Enough with the SLUT jokes

It's time to take stock of the effect of all those jokes about Seattle's streetcar.

The Seattle Streetcar on Westlake Avenue, Nov. 26, 2007. (Chuck Taylor)

The Seattle Streetcar on Westlake Avenue, Nov. 26, 2007. (Chuck Taylor)

The unofficial acronym for the South Lake Union Trolley has generated a year's worth of jokes, with SLUT references appearing in media both hither and yon, and SLUT T-shirt sales brisk. The story, most likely apocryphal, is that officials made haste to change the train's name from "trolley" to "streetcar" too late, after missing the obvious public relations gaffe. Reminds me of the old story (also apocryphal) about Chevy trying to sell the Nova in Mexico without realizing that "no va" conveyed to Spanish-speaking people that the car would not run.

The key to the SLUT joke's popularity is that it's a swack at Seattle City Hall. A lot has been said about what the streetcar does and doesn't do, and the beauty of this yearlong running joke is that it's such an easy way to express one's frustration with the city. The acronym was right there, and for a city notorious for its political correctness, the naughty mirth seemed like a fresh attitude.

But somewhere along the way, as the volume of SLUT jokes grew, the original good-Seattleite-turned-cheeky spirit got replaced by something shrill, annoying, and borderline offensive. The jokes now resemble the kind of behavior that gave rise to the political correct movement itself as a reaction against expressions of hatred, cruelty, and intolerance in our society.

Lest readers now write me off as a feminazi, whatever that is, know this: Two of Crosscut's many references to SLUT are mine (here and here). There's no going back now; the streetcar is the SLUT even though what we embraced in order to make fun of our elected officials is now being used to make fun of us.

Nonetheless guilty of using the reference myself, what's alarming to me is the glee with which so many journalists invoke it, yes, most notably here at Crosscut. Just this week, we ran the headline "Seattle, you ignorant SLUT." We've explained why Seattle should embrace the name. We've even used it as an occasion to talk about famed prostitutes in Seattle history.

Crosscut reader Paige Weinheimer wrote to us this week asking us to analyze our own and others' use of the acronym, the "delight many folks still take in it," and how an "uncritical use" of the name might "create an environment that is hostile toward women." The reader was haltingly apologetic, going to great lengths to let us know that she respects Crosscut and is a fan but genuinely desires a treatment of the issue.

The thing about the word slut is that it isn't gender neutral. On the rare occasions that it is used to refer to a man, it must be qualified: "male slut," "man-whore." The jokes undeniably come at the expense of women.

Part of the allure, one could argue, in using a word like slut is that you can re-appropriate the word, take a derogatory term that's been used against you and turn it into a badge of pride. Some say it's done with the n-word, but I don't buy that. Like Richard Pryor once realized, it's been used far too often to inflict pain. Once I had to console a distraught student who'd been screamed at, her verbal attacker, a white adult male, using the n-word to intimidate her. I never saw anyone hurt so much by a single word. Part of her pain came from the shock that someone in her day and age could use it against her. She was a young college freshman, and this was 2003.

It takes time for words like these to pass into casual use, for their sting to cease. I doubt that will happen with the n-word in my lifetime (much easier to spell out "slut," for example). The word "bitch" has successfully been reclaimed by feminists who use it as a power-mantra, even as the title of a popular magazine. Bitch had wider meaning, however, beyond its role as an epithet, most importantly as a verb meaning to complain aggressively. Its path to power word was a short one. Slut is different, and not just because it's only use is as a noun (unless you're Swedish) and not a verb. Yes, it's used to refer to aficionados ("book slut"), but the jokes about Seattle's streetcar take us right back to the epithet, as in the T-shirt's slogan: "Ride the slut."

Kapow! coffee's decision to sell T-shirts immortalizing the streetcar doesn't so much bother me. I'm loathe to push for censorship in any situation, let alone a harmless ribbing directed at city leadership. But I'll pass on the shirt myself.


About the Author

Lisa Brunette is former deputy editor of Crosscut and a freelancer who published under her former name, Lisa Albers. Now she writes full-time for a Seattle video-game studio and for Crosscut and other venues when she can. Her Web site is lisa-albers.com, at least until she changes that, too.

Like what you just read? Support high quality local journalism. Become a member of Crosscut today!

Comments:

Posted Fri, Aug 15, 8:17 a.m. Inappropriate

Gender neutral language is PC at its most tedious: You're certainly entitled to be offended, Lisa, but it may be time re-examine some of the assumptions of late-80's/early 90's feminist criticism that you seem to have internalized. Most of us, thankfully, have moved on to more important things.

Sean

Posted Fri, Aug 15, 9:59 a.m. Inappropriate

the meaning of slut: Actually, it gets more interesting if you know the history of the word. For ages the word meant nothing more than a sloppy housekeeper. Remember Shakespeare's Sonnet 55 in which he refers to an untended monument being "besmeared with sluttish time"? The narrowing of its meaning to its current assumption denies what the word really means.

If we read it metaphorically in his terms, the nickname might indicate the lack of order and process in the whole transportation issue in Seattle? Heavy rail? Light rail? bus? car? Float plane? SLUT?
Spike

Posted Fri, Aug 15, 10:57 a.m. Inappropriate

Really?: I'm a little stunned actually--- The S.L.U.T usage so perfectly describes this multi million dollar tax payer boondogle-- serious wonkish Mayor sucking up to pro developement software giant, and building a "tranportation asset" favored more by tourists than residents, et el--- that the usage is more in the realm of political speech than derogatory hate speech. And there is a bit of humor in it too--seriious self centered myopic city middle and upper management types unable to see the ramifications until it bites them in the a---- sorry I should say "behind".
Take a deep breath--- its ok. Really.

Posted Fri, Aug 15, 1:33 p.m. Inappropriate

Oh: brother

Posted Fri, Aug 15, 7:14 p.m. Inappropriate

Get a life!: And, by the way, I've taken to calling the red slut "Britney," the orange one "Lindsay" and the purple one "Paris."

AW

Posted Fri, Aug 15, 7:31 p.m. Inappropriate

why bother: By now Lisa, you've probably realized your mistake. You dared to write about
something besides the environment, the city council, or transportation. Well you did try to cater to that last one, but we're not fools. What were you thinking?!

The northwest usually does a good job of hiding its white male privilege under a liberal veneer. But apparently here on Crosscut, readers and writers alike don't even have to pretend. More Steve Clifford please!!

Take your feminism elsewhere, Lisa. This audience isn't really worth your time.

Posted Fri, Aug 15, 8:25 p.m. Inappropriate

RE: why bother: I agree with the guy whose headline was, "Brother," but mine would be "Sister." I'm a big cynical fan of funny acronyms, so I was thrilled when SLUT hit the media. Especially when my son informed me about it (he lives in NYC). I was there for the inaugural ride, with several of the Seattle City Councilmembers and all the pomp + circumstance. I've ridden it one time since. Of course I didn't have the right change/money, so the attendant on board let me ride for free. Hey, I'm not a slut! But guess what? I don't call it that anymore. That is soooo yesterday. It's the Seattle Streetcar and whether I'll use it or not to go to my dental appointments, that remains to be seen. It's sorta $$$, and I could probably use the exercise.

Posted Sat, Aug 16, 11:53 a.m. Inappropriate

Chinese ladies for marriage: I don't know if anyone else noticed this before we turned it off, but yesterday for a time, the Google ad accompany this article was for a Web site advertising with the headline "Chinese Ladies for Marriage." The words "slut" and "bitch" must have triggered it. I couldn't think of a more eloquent way to underscore my point that use of the word ain't so innocent.

By the way, on the bus the other day, I overheard two women telling their children about the Seattle streetcar. "Where are we going?" one boy asked. "Ah, we're going to South Lake Union Transit [sic]," said one woman. The boy looked confused. "That bus or whatever, the big red one I pointed out to you last week," the other woman said.

I could feel that both women were thinking "the SLUT" but didn't want to say it in front of the children. I found this amusing. Crosscut Publisher David Brewster tells me that he remembers editing in a time when the standard was to opt for the word "unclad" instead of "nude" or "naked." I am no prude. I tend to the libertarian in these situations and prefer letting clear minds prevail over censorship or provisions such as this one just struck down in Oregon. We shouldn't need laws to govern civil behavior.

I'm not sure I know how to respond to most of the comments here because they're dismissive, as if the readers skimmed the article and immediately wrote me off as a feminist, as if it's a bad word. As I used to tell my students, "I'm a feminist, and I don't hate men. I'm married to one of them."

I did not call for anyone to stop using the word to describe the streetcar or for Kapow! to stop selling its T-shirts. But I think a reasonable reflection of why and how and to what effect we're using the word — especially as journalists — deserves a better response by our largely male (according to a past survey) readership.

Incidentally, I received two positive responses through e-mail from local journalists, a woman who befriended me through Facebook and a man who asked me if I'd like to write for him again. Thanks to you both for your support!

Posted Sat, Aug 16, 12:17 p.m. Inappropriate

RE: the meaning of slut: Hi Spike,

You're right, the link I used (Wikipedia) says it meant "untidy woman" as early as 1402. By the time John Gay wrote The Beggar's Opera (Restoration period, early 1700s), it's pretty clear the word is being applied to prostitutes (to great effect, I might add; that's a raunchy and brilliant play). Interesting. Falling within those 300 years is of course the reign of Queen Elizabeth, a woman whose power had an emasculating effect on the male citizenry, including its writers. Too complex a topic for this post, but thank you for raising it nonetheless! I like your metaphorical application of the earliest meanings of the word.

Posted Sat, Aug 16, 1:48 p.m. Inappropriate

RE: Chinese ladies for marriage: Acronyms can be unfortunate, and South Lake Union Trolley is a prime example. I live in Langley, home of Whidbey Island Center for the Arts. Yup, that's WICA, very close to Wicca -- the pagan, nature based religion whose members practice witchcraft. There was much grumbling and even folks who wouldn't patronize the theater due to the witchcraft association. When Googling WICA, the first entry that comes up is www.witchology.com. In hindsight, maybe the powers that be would have named it something else. Same with the South Lake Union Trolley, but it leaked out before they could change it and the media pounced on it. I'll just call it the South Lake Union Streetcar. Ridin' the SLUS sounds good to me. Glad you got this discussion going, Lisa.

Posted Sun, Aug 17, 12:02 a.m. Inappropriate

RE: the meaning of slut: It was still being used in its original sense when I lived in London at the turn of the millennium, at least by (I think it was) The Independent. Wish I could find the article now... I was surprised to see the word being used in a newspaper at all, and more so when I realized how they were using it. (If I remember correctly, it was an article, written by a woman, celebrating her complete and utter messiness at home.)

Posted Sun, Aug 17, 10:19 p.m. Inappropriate

RE: the meaning of slut: Here's another woman trying to reclaim the term, on ynetnews.com (a friend sent this to me a couple of years ago). A few notes: reader reactions are definitely mixed ... and, like the Independent article, this is also in the relationships/lifestyle section.

Posted Mon, Aug 18, 6:39 p.m. Inappropriate

WWWDWA?: It's a common saying we have here in Uncle Sam's Misguided Children (USMC) -- What Would We Do Without Accronyms? We've seen our share of Accronym oversights. I was a technician at a workcenter that was effectionately called AIDS for years. Also, there was the whole Special High Intensity Trainging (you figure it out) deal. Being in a community where the short version of "South Lake Union Trolley" wouldn't cause a second thought, nor a lot worse for that matter, I think bickering over a derogetory slang term is so petulent!

If you really want to get pissed off at the Seattle Streetcar, how about getting pissed overhow much money is wasted in our city's transit system. Or maybe I should bring up light rail? Who cares what it's called?! I got a new name for the Seattle Mass transit, the "SWoM", Seattle's Waste of Money.
tstcusmc

Posted Mon, Aug 18, 9:11 p.m. Inappropriate

Not famed prostitutes, famed businesswomen: Lisa,
In that there is a link to my piece about potential names for the SLUT cars in your bizarre complaint about the SLUT term to begin with, I feel it necessary to point out that my piece was not about famous Seattle prostitutes as you say. More careful reading, Lisa, even if it doesn't serve your point, would seem to be called for here. My suggestions for car names were in the main about those women in our history who provided female sexual interaction--not necessarily prostitutes, unless you think all strippers are prostitutes, (and if you do, I'll be hiding under this table while they take out after you.) Lou Graham, for instance, was without question one of Seattle's first great businesswomen--and the city benefited greatly from her acumen, especially the Seattle Schools. (Look it up.) Did she provide sin to the masses and thereby make a few bucks? Yes, she did, not unlike Joe Kennedy (booze) and Walter A. Annenberg (gambling), both gentlemen who have been feted throughout history and given ample opportunities, which they took, to slap their names on decent things (like a President) without public protest, or at least not much.
So there.
GPalmer

Posted Tue, Aug 19, 8:50 a.m. Inappropriate

RE: Not famed prostitutes, famed businesswomen: Point taken, Greg. I shouldn't have lumped all the women you mentioned under the title "prostitutes." Thank you for enlightening me on the nuances of "women in our history who provided female sexual interaction." That phrase really cracks me up! It trumps any pc euphemism I've ever read....

Posted Tue, Aug 19, 3:44 p.m. Inappropriate

RE: Not famed prostitutes, famed businesswomen: And like most euphemisms it's terribly non-specific (this one happens to be howlingly tautological as well). Two thoughts: I would like to see a woman who provides male sexual interaction (though I don't want to experience this personally) — and wouldn't "women who provided female sexual interaction" include most women in history, except nuns and vestal virgins?

Sorry, I'm feeling a bit punchy today....

Posted Wed, Aug 20, 7:19 p.m. Inappropriate

Old and Tired: They're still calling it SLUT? All this time later? That's just lazy. I was hoping people would be more witty and not keep clutching onto a lame joke with such a short shelf life.

schrantz

Posted Wed, Aug 20, 10:35 p.m. Inappropriate

seattle streetcar south lake union line: the beauty of the subject acronym is that it captures the Nickels-Vulcan use of scarce federal grant funds and Metro service subsidy to help Vulcan market its office buildings and condos while providing very little transit benefit. it is only 1.3 miles long and only three blocks from 15-minute headway service on Fairview and Dexter avenues North that connects pedestrians to downtown Seattle to the south and with the University District or Fremont to the north, respectively. it is as if the Seattle elected suffered from a streetcar virus. fiscal reality is the cure.

eddiew

Login or register to add your voice to the conversation.

Join Crosscut now!
Subscribe to our Newsletter

Follow Us »