The ghost of Mike Lowry
At Seattle's 7th District caucus, the elder statesmen of the Democratic Party seemed oddly out of place. The youthful grassroots have displaced the bosses of old, and white guys in ties smell like yesterday's news.
One impression of the recent U.S. 7th District Democratic caucus in Seattle lingers: youth supplanting age. Part of that may be the change-driven politics of Sen. Barrack Obama's campaign — and Obama supporters dominated the caucus. But it is due in to the fact the Democratic party has morphed into a more grassroots operation than in the old days. The people who looked most out of place at the caucus were some of the few, gray, eminence politicians who attended: Seattle Mayor Greg Nickels, U.S. Rep. Jim McDermott of Seattle, and former Gov. Mike Lowry, who also once held McDermott's seat in Congress. The delegates were generally young and highly diverse, racially and ethnically. The warhorses were older, white males who smelled like yesterday's news.
It was a huge contrast to my last foray this deep into Democratic politics. In 1972, I was an 18-year-old delegate elected at my precinct caucus. Everyone looked older back then — almost everyone was older — but the meetings, conventions, and caucuses I attended were dominated by old white guys in ties. And there was definitely a machine: smoke-filled rooms were operating, delegates were handed pre-picked slates and platform positions to support. You had the feeling all the real business was being done out of sight, and you were merely a foot soldier, there to take orders.
Not this time. Most of the delegates at the caucus on May 17 were young, the process was far more open and chaotic, older white guys were few and far between, there were almost no neckties, and smoking was prohibited. At times there seemed to be little adult supervision — the caucus organizers, however, were good cat-herders. More than 200 of the some 300 delegates were running to be one of nine to go on from the 7th to the Democratic National Convention in Denver.
Conservative commentator William F. Buckley once said he'd rather be governed by the first 2,000 names in the Boston phone directory than the 2,000 members of the Harvard faculty. This caucus had the feel of a direct democracy in which the Seattle phone book's listees were all candidates. Nearly everyone was in campaign mode. If nothing else, it added fizz to the proceedings.
Plus, there was still a slim chance for the Obama and Sen. Hillary Clinton supporters to convert other delegates to their candidate. Clinton boosters were a smaller contingent, of about 70, but loud and well organized (and older). The men's room door was plastered with Hillary signs. Inside one of the bathroom stalls, at eye level on the inside door, was a disconcerting sign that said, "Vote Chelsea," visible to all male throne-sitters. It turned out this wasn't the Clintons' thinking ahead but rather a delegate candidate with that name.
Would-be delegates made placards, stamped out buttons, gave away chotchkes (door stops, bottled water, home-made Obama fans). It was as if everyone in school was running for prom king or queen and had been up all night with the craft paper and felt pens. Some had been sending e-mails, postcards, and letters to their fellow delegates for weeks.
The setting contributed to the back-to-school feel. Hand-drawn banners and posters festooned the North Seattle Community College gym where the caucus was held. Some delegates had sign-waving posses in matching t-shirts, others touted endorsements from party big-wigs. Everyone was given 30 seconds to make a direct pitch for election. So make that a prom royalty election crossed with American Idol.
Nickels and McDermott made brief appearances before the delegate voting began. Nickels reminded people that turnout in November was key and said that in 2004, Sen. John Kerry only failed to carry one Seattle precinct, the gated community of Broadmoor. (Warning to Broadmoor: Expect to be boarded by doorbellers!)
McDermott told the audience that he has never been more excited to go back to Congress, because he might actually be able to get something done, especially with the prospect of a Democratic president and an expanded Democratic majority in the House. For me, this emphasized the rap against McDermott as a guy who hasn't delivered much, but his symbolic importance as an enemy of the far right still appeals to his Seattle base.
When Nickels was introduced, there were a few boos (not so for Sunny Jim), and Nickels and McDermott seemed to pass each other with nary a nod. But mostly they stood out because they didn't reflect the demographics of the room.
Then there was the wraith-like presence of Mike Lowry, who looked older, slimmer, and unusually sartorially splendid in a nice gray suit. He was there to support one of the candidates for delegate, environmental activist Janet Wainwright, who mounted an impressive effort with major endorsements, mailers, and a phone-call campaign to drum up support.
Lowry sat in the hot gym all day to make a less-than-30-second pitch for Wainwright. While he waited, he sat off to the side against a wall. The sight of a former governor and member of Congress spending so much time on so small an errand seemed almost poignant. The fact that Wainwright lost in the first round of voting made it even more so. In the old Democratic party, such a thing would have been unthinkable. An elder statesman like Lowry would have used his influence and won. And if he was not assured of victory, he would not have used his political capital at all.
Like what you just read? Support high quality local journalism by becoming a member of Crosscut.com today!









Comments:
Posted Wed, May 28, 3:02 a.m. inappropriate
ol white guys--cain't trust em: you can't trust them ol white guys. They're violent, and they're super sexed-up. I'd like to see every one of 'em locked up.
Posted Wed, May 28, 8:12 a.m. inappropriate
Lowry who?: It's funny -- I saw the headline of the Crosscut email about the "ghost of Mike Lowry" and thought, oh, yeah, I remember him. He was a US Representative. How did I forget that he was governor?!?
I now remember hearing him talk in early 1992 at Kane Hall regarding a push for universal health care and he introduced himself as "someone looking for a job" or something like that.
OK, after a check of Wikipedia, I guess I don't remember him as governor because his period of guvnor-ship was during a spell when I didn't live in Seattle (read, Washington State) -- after high school and college, but before returning in '99.
Still, what has he been up to, and how is it that some ex-guvnors are very visible (Gardner, for instance) while others disappear?
Posted Wed, May 28, 8:45 a.m. inappropriate
This is reporting? This is commentary?: Yeah, times change. Wow, that's profound. In other news, rain is wet.
I was at the 7th CD caucus from beginning to end, and this pathetic article clearly is not describing what I saw and experienced.
I worked the floor ceaselessly for our two 18-year-old candidates for national delegate -- Nick Bordner and Laura Hicks -- and we got Nick elected. But I also worked the floor for Janet Wainwright -- and all the other 34th District delegates -- and it was my great pleasure to hang with Mike Lowry for about half an hour.
Poignant? My eye. Mike is very much involved. He wants to know every detail of everything that is going on, names, places, and faces. Your apparent premise that time has passed Mike by is just bogus. It might have some semblance of truth if Mike was still trying to inject himself into the process and influence it. But he isn't. He did his part for Janet and was content with that.
As we sat on the sidelines, dozens of people came over to speak to Mike, not all of them older. Mike knew plenty of people there and he had a comment on just about everything that was happening.
Mike is very much in the present. Sure, he tells stories about the past. Hell, my 16-year-old daughter, who was part of Nick and Laura's "posse," does that. Mike talked about the upcoming session of the Legislature, compared Gregoire with himself, Locke, and Booth Gardner, and showed an intense interest in many other subjects.
Did *you* talk to him?
Mike's not out of date, but your "perceptions" sure are. This is not what I call reporting. This is pure, off-the-top-of-the-head crapola. The readers don't need yet another brain dump. We can read Van Dyk or Erica C. Barnett for that.
Posted Wed, May 28, 9:38 a.m. inappropriate
RE: This is reporting? This is commentary?: Ivan, Don't get your shorts in a knot. This piece wasn't a news article but an interesting set of observations from another delegate. Lighten up....
Posted Wed, May 28, 10:36 a.m. inappropriate
Politics aside, your writing sings: What a great read. I sent a link to my writing students as an example of how a nonfiction piece, whatever its topic, can be a compelling read. It reminded me why I, a liberal, enjoy reading George Will.
Posted Wed, May 28, 8:56 p.m. inappropriate
More info: HistoryLink recently added a new bio of Mike Lowry
Posted Wed, May 28, 10:17 p.m. inappropriate
I also love the reflective writing in this piece: While I am not a fan of Mossback's point of view, his writing is lyrical. This piece had me wistful for some of the old white guys -- many whom I worked for or with. Some readers, like Ivan, take any mention of one of the Party elders as a reason to jump down the gullets of the author in order to defend the politician. Frankly, I'm surprised that Ivan didn't jump to the defense of Congressman McDoNothing. In any case, Knute let Baghdad Jim off the hook too easily.
My biggest hope this year is that, sometime in the next few weeks before filing closes, one of these magical and inspired Obamatrons -- or a pissed-off and motivated Hillarista -- files against our worthless 7th District Congressman and takes him out.
Put some of your magical words to that idea, Knute. Thousands of us can not only salivate over your poetic prose, but about the need for change at the local level.
Posted Fri, May 30, 7:10 a.m. inappropriate
RE: ol white guys--cain't trust em: That's what Gates and co. are teaching at the UW these days, isn't it?
Funny how those criticisms never seem to apply to them, just everyone else!?