go to mobile version »

Most Commented

Crosscut articles of the past 10 days with the most reader comments.

ALL COMMENTS »

2008 Election »

 

Creator unknown

"Toto, I have a feeling we're not in Alaska anymore."

 

On the eve of the denouement

Some final thoughts on a long, hard campaign and the likely long, hard challenges ahead for whoever wins tomorrow.

Here are election-eve observations after time spent in Arizona, New Jersey, and North Carolina, as well as at home — and conversations with analysts in other states — over the past two weeks.

A big wave is building

You can see the coming Tuesday trend in the presidential candidates' schedules over the past fortnight.

Illinois Sen. Barack Obama has been campaigning in marginal and red (Republican-leaning) states and is given a chance to win several that President Bush carried four years ago. Arizona Sen. John McCain has been concentrating on key electoral states (Ohio, Florida) and even on a state (Pennsylvania) where Obama is presumed to have a double-digit lead. Always a gambler, McCain is hoping to surprise in that electoral-rich state to remain competitive.

In his home state of Arizona, McCain is leading by only a few percentage points. He will return there to campaign today, Nov. 3. In a normally Republican Arizona congressional district, I found Democratic activity to be intense and a Democrat given an even chance to win the open congressional seat. In North Carolina, normally Republican in national elections, I found a toss-up situation between Obama and McCain. Incumbent Republican Sen. Elizabeth Dole, running a desperate, negative campaign, appeared on the verge of losing her seat. In New Jersey, I spent time in a marginal congressional district where new voter registrations (mainly Democratic) and Obama volunteer activity and lawn signs were the story of the day.

The fundamentals matter

The Bush administration's unpopularity, the mid-campaign economic/financial crisis (favoring Democrats), Obama's huge campaign-money advantage (up to 3- and 4-to-1 in key states down the stretch), and a highly professional Obama organizational effort all have provided Obama-Biden and Democratic congressional candidates with a big advantage in the fundamentals which make the difference between winning and losing.

If a national security crisis had arisen a month ago, rather than a financial meltdown, McCain would have benefited and might even have had a solid chance to win. But that did not happen. Moreover, the McCain-Palin campaign has been one of the most scattered and least professional I have seen over the past 20 years.

What comes next?

After the euphoria wears off, Obama will need, post-haste, to tell the American people and Congress that the tough financial/economic climate means that the 2009 agenda will by necessity have to be limited. Nationally — just as at state and local level here in Washington — big new spending programs will be impossible. Small tax cuts may be necessary for short-term stimulus, but not so large as to add to the huge public and private debt burdens the country now faces.

Obama and McCain have had differences over Iraq. But the imperative there will be clear and unrelated to partisanship. As soon as the political/security situation there seems to have stabilized — certainly sometime in 2009 — the U.S. will begin withdrawal. No one knows what will happen after that. With luck, an Iraqi government will be able to maintain order and to govern passably. Without luck, old divisions could lead to turmoil and even a civil war (almost certainly to be won by Shiites, who comprise 60 percent of the population and who would be supported by Iran). Either way, we would not return.

Politically, both U.S. parties will face huge challenges. Obama and a heavily Democratic Congress could come into conflict if more liberal congressional leaders push for an agenda Obama cannot support. Democrats conceivably could get a 60-40 majority in the U.S. Senate, which could bring its own problems if bipartisanship is not sought to address the financial/economic crisis.

Obama appears likely to appoint either a Republican Defense secretary or secretary of State. That, too, might not sit well with congressional Democrats.

The Republican Party needs to go through a period of rethinking and redefinition. Among this year's national candidates, only former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney and Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin appear likely to play important continuing roles. Palin was much derided during her vice-presidential campaign but has political talent and a chance to be a force in her party over the next four years. At the congressional level, Republicans will be decimated and demoralized. Yet it is after one-sided defeats that political parties most often do reappraisals they would not do otherwise.

Obama and congressional Democrats will over the next four years face daunting challenges which they must face with limited resources. Bush-Cheney will not be on the scene to assume blame for failures. The heat in the kitchen will be wholly on Democrats.

None

Like what you just read? Support high quality local journalism by becoming a member of Crosscut.com today!


Comments:

Posted Mon, Nov 3, 7:33 a.m. inappropriate

A debtor nation resolutely opposed to "change" stands to elect a candidate who campaigned on a "change" intended to maintain arrangements that have already "changed." A dose of lower expectations is badly needed.

Posted Mon, Nov 3, 7:51 a.m. inappropriate

I agree with Mr. Van Dyk that the Republicans need to retool their party. Speaking as an Independent voter, I can't vote for a party that is leaning further and further right. I think the Republican party would benefit from jettisoning the Religious Right. Let Palin lead that faction of the newly formed party and return to a more moderate conservatism--and I mean an un-Bush-like conservatism. Should the Republicans remain so far right, they certainly won't motivate me--and no doubt other Independents like me--to vote for their party's far-flung candidates.

And yes, it's good to know that the Rovian idea of Republican dominance through darkness has toppled into decay and ruin for the party. What a creep-laden reign. One can't help but think that to rule by fear is not only loathsome, manipulative, and depressingly tiring, it also eats into the heart and soul of our country's being. The Bush administration comes out of these eight preposterous years shame-drenched and carrying the weight and responsibility of their murky and disastrous incompetence. Deservedly so.

I am confident and jubilant that in this election hope has trumped fear. I can only hope it sets a precedent.

-Political

Posted Mon, Nov 3, 9:09 a.m. inappropriate

Sarah would do her party a favor by going back to college for the next four years and picking up an international studies degree with a minor in english. You betcha.

Posted Mon, Nov 3, 12:42 p.m. inappropriate

Responding to comments by Political and dn, the democratic process has a way of refreshing itself. Republicans, since 1980, have ridden along on the memory of Ronald Reagan just as Democrats, for many years, lived off Franklin Roosevelt's memory. Then, in time, jarring reversals force reexaminations. I expect Sarah Palin, for example, to be important in the Republican Party over the next four years---as a representative of a kind of populism---but not ever to become its Presidential nominee. Not only Mitt Romney but several younger governors, such as Minnesota's Tim Pawlenty, are likely to step up. Romney and Pawlenty, by the way, both have experience as moderate Republicans governing Democratic states---important preparation for eventual national success.

Posted Mon, Nov 3, 1:24 p.m. inappropriate

I don't think it's so much a reconsideration of Reagan as it is of the religious right which rode into prominence on his coat tails. They never enjoyed the broad popularity that Reagan himself did (and Reagan himself rarely gave them more than lip service). Many of them are annoying fall-on-you-sword single issue voters who alienated most of the libertarian and business wings of the party with their stridency on their "values agenda" coupled with complete ambivalence towards genuinely important constitutional issues like limited government and personal freedom. The result was George W Bush, a "conservative" in the "values" sense only, and a big-government Nixonian Tory in every other. I was active in Pierce County GOP politics in the 80s, then quit the party after the death of Ben Bettridge, when the "Jesus Nazis" became impossible to deal with.

Posted Mon, Nov 3, 7:41 p.m. inappropriate

Continuing on the thread of Van Dyk, DN, and Political -

Sending the Republican Party back to school might not be a bad idea - way better than back to church.

Unfortunately our educational institutions have become as moribund as Washington D.C., when they ought to be both practically and intellectually leading the way.

Sending older folks who still have the demonstrated ability to innovate may be just what everyone needs...

And, FWIW, Obama's going to have to work damn hard to avoid the sub-20% approval rating the 2006 Democratic congress now shares with Bush.

Join Crosscut now! Subscribe to Newsletter About Crosscut Advertise Web Feeds