Wanna rent a ranger station?
America's national forests are in the middle of a "heritage" crisis as historic structures fall victim to budget cuts, vandalism, and neglect. Northwest forests are not immune, but citizens can help. How about vacationing in a fire lookout this summer?
As I've written previously, despite major national, state, and local government programs to promote historic preservation and protection of landmarks, public agencies often come up short when it comes to their own stewardship of such resources. Further evidence of that is in a recent Washington Post story that painted a grim picture of what's happening in our National Forests. Citing a new study by the National Trust for Historic Preservation, the Post reported that "millions of historic sites, crumbling and collapsing in national forests around the country, are in danger of being lost forever." And the Pacific Northwest's forests are not immune to the trend.
The short version is that budget and personnel cuts and shifts have caused the National Forest Service to fall behind in taking care of heritage sites in its trust, ranging from Civil War battlefields to old lodges and fire lookouts, from Native American archaeological sites to cabins built by the Civilian Conservation Corps (CCC). According to the Post, the Trust reports that "only a small slice of about 2 million 'cultural resources' that sit on 193 million acres managed by the U.S. Forest Service have been properly preserved."
Their deterioration, says the Post, "has been accelerated by vandalism, theft, fire, damage from off-road vehicles and other recreation, as well as oil and gas extraction, mining, timber harvesting and grazing. ..." As funds have been shifted to other activities, like firefighting, heritage preservation has slipped down the priority list. Reports the Post: "In the current fiscal year, $14 million of the Forest Service's $4.4 billion budget — 0.3 percent — is devoted to heritage programs."
In trying to get a picture of the challenges in this part of the country, I talked with Rick McClure, archaeologist and heritage program manager for Gifford Pinchot National Forest in Washington and Mount Hood National Forest in Oregon.
He agrees there are major problems. One reason is that many of the Forest Service's own facilities have become historically significant. Indeed, a number of Washington's national forests celebrate their centennials this year, including Columbia (now Gifford Pinchot), Chelan, Snoqualmie, Wenatchee, and Okanogan, which were created by executive orders in 1908. They are full of forest service infrastructure — from ranger stations to guest lodges — that not only serve forest service employees but people who use the forests for recreation and retreat. An inventory of historic Forest Service buildings in Washington and Oregon listed over 1,500 of them. Some were built by famous architects, some are important by virtue of age, others represent design styles that are considered significant, not the least of which are CCC buildings of the 1930 and '40s.
McClure told me that in his personal opinion, "the biggest impact to our historic buildings has been agency downsizing. We have vacant administrative complexes across the region that include National Register-listed and eligible buildings. It's a struggle to keep these buildings occupied and maintained."
Vacancy is the enemy of preservation because mothballed buildings can quickly deteriorate and are subject to vandalism and theft. McClure points to the Oak Grove Ranger Station complex in Oregon, which features 10 '1930s-era CCC buildings. The complex was trashed by vandals who stole copper wiring and plumbing and even ripped off (as in both literally removed by force and stole) the metal roof of a barn presumably to sell for scrap. There is no money for repair.
And the Forest Service has made occupancy of some buildings problematic. They used to rent national forest residences to employees at a discount, but a recent edict put an end to that practice. Employees now must pay market rates, making it more expensive for many employees to live on site, says McClure. His rent in Trout Lake went up $200 per month because the new rate was set by the rental market in tourist mecca Hood River. That's a big hit to an employee's pocketbook and has the added effect of forcing forest service employees to commute longer distances, which hardly helps the carbon footprint.
One partial solution has been to keep some of the Forest Service's wonderful structures in use by renting them out to the public. A Web site details the charming and sometimes remote Northwest national forest facilities you can rent, ranging from cozy log cabins to lookouts perched on mountaintops. The fees are cheap, sometimes as little as $25 for a group. The program helps pay for upkeep, but not all worthy and historic structures are rentable. McClure joked that the title of this story should be: "Wanna Buy a Ranger Station?"
Another option is public/private partnerships in which the Forest Service finds long-term tenants who fund restoration and maintenance of facilities. An example is the mountain search and rescue group Crag Rats, who lease the historic 1889 Cloud Mountain Inn on Mount Hood for their headquarters.







Comments:
Posted Wed, Jun 4, 3:30 p.m. inappropriate
A Shift in Culture?: Knute's piece on the lack of maintenance and preservation in our national forests and parks unwittingly points to what may be part of the reason the work isn't being done to maintain the system. The people he interviewed were all, it seems, well educated folks none of whom fix things.
Part of the problem is that both the Forest Service and the National Parks have become top down managed agencies that employ educated professionals. It's wonderful in many ways, but not as good in others. Parks and the Forest Service employ historians, archilogists, entimologists, biologists, zologists, economists, architects, geologists, cartographers, accout managers, forest managers, statisticians, in short, nearly every skilled profession you can imagine. But, as the service hires more well educated trained professionals salaries increase and cut into the budget of those they hire to fix things. The result is a major change the culture of these agencies. Lots of planning and analysis and too little work maintaining.
Forest service employees of an earlier generation had fewer college degrees. Folks who loved the woods hired on and drove around in the familiar green pick up truck with tools in the back. When they found a problem they just fixed it. Todays forest service workers must note the problem, fill out three pages of an incident report and file it with the next in command where an MBA in management decides whether an outhouse needs a new toilet seat and puts it in queue for the next available toilet seat fixer. The problem is, we have too many expensive college educated managers doing toilet seat studies comparing plastic vs. wood and no money left in the budget to hire the people who replace the broken ones. Many of the professionals in todays forest service may well be good folks who might have studied forest management in a university, but the ratio of professionals to people willing to get their hands dirty along with the freedom and independence to get the job done, is a change the forest service might choose to consider.
It's not that the workers in the past were perfect. There is science in forestry that some of the old timers weren't aware of, but many in the old school loved their "woods" and tendered it's care with love and dedication that didn't have business hours or reports in triplicate. The pendulum needs to swing back a little into a time when, as the tv cable guy comedian chortles, "Get ur done!"
Posted Tue, Aug 5, 9:33 a.m. inappropriate
Get Ur Done: Get Ur Done is right.
FWIW, Forest Service employment is a desirable endeavor. Requiring college degrees in a relevant subject is not unwise - making those folks actually work, seasonally, is perhaps a better idea.
Unless of course that would violate the code of the liberal arts institutions from whence these people sprang???
-Douglas Tooley
My Blog