The screws of Buildergate tighten on Dino Rossi

With so many Republicans bringing suit against the GOP gubernatorial candidate and two builders' groups, it's not easy to dismiss the widening case as mere partisan politics. Move the needle for incumbent Gov. Chris Gregoire, and score points for Attorney General Rob McKenna.



Dino Rossi's problems with lawsuits over possibly illegal campaign activity are getting more serious, causing us to put Gov. Chris Gregoire up a notch on the Guvometer. The Republican challenger's legal problems come at a critical time in the campaign, when people are starting to vote by absentee and fence-sitters are making up their minds.

The complicated cases have to do with activities by Rossi support groups, the Building Industry Association of Washington (BIAW) and the Master Builders Association of King and Snohomish Counties. Both have poured hundreds of thousands of dollars into the race, opposing Gregoire and pushing conservative causes. There are questions as to whether BIAW concealed a role in bundling worker compensation refunds for donation to the BIAW's political arm and whether Rossi illegally helped coordinate activities by these independent political committees. If he did so, the committee would become ineligible to make "independent expenditures" and would be limited to spending $2,800 on the candidate's race.

Rossi has been brushing off the charges as acts of political desperation. But that gets increasingly hard to claim with so many Republicans involved in bringing legal action against the groups and Rossi. Two former Washington Supreme Court justices, Faith Ireland and Robert Utter, initiated the complaints and have now upped the legal stakes by planning to sue Rossi directly for alleged improper coordination. Now a King County Superior Court judge has agreed that the plaintiffs can begin depositions (on the narrow grounds of determining whether a pre-election injunction, to stop further expenditures, should be granted). Both Ireland (appointed by Republican Gov. John Spellman) and Utter (appointed by Republican Gov. Dan Evans) are highly respected jurists, and Utter, while a Gregoire supporter, has been called "a lifelong Republican."

Also involved is Republican Rob McKenna, the state attorney general who has been bringing legal actions against the BIAW and the Master Builders. McKenna is in a race for re-election himself (though probably not a close one), and so he has been given a golden political opportunity to prove his professional independence, even though the BIAW was a generous backer of his race in 2004. Asked by his opponent, Pierce County Executive John Ladenberg, to recuse himself, McKenna said no, noting that an outside lawfirm has been brought in only once in recent years, in 1993 in a case that was a complaint against then-Attorney General Gregoire personally.

McKenna is naturally supporting Rossi for election, but his real client is the governor and state government, so he has to play it very straight. Besides, McKenna is not particularly close to Rossi and his circle. And keep in mind that the Attorney General's Office is mostly staffed with Democrats, since "very few Republicans want to work for state government," as McKenna recently explained.

What was more notable was McKenna's further lawsuit last Friday, this one aimed at the state Republican Party for allegedly spending $212,000 of soft money contributions for three mailings that urged people to "Vote for Dino Rossi." That's a no-no, since soft money can only go for administrative and party-building activities, not to promote candidates expressly. Here it gets dicey. State Party Chair Luke Esser is one of McKenna's oldest friends and political allies, stemming back to their meeting on the University of Washington campus in 1983. And in this case, McKenna said he would not be involved personally in the case any further.

Whether McKenna's zeal in bringing cases against Republicans will hurt him later with party faithful remains to be seen. Secretary of State Sam Reed, a Republican who played it straight in the protracted recount of the Rossi-Gregoire contest in 2004, seriously angered conservatives.

McKenna likes to tell the story of how former state Attorney General Slade Gorton called him up in 2004, right after Gov. Gary Locke said he wasn't going to seek a third term and Attorney General Gregoire announced she was running for governor. "That same day, Slade called and said I had to run for A.G.," recalls McKenna. "It's the best possible job." That it is. Incumbent attorneys general earn headlines in prominent cases and get many chances to prove their non-partisan professionalism, winning over independents. So while these past few weeks have been a political headache for Rossi, they have been political godsends for McKenna. Buildergate may be the toppling of one GOP candidate for governor and the making of another one in 2012.


About the Author

David Brewster is founder of Crosscut and editor-at-large. You can e-mail him at david.brewster@crosscut.com.

Like what you just read? Support high quality local journalism. Become a member of Crosscut today!

Comments:

Posted Mon, Oct 6, 5:52 p.m. Inappropriate

Republican builders for Gregoire: I have a good friend who's father is a die-hard Republican and one of the most influential real estate developers in King County. He's the kind of guy who attends Bush fundraisers at thousands of dollars per plate, and whose office features photos of various Republican presidents (including W) shaking his hand.

This summer I asked my friend if his dad knew Rossi and was planning to support him. It turns out, his dad had an extremely low opinion of Rossi based on his management and business skills, and he was planning to vote for Gregoire.
Sean

Posted Mon, Oct 6, 6:38 p.m. Inappropriate

If you cannot beat him at the polls, sue him in court.: I am that the Governor had "No Idea" Ireland and Utter were going to file suit. What difference does it make Mr. Brewster who appointed the Democratic operatives? You are not seriously trying to imply that because they were appointed under Republican Governors that either of these two are Republicans are you?

Cameron

Posted Mon, Oct 6, 6:39 p.m. Inappropriate

RE: If you cannot beat him at the polls, sue him in court.: That should read "I am sure that the Governor"

Cameron

Posted Mon, Oct 6, 6:47 p.m. Inappropriate

path to gov office passes through AG's office, again: Rossi, McKenna did not throw you under the bus, you stumbled in front of it.

Mr Baker

Posted Mon, Oct 6, 7:08 p.m. Inappropriate

Gregoires favorite campaign slogan: Lose the Debate, time to Litigate! So is she lying about "having no idea" the suit was coming? I think most reasonable people see it for what it is. Impeach Gregoire!

Cameron

Posted Tue, Oct 7, 7:40 a.m. Inappropriate

This is Serious: It might look like politics, and the timing is surely political, but this is a serious lawsuit.

The decline of investment in investigative political reporting (and decline of state political reporting generally) may be behind the cynical activities that are alleged in the lawsuit. You can call it violating laws against coordination. But when you break the law, the term that comes to mind is conspiracy. A multimillion dollar conspiracy. Hints at potential coordination have been revealed in TV campaigns that seem to compliment each other - the BIAW makes a point, the Rossi campaign reinforces it.

Where is the mainstream media on this topic? It doesn't appear that they get it. And it looks like the Rossi campaign know they don't get it.

Rossi has run an extremely cynical campaign overall this time. It could be his undoing.

Or maybe enough people will buy it.

I fear a Rossi win in a close election. Four more years of Gregoire would probably not be based on another re-election campaign for her. Four years of Rossi would probably be all about his re-elect - after barely winning.

In Rossi's case, the way he's running tells us a lot about the way he'd govern. We can probably expect a better, less political Gregoire, if she wins. We need a governor for the next four years who is more concerned about governing than winning the next time.
Tarl

Posted Tue, Oct 7, 7:45 a.m. Inappropriate

Better now than later: This matter should be resolved now. If Rossi loses, it goes away for him, but hopefully will be a lesson for BIAW (like that will ever happen). But if Rossi wins, it will dominate the discussion for most of his term. And if Ireland/Utter are correct and he is found guilty, Rossi is crippled as governor. Do it now.

chance

Posted Tue, Oct 7, 8:37 a.m. Inappropriate

RE: If you cannot beat him at the polls, sue him in court.: Utter apparently has been a Republican for years, though not supporting Rossi. I don't know about Ireland's party leanings. Both are respected nonpartisan jurists, as attested to their appointment by Republican governors. Their partisan affiliations, though probably very slight, should not devalue the merits of their lawsuits. I suspect their main motivation is to protect the campaign-finance system from abuse, and for this they should be commended.

Posted Tue, Oct 7, 10:16 a.m. Inappropriate

Why no debate coverage?: Why was there no coverage of the last Gubernatorial debate on Crosscut? That event certainly moved the needle in Rossi's direction. Gregoire even got booed by the audience a few times. The one thing that sticks in my mind is her repeated invocation of "Washington state" when referring to the political entity she's running for governor of. Would the audience somehow mistake get as a candidate for "Governor" of the District of Columbia? All I heard her saying, over and over, was "Washington state, Washington state, Washington state." That tells me she's not one of us. She thinks of this state in east coast terms. She talked like she was addressing an audience of New Yorkers. I found it tremendously alienating.

dbreneman

Posted Tue, Oct 7, 10:19 a.m. Inappropriate

What a Joke: Utter and Ireland have BOTH CONTRIBUTED TO GREGOIRE'S RE-ELECTION CAMPAIGN. You can blather all you want about them being non-partisan, but clearly they have a favored candidate. I think that is a pretty important part of this story.

You suspect their main motivation is to protect the campaign-finance system from abuse, but I suspect their main motivation is to ensure the candidate to whom they are writing checks wins the election.
Colleen

Posted Tue, Oct 7, 11:02 a.m. Inappropriate

RE: Why no debate coverage?: Huh ?

chance

Posted Tue, Oct 7, 2:12 p.m. Inappropriate

Neither is a Republican: This just in from John Carlson, the talk show host and former Republican candidate for governor:

No, Bob Utter is not a Republican, nor is Faith. Dan Evans prided himself on appointing independents and Democrats (example: Jennifer Belcher) to his administration, and Justice Utter was one of the more reliable liberal votes on the court during his tenure. Why did he leave? He was upset that the death penalty was being used again and that the court was not stopping it. Not what you'd expect from a Republican.

Posted Tue, Oct 7, 3:55 p.m. Inappropriate

Corrected: 'election,' not 're-election': In the sentence about whom Attorney General Rob McKenna supports for governor, Dino Rossi is, of course, running for election, not re-election. This has been corrected in the text.

Posted Tue, Oct 7, 4:34 p.m. Inappropriate

Investigate Much?: There are more corrections to this story than a Joe Biden term paper.

Cameron

Posted Wed, Oct 8, 12:28 p.m. Inappropriate

RE: Why no debate coverage?: "All I heard her saying, over and over, was "Washington state, Washington state, Washington state."

Most people would score a debate based on how well the participants made their arguments or refuted their opponents' arguments. You choose to decide who won based on what phrase stuck in your head and how "alienated" you were by it. To each their own I guess, but you may wish to recalibrate your debate assessment methodology.

Posted Sun, Oct 12, 7:53 p.m. Inappropriate

The 800 pound gorilla in Washington is that the main instigator of electoral fraud (the BIAW) is funded by insurance revenues properly belonging to the state, but diverted through a kickback scheme resulting from a sweetheart deal with legislators who in turn take bribes from the BIAW PACs and membership. It's a revolving door that'd make your head swim, and no one has been willing (yet) to take them on.

Despite proven money-laundering and campaign fraud over a period of decades since securing the special status, the BIAW has never been prosecuted by the Public Disclosure Commission that seems to know where it's bread is buttered.

JayTaber

Login or register to add your voice to the conversation.

Join Crosscut now!
Subscribe to our Newsletter

Follow Us »