Nick Licata reprises his role as City Council menace
Being council president cramped his activist style. Now he's relishing a return to "Licata non grata." He's energized enough to be thinking about running again, maybe for mayor.
Nick Licata is back!
Since his two-year term as Seattle City Council president ended in January, Licata has become, once again, an activist and odd man out. To heck with consensus-building; it's now about consensus-bashing. In just the past few months, the longtime council member has mounted major attacks on projects being pushed by most, in some cases all, of his colleagues, including surveillance cameras, a streetcar network, developer subsidies, and Mercer Street improvements.
He isn't winning the big votes (not yet, at least), but he sure is making noise. The "Nick Schtick" is back. "Nick has totally marginalized himself," says colleague Jan Drago. "He's fighting alone against the issues that the rest of the council members support." For her, he's Licata non grata.
"It put me in an awkward space," Licata now says of being council president. "I had to restrain my involvement in many of the issues I care about." That's because every time he did step out, especially on issues such as the Sonics and the Alaskan Way Viaduct where he was at odds with most of his colleagues, it left citizens confused. "It's hard to speak for yourself as president," Licata explains. "The public perceives you as speaking for the council."
He admits that he didn't fully appreciate that reality before assuming the leadership post. Some council members even took him aside early on and warned him to tone down his style and turn down his volume on issues where he didn't represent a majority of his colleagues. Licata complied. "I wanted to keep the council comfortable," he says.
Keeping the calm was particularly important given that he wasn't a natural fit for the position in the first place. Licata is an activist, after all, someone who's known more for being a critic of City Hall than a champion of it. His colleagues settled on him as president only after a multi-month impasse when Jean Godden, Richard McIver, and Richard Conlin, the current president, couldn't muster the needed five votes.
Though he knew he didn't align philosophically with a majority of his colleagues, Licata worked hard to be their leader nonetheless. "I didn't change my positions, but I did change my strategy," he says. "I took a lower profile on many issues." Gone were Licata's old ways of rallying community groups and activists agitators to rise up in protest against the powers that be.
If nothing else, it was a chance for Licata to try out a different style, to play statesman — at least for a while. After all, it was only a two-year term. "I knew in my mind," he now says, "that once I left the council presidency I could be clearer and more forthright with the public."
Indeed.
Since January, when he went back to being just another council member, Licata has been on an almost non-stop community-organizing crusade to crack the consensus at City Hall. "He's up to his old tricks again," says colleague Drago, herself a former president. She's felt it first-hand. Licata stirred things up at her recent council-sponsored open houses showcasing a potential streetcar network. Not only did he pass out flyers criticizing the idea, Drago notes, but "he salted the forums with his people who are against the plan." Drago can't remember a time when a council member has tried to influence another member's forums. "He did the same thing recently with the council-sponsored budget meetings," she says.
At the community budget events, Licata's literature included a detailed critique of the $200 million "fix" of the Mercer Mess. Even though all colleagues have given the project a green light, he's working hard to reverse the decision. He argues it won't do anything for travel times in the area. He recently helped persuade the Queen Anne Community Council to come out against the proposal.
Licata also tried hard this past spring to organize opposition to a plan to extend tax breaks for developers of multi-family housing. His office sent out an email to 8,000 citizens, urging them to contact the rest of the council to stop what he saw as a giveaway.
Licata freely admits that this kind of lobbying and organizing is something that he didn't do as council president, although he always voted his conscience. He seems extremely happy to be back in the fight. "I want the community engaged and to know what's going on," says Licata.
So far, it's been a lonely crusade. On the big battles he has waged since January, Licata has been the sole "no" vote. Clearly, it's been harder for him since Peter Steinbrueck, an activist ally, left the council last year. But some of the activists in town love the revived warrior. "It's exciting," observes longtime community organizer John Fox. "He stepping out and being more assertive on issues. And he seems to be relishing the role."
Like what you just read? Support high quality local journalism by becoming a member of Crosscut.com today!








Comments:
Posted Wed, Jul 16, 6:24 p.m. inappropriate
RUN NICK!: Go for it Nick! Run for Mayor! Three years ago Al Runte ran for Mayor and received 30% of the vote, he never held a public office. We know you would win. The people who say you don't have a chance to win are the Mayor's Team supporters......Thanks for supporting and taking a stand on the issues that are very important to ALL of the taxpayers of this city.
Posted Sun, Jul 20, 1:44 p.m. inappropriate
Voting record?: I'm skeptical of Licata. He's a self-proclaimed populist. Populism is the politics of anger, and angry people almost never make good decisions.
Still, I thought I'd give him a closer look. However, I can't seem to find his (or anyone else on the council's) voting record anywhere. There is info scattered about here and there, but you'd think the city web site would have this information available in a single place - does anyone know if it is?