Hardly smiles. He leaves the burden of action on the listener. His style, energy and momentum remind me of Bobby Kennedy during the spring of 1968.

The jerk at Slate needs to get real. Ross
Ross

Posted Sat, Feb 9, 4:19 p.m. Inappropriate

just come from the caucus: and Obama can light up a room even when he's not in it! Our precinct was packed, standing room only, and Obama supporters outnumbered Hillarians two to one.

Posted Sun, Feb 10, 1:15 a.m. Inappropriate

fascist Bush: People have labeled Bush as a 'fascist' for the last 8 yrs w/ no supporting evidence, so it's a little late in the game to complain about the inappropriate use of 'fascism.' I think that only a tiny percentage of people who use that term could provide a working definition thereof.

The Monorail comparison is marvelous. Remember that local power brokers were cool to the SMP because they saw it as a threat to the tried & true tax$$$ rathole, namely Sound Transit. However people like Mayor Nickels did eventually yield to popular feelings & jumped on the SMP bandwagon before having to jump back off.

Obama =Monorail, Hillary= Sound Transit.
rasul

Posted Sun, Feb 10, 10:42 a.m. Inappropriate

Knute you exceed yourself: I have never read a better account of a political rally or a vision of leader. Knute you have outdone yourself. I especially liked the following "It's a carefully crafted generational appeal that seeks both to imbue the young with a sense not simply that things are broken in America and need fixing but that they can't be unless we fix ourselves. Part of that fix is a renewed sense of the possible, a revitalized sense of shared responsibility. We must "challenge ourselves to be better," he says. It's not the soggy, self help of personal confession but the setting of a higher bar for all of us. Thanks Knute.

KK

Posted Sun, Feb 10, 2:40 p.m. Inappropriate

..AND THE BEEF IS?: I can't watch politicians talk, even ones I like, so consider me ignorant and agnostic.

I am curious. What is he going to do? raise taxes? lower taxes? abandon Iraq? continue the Iraq occupation? is he going to open our borders more completely to casual immigration? tighten up the border? pass federally funded healthcare (I probably know the answer to that one but humor me)? fight global warming? relax and enjoy global warming?

Hilary with a better delivery? appeals to Republicans and conservatives?

A man that persuasive must have his name on a lot of legislation, right?
kieth

Posted Sun, Feb 10, 2:55 p.m. Inappropriate

RE: Knute you exceed yourself: This might be the best article I've read about the election yet. Truly inspired stuff, Knute.

Sean

Posted Sun, Feb 10, 7:48 p.m. Inappropriate

Exert yourself and do a little research.: Kieth wonders about the beef, then strings together a bunch of questions. Then Crosscut editors give him a little "editors' pick" symbol. Hmmm ... what was Kieth's significant contribution?

Answers to most of the questions he poses can be found by checking on the candidates' websites, googling for media stories about speeches they've given, reading analysis and op-eds that compare records, positions.

THAT is where the beef is (ungrammatic, but whatever).

The quere about sponsored legislation is a little too cute; that's only one of many criteria that we might use to pick a candidate. I'm looking for JUDGMENT, the ability to size up a situation and express a position or plan that illustrates the values and intelligence of the speaker. While both Democratic candidates show judgment superior to any of the Republican candidates IMHO, Obama speaks to a critical need to re-make American politics, a message that hits a visceral note with many, many people ... a large number of whom had not previously been actively involved in politics.

He is fired up; we are fired up. That is remarkable!

Good work, Knute. Lots of us wish we could have been there.
debo

Posted Sun, Feb 10, 9:53 p.m. Inappropriate

RE: ..AND THE BEEF IS?: The premise behind your post - that there is a single right or wrong answer for most of these questions - is flawed.

Take your question about raising or lowering taxes. Are you really looking for a president who promotes lowering taxes no matter what? That's kind of like a stock broker who always thinks MSFT is a buy, regardless of its price or the company's performance. The same applies to Iraq - the next president should make the decision about when to leave based on conditions at that time, not how it was a year ago in February 2008.

Personally, I'm looking for a president who can take in new facts and use them to make sound, intelligent decisions. The last thing we need is another fool suffering from the delusion that the answers are in his gut.

You're mistaking BS for beef.
Sean

Posted Sun, Feb 10, 11:19 p.m. Inappropriate

when reality settles in: I'm with the skeptics. It's not that I doubt Obama's sincerity or ability. It's the fact that the challenges faced by the next president are enormous: ending an occupation without making things worse, reinvigorating a national economy in an era when transnational corporations are more powerful than governments, creating immigration policy that satisfies national security fanatics without depleting the low-cost labor pool for business.

I can't help but think that the platforms and promises of both candidates will lead to disappointment. It's not going to be pretty for those who had such high hopes for the first black or woman president...
Jeff Chiu

Posted Mon, Feb 11, 9:37 a.m. Inappropriate

hope is a lot of hooey, its just another mindless drug: i recall that in 2004 the brilliant mr. berger was taken in by the castrato john kerry.

obama's slogan "hope" is vacuous. moreover, hope is just another drug. obama's foreign policy adviser is ziggy Brzezinski of afghan destabilization fame; and some may recall how that dastardly act and the creation of stinger equipped mullahs, then left to their own devices [sic!] came to roost. ziggi more of a hawk than dear old hennery of Wurstburg on the Hudson ever was.

as to iraq. georgie porgie really did it. he got stuck and you can't get out only further in. face it guys but you won't. if you had really wanted to you would have impeached and tried bush and cheney and rumsfeld for war crimes. that makes you as complicit as the german people were with hitler.

so obama wants to reduce the presence to 50 k troops.. in the 10 thousand person embassy and the various permanent bases. the American people will go along with any criminal foreign policy adventure as long as not too many of their own kids are killed. then they start getting upset. otherwise they don't' really give a damn . but when they start feeling not so good about themselves they long for another feel good reagan type. you can't get out, you're stuck. face it. obviously as to domestic policy either obama or clinton would try to scale back the horrors perpetrated by the current clown.
mccain would of course also go into Waziristan in these Indian wars, my guess is that he will win and die of apoplexy the first year in office and we'll have a president chucklehead.
mikerol

Posted Mon, Feb 11, 6:54 p.m. Inappropriate

RE: hope is a lot of hooey, its just another mindless drug: Mike, McCain's VP choice will be huge due to his age, rumors that he is committed to one term only, and his need to mollify the R conservative base. Add to that the likelihood of a close race and the need to pay attention to the normal demographic balancing considerations.

There was a saying popular several years back (I think maybe even a book titled) "Hope is not a strategy."
rasul

Posted Sun, Feb 17, 3:32 p.m. Inappropriate

new folks at the table: one of the folks at my caucus said "how do we know thay Obama will bring change? the young NA woman at my side said, 'I'm here, I've never voted,
I'm the change that he promisses" lots of agreement followed - sometimes
we can't see what is right in front of us.
Jeanp246

Login or register to add your voice to the conversation.

Join Crosscut now!
Subscribe to our Newsletter

Follow Us »