Making sense of unprecedented times
Despite all the economic turmoil and the rapid pace of the transition, Obama is inspiring confidence, and the outlines of his first year are taking shape.
This is unprecedented. The Obama presidential transition is pushing forward actively while the outgoing Bush administration still has nearly two full months in office. The reason is obvious: Financial and economic distress could turn into panic unless President Bush and President-elect Obama, Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson, and Treasury Secretary-designate Tim Geithner are perceived as cooperating and if the new Obama team does not appear quickly to be taking hold. This is in dramatic contrast to previous transitions in which appointments and first-term decisions were unveiled a month or more later.
After January 20, things will be sorted out. Between now and then, though, federal money and loans will continue to be pumped into the system as necessary to maintain liquidity and to avert failures by cornerstone financial houses. Detroit auto executives will return to the capital next week with the "plan" requested by Congess as a condition of granting $25 billion in loans to the industry. After much grandstanding all around, the so-called plan probably will be given conditional acceptance and the money committed. Everyone knows the industry will burn most of the money for operating expenses but no wants responsibility for a failure of General Motors, Ford, or Chrysler early in 2009. If it does not happen next week, some variant of it will happen pronto in the new administration.
Meanwhile, it will be a gloomy holiday season for retailers. Consumers have lost equity in their homes, seen their retirement and other accounts lose value, and are properly nervous about events in the months ahead. Low-end retailers such as Wal-Mart should do OK. The yachts and diamonds crowd will keep on spending. But middle-range retailers, as with their customers, will be hard pressed. That explains all the pre-Christmas discount sales before Thanksgiving.
At the same time, financial markets are likely to remain volatile and unpredictable. Day-to-day events will continue to trigger swings of 300-400 points daily in the Dow Jones industrial average. The average is unlikely to hit 10,000 again in 2008. Offshore economies and financial markets also are worrisome. CDs and mattresses may appear for a time to be the only safe harbors for savers and investors.
Given all this bad news, let us pretend it is now January 21 and a President Obama and his economic team are fully in charge. What will they and ordinary Americans see? The public and private sectors will be awash in debt which will constrain both public and private initiatives during at least the next four years. An economic recession and relatively high unemployment (though not approximating the 30 percent unemployment during the Great Depression) will prevail. Unemployment is unlikely to reach 10 percent but it will be substantially above the 6 percent thought "normal."
Although the federal government has pumped money into the system, financial institutions nonetheless will be conservative in granting new credit. Credit-dependent business sectors will slow. Expansions will be deferred or cancelled. Work forces will be reduced. The housing correction will continue for at least a year, though perhaps not as sharply as over the past few months. State governments, which (except for Vermont) by statute must keep their budgets in balance, will be particularly hard hit. They do not have the luxury, as the federal government, of just printing cash to keep things running.
Bottom line: We do not face a replay of the Great Depression. But the new administration and the rest of us face what surely will be our largest financial/economic challenge since then. So what should be the Obama administration's first steps? Here are my best guesses:
First, liquidity will continue to be created as the financial system needs it. Business-sector rescues will be considered on a case-by-case basis, with "too big to fail" being the rule of thumb. Next, a short-term stimulus package will be enacted, with early emphasis on infrastructure spending (roads, bridges, water and electrical systems, public buildings) which will put money and jobs into local economies. Third, Obama's 2008 promises of trade protection will not be kept. Such steps led directly to the 1930s global crisis. Moreover, his principal economic appointees all lean to the free-trade side and will tell Obama that the campaign was then and governance is now. Finally, Obama's 2008 campaign promises will have to be pared back. Planning will begin on health care reform and greater energy efficiency, but formal legislative proposals are unlikely to be offered early in the new president's term. The same will be true of Social Security and Medicare reform, both long overdue. Bipartisan task forces no doubt will examine options for reform — they have been well known for a decade — but no formal fixes will be offered in 2009.
Many have observed that President Franklin Roosevelt's first months in office in 1933 were filled with fresh proposals, but they all dealt with one thing, the economic crisis. The landmark achievement of his first term, Social Security, was not enacted until 1935. So it will probably prove with Obama.
Like what you just read? Support high quality local journalism by becoming a member of Crosscut.com today!








Comments:
Posted Wed, Nov 26, 8:38 a.m. inappropriate
Excellent piece, Mr. Van Dyk. Yes, there is plenty of blame to go around--and plenty of denial. One BIG reason for the financial crisis, as Paul Krugman, the 2008 winner of the Nobel Prize in Ecomomics, points out, is Mr. Phil Gramm and his two big Acts. Recently, I read an article on Mr. Gramm, and he is so in denial, so much so, that he insists he would push through these Acts of legislation again. What did he do? This:
Gramm orchestrated the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act in 1999 which “destroyed the Depression-era barrier to the merger of stockbrokers, banks and insurance companies.” He also pushed the Commodity Futures Modernization Act in 2000, which made legal “the mortgage swaps distancing the originator of the loan from the ultimate collector.”
Intelligent idiot that Mr. Gramm is, I suppose it must be difficult to face up to the fact that pushing through his personal agenda and belief system has sent the world's interlocked financial systems eventually spiraling downward.
Others too, high up in the food chain don't seem to realize the game is up, and they continue to spend as if there was indeed no financial crisis to begin with. Witness the dim bulbs driving the Big Three or at the top of the AIG ladder, still spending while the responsible you and I's bail them out. More intelligent idiots in denial. And I'm tired of it.
I personally approve of the way that some executives at UBS, the Swiss Banking company, are giving up more than 27 million dollars in pay, though I still don't think it's enough. However, of the many big questions out there right now, one in particular fires up the smitten: Why in the hell do executives of these major bailout-supported companies continue to think that they're entitled to executive bonuses and perks? Hello? Wake up, little Susie. Your leadership, greed, and poor practices have lead us to this financial precipice. And why should we, the American taxpayers, reward you?
Please. I hope you choke on your Thankgiving Day bird.
-Political
Posted Wed, Nov 26, 1:28 p.m. inappropriate
Thanks, political. I omitted mention of former Fed Chair Alan Greenspan, who facilitated the bubble, and following chaos, with several years of permissive policies at the Fed. Bernanke has inherited the wreckage.
Posted Wed, Nov 26, 8:35 p.m. inappropriate
"Careless oversight by federal regulatory agencies"?!
It was deliberate refusal to regulate or provide oversight! Regulatory laws were willfully overturned or ignored.