Our Sponsors:

Read more »

Our Members

Many thanks to Paula Reynolds and Jean Darsie some of our many supporters.

ALL MEMBERS »

Voters might pull the plug on Puget Sound Energy

In light of PSE's acquisition by an overseas holding company, residents of Skagit and Jefferson counties and Whidbey Island will decide next week whether to form their own public utility districts.

There have been signs of stress from within Washington's largest power company the past few days over an incipient revolt in a small part of its service area. Officials of Puget Sound Energy made clear how very seriously they view the possibility of consumers taking control of their electrical service. Even little parts of it, serving the relatively small populations of Skagit and Jefferson counties and Whidbey Island.

Voters in those three communities will decide on Tuesday, Nov. 4, whether to create their own electric utilities — formally known as public utility districts, or PUDs — with authority to condemn and operate portions of Puget Sound Energy's production and transmission properties.

Puget Sound Energy executives and board members were already on edge, waiting for state regulators to approve a buyout of the company by an international consortium headed by Macquarie Infrastructure Partners of Australia. Public power advocates in the three counties have used the specter of foreign control as a major theme of their campaigns.

The effectiveness of the PUD organizers — endorsed by The Seattle Times a few days ago — seems to have rattled the leadership at Puget Sound Energy. President and CEO Steve Reynolds told Crosscut he's been "surprised that foreign investment became such an issue" in the public power movement. But he denied telling reporters that he might have worked harder to find a U.S. investor had he anticipated the public response. A story in the Port Townsend & Jefferson County Leader quoted Reynolds as saying, "If I had known this [foreign ownership] was going to be the headline, I would have tried to find someone closer to home."

"That's wrong," Reynolds said in an interview this week. "That's not what I said. Macquarie came to us with an offer, we didn't go looking for them. We were required to consider it on behalf of the stockholders. As the board went through a careful deliberation, they decided it was the best way we could have access to the capital we need to modernize and to keep expanding into alternative energy sources."

Reynolds gets hot under the collar at suggestions that his support for the merger derives from the executive enrichment that will follow. "I deeply resent the public power people suggesting that I'm supporting this for my own benefit," he said. "I will benefit from the increased value of the stock, as will everyone who owns shares in Puget Sound Energy. But the merger's about benefiting the customers, not making anyone rich." The CEO stands to gain some $20 million, tax-paid, in bonuses and increased stock value, with a Macquarie buyout at the agreed price of $30 per share. (Puget Sound Energy shares traded for less than $23 this week.) Reynolds says he abstained from voting on the Macquarie merger question, although he chaired the board meeting where it was approved.

Tension surfaced also at a public forum in Bellingham a few days ago. A panel of three public power advocates and Puget Sound Energy Chief Financial Officer Eric Markell were discussing the Skagit-Jefferson-Whidbey ballot questions and the proposed Macquarie takeover. A Bellingham City Club moderator asked Markell about the published reports that Reynolds was having second thoughts about the Macquarie decision. But Puget Sound Energy Board member, Craig Cole, seated in the audience, interrupted the questioning and effectively took over from Markell.

"These are decisions that were made by the board," Cole told the City Club audience, "and Eric should not be in the position of having to explain them." His action left some listeners wondering what Markell might have said if Cole hadn't stopped him.

He was trying to save Markell from being "ambushed," Cole said later in an interview. "It was the directors who [unanimously] voted to accept Macquarie's offer, and I felt I was in a better position to explain the board's action than Eric was." Cole will leave the Puget Sound Energy Board if state regulators approve the Macquarie buyout but says he voted for the history-making change as the best way to modernize the company and meet new requirements for green power.


Like what you just read? Support high quality local journalism. Become a member of Crosscut today!

Comments:

Posted Sun, Nov 2, 2:22 p.m. Inappropriate

All over the world, neighborhoods and businesses are becoming loosely-coupled from the traditional grid using fuel cells. Metro King County recently set up a demo system in Tukwila using wastewater heat to produce electricity.

Rather than worrying about creating more big ticket electrical generation communities should be thinking about local power generation.

I recommend Fuel Cell Energy, http://www.fuelcellenergy.com/, (I own a few shares of stock in this company) because they can generate electricity from natural gas and a host of waste by products.

jabailo

Posted Thu, Nov 6, 6:54 a.m. Inappropriate

It is no wonder that Puget Sound Energy executives and board members are in favor of this sale. They will ALL make a LOT of money from it. There is no reason for the sale otherwise and as a sharholder I am extremely dissappointed that the majority voted for this sale. It seems criminal but it's all legal. I hope other communities join in the revolt.

I've owned shares of PSD for years and while dividends have been consistent there has been nothing spectacular done that would justify the board memebers and company executives to make millions of dollars. Something is wrong.

Elroy

elroy

Login or register to add your voice to the conversation.

Join Crosscut now!
Subscribe to our Newsletter

Follow Us »