The wall-to-wall coverage of the Dalai Lama's visit to Seattle is unprecedented. The Seattle Times has covered and blogged his every move and utterance around town, even to the point of highlighting stories on the Web in colors – gold and red – that pick up the hues of his familiar monk's robe.
It wasn't so during his visit in 1993, even though his message was pretty much the same. Under the headline "Dalai Lama arrives here calling for compassion," a short piece on his arrival in town described his welcome:
The Dalai Lama flew into Boeing Field last night to a modest, low-key welcome befitting a simple Buddhist monk, as Tibet's spiritual leader likes to call himself.
His visit then received modest notice. This time the simple Buddhist monk has had motorcades and security, a talk at Qwest Field, a rock concert, an honorary degree, hugs from the governor ...
Part of it is timing: Tibet's protests, China's crackdown, and the coming Olympics have all raised the profile of the visit. But it is interesting that here in secular Seattle, a religious figure like the Dalai Lama has been getting so much ink, attention, and good press.
Seattle is capital of the "None Zone," the area of the country that hosts the largest percentage of Americans who list "none of the above" when asked their religious preference. That doesn't mean we aren't spiritual folk: We've got lots of believers in God who don't belong to a church, many pagans and nature worshipers, and secular humanists who don't hold to any particular faith but are moved by ideas and a desire to live more morally in the world.
That, I think, is one reason the Dalai Lama is making such a splash this time around: We're a country that's been embroiled in global conflicts from which there seems no extraction, we've set the planet's climate controls on self-destruct, and more generally, I think, many liberals, conservatives, and people in between agree that we live in a bankrupt (literally and morally) commercial culture that seems to be eating our young. We're being American Idolized.
Perhaps people are hungry for someone to restore faith in compassion, which has been so ill-used by politicians like George W. Bush, who once promised a brand of "compassionate conservatism" that turned out in our Darwinian society to be a contradiction in terms.
The Dalai Lama, too, is fair game for criticism as a both a political figure and spiritual leader of a culture where there is no separation of church and state. Yet at the same time, he has parlayed his exile status into a platform – call it a bully pulpit, even – to speak on matters beyond politics, to religions and peoples other than his own. This refugee knows pain and loss, and that gives him credibility when he speaks about seeking to embrace one's enemies and to recognize our role in the dynamics of conflict.
The local coverage of the Dalai Lama's visit also reminds me of reading newspapers in India, where amongst the reports of two-faced babies and cricket scores you are likely to find spiritual commentary unlike anything in American papers. Not just "prayer of the day" filler, but longer essays and meditations, often trying to bridge the spiritual interests of a county with large, varied religious populations, including Buddhists, Hindus, Muslims, and others. I came across a commentary in a Mumbai paper, called "Path to Samsara and Nirvana", that is typical of the genre:
Look about and contemplate life! Everything is transient and nothing endures. There is birth and death, growth and decay; there is combination and separation. The glory of the world is like a flower: it stands in full bloom in the morning and fades in the heat of the day. Wherever you look, there is a rushing and struggling, and an eager pursuit of pleasure.
It's hard to imagine that lead paragraph surviving any editor's pen at any mainstream paper here, on or off the editorial page.
Like what you just read? Support high quality local journalism. Become a member of Crosscut today!