go to mobile version »

Newspapers »

 
Seattle Times front page.
 

Seattle Times Co. struggles with its debt

A deal is close for selling its Maine papers, and the company is trying to peddle some of its real estate in Seattle. Meanwhile, McClatchy, owners of nearly half of the Times Co., continue to write down its stake dramatically.

When the Seattle Times Co. announced Nov. 12 that it had signed an agreement to sell its Blethen Maine newspaper chain to an investor group, Maine Media Investments, sighs of relief could be heard on both coasts. Blethen Maine’s debt is dragging down the Times Co.’s entire operation, and the Maine group, which includes the Portland Press Herald, the state’s largest newspaper, and two smaller dailies, continues to hemorrhage cash.

Another recent piece of Seattle Times Co. financial news raises cautionary flags about the viability of the Maine deal and the Times company's overall financial future. In its quarterly federal securities filing Nov. 7, McClatchy Co., which owns 49.5 percent of the Times Co., said it was continuing to write down the value of its stake. McClatchy’s latest valuation puts its Times Co. share at just $7.9 million at the end of the September reporting period. That’s about 6 percent of the $120 million value McClatchy put on its share of the Times Co. two years ago when it bought out the previous owner, Knight Ridder.

McClatchy has been steadily devaluing its shares of the Times Co., according to the Sacramento-based media giant’s quarterly filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. (The Times Co., which is privately held, doesn’t disclose its financial data.) The figures point to a potentially stunning drop in the value of the Seattle Times Co., possibly one of the worst performers in a troubled newspaper industry. Consider that four years ago newspaper broker Dirks, Van Essen & Murray — the same broker engineering the current Blethen Maine sale — put a back-of-the-envelope street value on the Times Co. of $900 million, if the company’s majority owners, the Blethen family, decided to sell. The Blethens, then locked in a nose-to-nose fight with Hearst, owner of The Post-Intelligencer, had no intention of selling. Back then, the estimate indicated that in asset terms, at least, the Blethens were flush.

McClatchy's minority stake gives it virtually no say over Times Co. decisions, which are controlled by the Blethens. That substantially lowers the street value of McClatchy’s stake, compared to the Blethens’ 50.5 percent share of the company. Both McClatchy and Times Co. officials say that attempting to estimate the worth of the Blethens' share of the Times Co. can’t be done by extrapolating from McClatchy’s side of the ledger. Still, if the McClatchy share has dropped 94 percent in the past two years, it's a fair assumption that the Blethens' share is also down sharply.

The Times Co. owns a considerable pile of hard assets, including daily newspapers in Seattle, Yakima, and Walla Walla, Rotary Offset Press in Kent (which prints, among other things, the Northwest edition of The New York Times), and 10 acres of real estate in the South Lake Union neighborhood. Blethen Maine’s real estate is assessed on the public rolls at about $30 million, according to union officials in Maine.

Lacking real financial figures, it's not known how long the Blethen family can (or will want to) continue to ride the downward trajectory. Frank Blethen has said in the past that the family would consider selling its Times Co. stake if financial pressures become unbearable. Times' staffers say the company's future has become a considerable distraction in the paper's newsroom.

Times Co. officials have said in federal court affidavits that the company faces default on Times Co. loans if the Blethen Maine chain can’t be sold quickly. The company’s debt-holders have already forced two real estate sales during previous loan restructurings and are pressing the Times to sell half its valuable South Lake Union real estate to cover more of its outstanding debt, despite its being a bad time to fetch a good price for commercial real estate.

It's also a terrible time to get financing for these purchases. That may explain why the Times Co. announced its signing with MMI but omitted two key elements: a sale price and any explanation of how the prospective buyers are planning to finance the deal. According to a Portland Press Herald story, Richard Connor, the Wilkes-Barre, Pa., publisher who heads MMI, was still searching for financial backers after the announcement. That could be tough, since Connor must find someone willing to put up cash for a small newspaper group in a stagnant market in an imploding industry. While the Maine papers' major union, the Portland Newspaper Guild, has encouraged Connor, offering tradeoffs on the union’s four-year contract in exchange for MMI board seats, union officials told Crosscut they don’t plan to put any cash into the deal. The purchasers might also try to sell off the real estate quickly as a way to help finance the acquisition.

Selling Blethen Maine would cut the Blethen's debt load, but the Times Co. will still have to scramble to pay down loans that by some estimates total well over $100 million. Meanwhile, the Times Co. here at home has fallen back on the painful route of cutting staff. The most recent round affected 150 Seattle Times staffers, and some in the paper report being told to expect another round of cuts in February.

Bill Richards is a former Wall Street Journal and Washington Post reporter who covered the Seattle newspapers' joint operating agreement for The Seattle Times under a three-year contract that ended in 2005. He also worked for the Seattle Post-Intelligencer in 1990-91. You can e-mail him in care of editor@crosscut.com.


Comments:

Posted Mon, Nov 24, 3:40 p.m. inappropriate

Reader Jack Swanson send in this comment:

I think you are misleading your readers by not pointing out the importance -- or relative lack thereof -- of McClatchy's self-interest in the write-downs of the value of its 49.5 percent share of the Times. It derives tax benefits by showing losses in Times stock, which it doesn't have to substantiate. The more loss it shows, the less in taxes it has to pay on profits from other enterprises.
McClatchy is obviously gambling that the Times's value will continue to decline -- which, of course, may not be a bad bet. But if the Times were really worthless, McClatchy would sell in a flash.

Posted Mon, Nov 24, 5:31 p.m. inappropriate

True, some companies choose to accelerate writedowns for tax purposes, especially when they can take the loss against profit from other assets. McClatchy neither needs the Times Co.'s plummeting carrying value to produce a writedown--they have far larger losses on their other, much larger, Knight Ridder acquisitions--nor are they showing any profit from other assets to take advantage of the writedown. As far as selling their Times Co. stake in a flash, CEO Gary Pruitt, among other McClatchy executives, has publicly said he'd love to unload the Times Co. stake if they can find someone--anyone--to take it off their hands. So far, no takers.

Posted Mon, Nov 24, 7:56 p.m. inappropriate

The McClatchy writedowns of their interest in the Seattle Times is probably driven by their outside auditors. It is reasonable in this market to assume the McClatchy interest is worthless and the auditors are pushing them to mark assets to market, otherwise their financial statements would be misleading to investors, lenders and others who must rely on them. Brewster may be correct that there is a tax benefit although McClatchey barely made a profit in the third quarter. They should also have loss carryforwards for tax purposes from a very bad year in 2007.

Posted Mon, Nov 24, 10:28 p.m. inappropriate

Richards: Exactly. Who would want to buy a minority stake in something "worthless"?

Posted Tue, Nov 25, 6:31 a.m. inappropriate

In this environment, who would want to buy the majority stake in something "worthless"?

Posted Fri, Nov 28, 10:59 a.m. inappropriate

The longer this deal goes to buy the Maine properties, the more remote it looks. After this mortgage debacle, banks are only going to back viable enterprises, and not concerns that look troubled from the get-go. Private money has evaporated, perhaps seeing the possibilities of greater returns in the beaten-down stock market. IMO, this "deal" was a fraud, designed to beat back creditors who now want the Blethens to pay their debts. I am reaading stories that advertisements are off 13-15 percent this Christmas season, normally the best period a year for newspaper revenues. Blethen could make some more cuts (why is Ryan still pumping out these truly flaky columns?), but I think the end is nigh. If I were an enthusiastic buyer of the Maine properties (which I would not be), I would wait and pick up the papers at a bankruptcy sale that is coming. And bankruptcy for these blustering brigands is just weeks away.

Posted Tue, Dec 2, 8:41 p.m. inappropriate

Now the Maine blogs are reporting the drop dead date for the sale of Blethen Maine papers is Dec. 27. Since I suspect Blethen has tied the future of the Seattle Times and other Blethen papers to his Maine purchases, this could make for a very interesting New Years Eve in bankruptcy court. Looks like time is running out on Blethen's bluster. By the way, what happened to the property sale in Seattle that some earlier post here promised would happen about now?

Posted Wed, Dec 3, 5:15 p.m. inappropriate

Edward--Times Co. officials have told Blethen Maine employees they need to get the sale done by Dec. 27 to take advantage of the tax loss from the deal. If they get it done before the year ends they can then apply the Blethen Maine loss to offset profit from the South Lake Union real estate sale.
Richards

Subscribe to Newsletter About Crosscut Advertise Web Feeds