Toll-booth-free tolling on SR 520 and I-90
As early as 2010, the east-west transportation corridor could see a return to the pay-as-you-go model, done without the slowdown of a toll booth.
The State Route 520 Tolling Implementation Committee's "November Scenario Evaluation" document (pdf) released last week shows that the most robust regional financing for replacing the dangerously sub-par 520 bridge comes from time-variable tolling starting in 2010 and tolling the parallel I-90 span across Lake Washington, starting in 2010 or 2016. Tolling in this key east-west corridor would be done on the fly, electronically, with vehicle windshield transponders and overhead gantries — no toll booths. Tolls that vary by time of day are likely, though flat rates are also an option. Special lanes that would be free to buses and ride-sharers could be made available to solo drivers, for a price.
The committee's members are WSDOT Secretary Paula Hammond, Puget Sound Regional Council Executive Director Bob Drewel, and Washington State Transportation Commission board member Richard Ford. This latest analysis, along with public comment, will inform a January 2009 final report from the committee to the state legislature, which is then to approve a tolling plan for the SR 520 bridge and perhaps the I-90 bridge as well. Then, specific toll rates would be set by the state transportation commission and approved by the legislature, with construction of pontoons for the new 520 bridge beginning later in 2009 if all goes as envisioned.
The weary and crowded 1963-vintage 520 bridge connects Seattle with Eastside job centers such as Bellevue, Redmond, and Kirkland but is at major risk of catastrophic failure in a 70 mph windstorm, or earthquake. At the same time, growing regional traffic congestion has prompted a public warming to expansion of regional transit, and bettered the odds for a system of electronic, time-variable tolling on major highways and state routes across metro Puget Sound. A priced-lanes pilot project for carpoolers and solo drivers is already underway on SR 167, and flat-rate electronic tolling in place, to rave reviews, on the new southbound span of the Tacoma Narrows Bridge.
The 520 tolling committee's latest report reveals that:
Tolling opponents somehow imagine they are due a free ride because the construction, maintenance, and operations costs of Puget Sound roads and bridges, as population continues to swell in coming decades, can somehow all be covered by the incredible shrinking gas tax and ... what? More sales tax hikes or vehicle fees? They're nice if you can get 'em, but the well only runs so deep.
Pay as you go is the way to go in this day and age — coupled with cost-saving, performance-based consortium contracting to design, build, operate, and maintain surface transportation facilities and systems.
The four-lane SR 520 bridge across the lake is to be replaced with a six-lane structure. Current plans call for two "general purpose" lanes and one high-occupancy vehicle lane in each direction, the former would be tolled via either a flat or time-variable rate if a plan is adopted. This is confirmed by WSDOT, though it can get a bit confusing because one doesn't necessarily think of general purpose lanes as being tolled. On the I-90 bridge, the agency also confirms, tolling would be on all general purpose vehicle lanes, except under one scenario that exempts eastbound traffic from Mercer Island. On both bridges the possible HOV lane could be designated a High Occupancy and Toll (HOT lane), free to transit and ride-share vehicles, but also available, for a toll, to solo drivers.
The more time-variable tolling, and the sooner, the better: It will further drive alternative choices such as ride-sharing and telework, and raise more money for regional surface transportation needs, transit included.
Like what you just read? Support high quality local journalism by becoming a member of Crosscut.com today!








Comments:
Posted Tue, Nov 18, 7:18 a.m. inappropriate
The narrows bridge is making it's anticipated usage number and they are still raising rates (again) after they said they would not. What are the chances that in an up and down business cycle there may be times ( Months, Years?) that usages will dip below expectations and users will be hit with higher fees? Will they go down as quickly as they go up? Or once up will they be allocated to "other projects" in the corridor as they are allowed to be under the tolling suthorization statute?
Posted Tue, Nov 18, 8:50 a.m. inappropriate
First of all the "no toll booths" claim is a little bit far-fetched. They've had electronic tolling in the SF Bay Area for a good decade - including at first discounts for those using the electronic toll lanes - and there's still lines of cars waiting at toll boths, since not everyone will think ahead and order the device. These crowds can and do line up long enough to slow down all traffic.
Secondly, I think the grand scheme of tolling everything and having it run by private companies is a terrible idea. Yes, we can probably avoid selling our souls IF we write the contracts just right, but we all know this will turn into a corporate subsidy.
That being said, I'm a proponent of tolling both bridges using an electronic variable tolling scheme. Just make sure it's state employees collecting those tolls.
Posted Tue, Nov 18, 11:47 a.m. inappropriate
I'm with Matt on this one. If there is no toll booth at all how will those coming from across the mountains once or twice a year pay their toll? Is the thought to photograph the license plate and then mail them a bill? Not efficient is my guess - let alone privacy concerns up the wazzu. I'm all in favor of tolling the bridges, just don't try to sell me on it by claiming that there will be no toll booths at all. There will be transponders for those who wish to purchase them, but the toll booth will be back, count on that.
Posted Wed, Nov 19, 3:58 p.m. inappropriate
Tired of Supporting Seattle!
Another Dumb idea of the Northwest. This is simply a way of raising CASH. You believe this Plan then you bought the idea that light rail was going to be built from Seattle to Tacoma. It got as far as the airport and then the money ran out. The same type of people set the Tolls for the new bridge to Gig Harbor and then raise it each year. How about a fence around Seattle and let the people living there pay for their own ideas?
Posted Thu, Feb 4, 4:26 p.m. inappropriate
We could save an additional 200 Million plus interest if the State would drop the Sales Tax on the project.
Instead the professional services tax being added in Olympia on people like engineers, lawyers, environmental consultants are all going to add millions more for the taxpayers to pick up and finance.