Memo to city pols: times are tough

While the rest of us tighten our belts, the Mayor and City Council pass around pay increases and raise fees. Hello?

'Hammering Man' is a cheerless drudge.

Chuck Taylor

'Hammering Man' is a cheerless drudge.

At a time when CEOs from the major financial institutions and the auto industry are being interrogated at congressional hearings over their performance, Seattle’s version of the CEO, the Mayor and City Councilmembers, could also stand a little scrutiny. They have just passed a budget for that shows little evidence that the top City salaries will suffer. Alas, there will be no congressional hearings to determine the wisdom of Seattle’s spending decisions in this meltdown economy.

Seattle officials have, in recent months, been smugy believing our local economy has escaped the deep turmoil of the rust belt states. They also seem to believe, like the ill-fated monorail, that Seattle “will rise above it all” and escape the financial catastrophe elsewhere. It’s fair to ask if they have tightened their belts enough to respond to the short fall in expected City revenue.

We are now experiencing the full impact of WaMu layoffs and downsizing of hundreds of other Seattle area employers. While local businesses and the public are feeling the pinch, Seattle decision makers seem much less concerned.

Consider that the City just passed an increase in spending. Seattle’s budget for 2009, will be $3.9 billion. The general fund, which pays for most City functions, is $910 million, up 1.6 percent from 2007, and is projected to rise to $925 million in 2010. To fund the increase, the City will raise parking fees, raise the garbage rates 42 percent and water rates by 38 percent to help pay for the increase in spending. At the same time, it will reduce city revenues with property tax deferments to developers.

Mayor Greg Nickels also just announced that a Seattle top administrator needs a 37 percent pay raise to $302,000 per year. So, is spending on City employees getting out of hand, particularly in a time when many others are making salary sacrifices? Let's take a look.

The total City payroll is $743,195,514. The average pay is $66,356.74 each, or about the salary of a Seattle cop. (This does not include retirement or medical benefits.) Seattle public employee pay is near the top in the nation. According to the US Department Of Labor and Statistics, Seattle City workers are paid nearly 20 percent more than private sector employees. While Seattle has some of the finest public employees in the nation, they come at a very high price. Of the 11,201 city employees — up from 10,300 in 2004 — there are 689 employees that make more than $100,000 a year.

Another advantage in working for the City is generous retirement and health care in which City employees have major advantages over their counterparts in private industry. Public employees also have more job security than in private industry. One can easily see why the jobs in government and health care are among the two fastest-growing job markets in America.

Seattle's budget philosophy in recessions appears to be to raise city salaries, to look for big spending items on beautification projects, and to defer maintenance or push maintenance of the most popular projects (such as the Market or Seattle Center) to special levies. Seattle currently has a huge obligation in deferred maintenance for everything from bridges to water mains to roads. The City needs to decide whether to take care of deferred maintenance first or to buy new stuff and raise fees and taxes to do it. How many construction jobs are produced for each beautification or transportation project, and do the benefits end up where we need them the most?

Here are some examples of the City's budget philosophy in action. The City just approved an improvement to Paul Allen’s neighborhood to beautify the Mercer corridor. That will cost $230 million but only shorten commute times by three to five minutes. On top of that, the City still needs $80 million more for phase 1 of Mercer Corridor work. Meanwhile, to raise more money for the City coffers the Mayor plans to put parking meters in neighborhood business districts. There are few small businesses which can survive with walk-in customers in good times, and in this economic environment adding high-price parking is a killer for small businesses.

Or take another example: the City just approved the concept of a streetcar system that, while cute, will actually reduce existing bus service levels and compete with Sound Transit’s light rail extension to the University district. The cost for a full expansion of Portland-style streetcars would be $685 million.

A major share of our City revenue comes from property tax, so does it make sense for the City Council to authorize one of the worlds richest men, Paul Allen, to enjoy the multi-family tax exemption to build in South Lake Union? In still another program, the Mayor and Council offered tax deferments on property tax if developers will build new apartment buildings which will rent far above what poor folks can afford and are likely buildings they planned to build anyway.

While the rest of the country appears to recognize that there will be record numbers of folks out of work, many taking pay cuts, others downsizing, our leaders are doing the opposite. They will create special levies to take care of deferred maintenance and raise the salaries of the top administrators. If they ever do make cuts it will be from the workers at the bottom end of the salary scale who do the actual work.


About the Author

Kent Kammerer is the unofficial leader and official scribe of the informal, non-partisan Seattle Neighborhood Coalition, which meets over breakfast once a month to discuss Seattle policy and politics.

Like what you just read? Support high quality local journalism. Become a member of Crosscut today!

Comments:

Posted Mon, Dec 22, 8:13 a.m. Inappropriate

The relevant phrase of the moment may well be "other people's money" - whether it public or private, Seattle based or nationwide. Bernie Madoff and Henry Paulson share a common trait an arrogance in their financial stewardship.

The question that comes to my mind is whether there is a connection between the financial-political practices in Downtown Seattle funding and the decline in corporate management's responsibility.

I think there is, though I'm probably not the person to take the case to a jury.

The tougher question is just how much Seattle is responsible for setting the bar for fiscal irresponsibility - did Microsoft set the bar for internet failures of 2000. Did WAMU pioneer the sub-prime pratices that led to the current melt-down?

I'm not an expert on such matters, but it is safe to say that although we are cleaner than most governments in some regards there are others where we are likely worse.

The Detroit autoworker level salaries of Seattle Bureaucrats may well be nothing more than an extortion payoff for their complicity in thefts of the public and corporate shareholders purse.

High pay is great, but if the requirement for receiving that pay is signing off on the thefts from others it's still theft, even if you have 51% of the population receiving the benefits.

Seattle, your constitutional and financial bill is due.

Posted Mon, Dec 22, 11:58 a.m. Inappropriate

Kent,
Your piece suffers from factual errors as well an obvious misunderstanding of city housing programs, the area’s transit system and Seattle’s road construction program. Here are a few facts to help clarify things.

There is a multi-family tax exemption program that all developers in certain geographic areas can participate in. The law allows Vulcan Real Estate to use that program, which is backed by affordable housing advocates. Your suggestion that this was some sort of special program for Paul Allen is clearly wrong.

The street car doesn’t mean less bus service. The expansion that’s funded wouldn’t go to the University. And other than the voter-approved money from Proposition 1, there is no funding to expand the streetcar network.

As for Mercer, you exaggerate the funding gap and minimize benefits of fixing the Mess.

Tough times are hitting Seattle just like every city in the country. It’d behoove all of us to rely more on facts and try to avoid rhetoric that does little to solve problems.

David Postman
Vulcan Inc.

Postman

Posted Mon, Dec 22, 3:23 p.m. Inappropriate

Kent is absolutely correct about the streetcars and Mercer "improvement" project being boondoggles. The Mercer project will actally make travel times eastward in the afternoons much longer then they are now. It is not a transportation project at all, and is purely a prettification project, despite the lame potestations above by one of Paul Allens lackeys. It very clearly does NOT "fix" the "Mercer Mess."

Lincoln

Posted Mon, Dec 22, 3:36 p.m. Inappropriate

The irony of a paid Vulcan flack calling out Kent K. for factual errors in the same post where he flatly states that the $230 million (up $30 million in just the last month!) to reconfigure Mercer Street will "Fix the Mercer Mess" is almost too rich.

Um, if by "fix" you mean actually substantially increase eastbound travel times and the number of congested intersections in SLU, yup, I guess you'll fix that, alrighty.

The current streetcar does indeed draw Metro transit hours away from buses, and there is no reason to believe that future extensions of the system wouldn't do the same thing (now, one can argue on some routes that this may be a reasonable trade off, but it is certainly hard to justify for a proposed SLUT extension to the U of W that is largely duplicative of excellent existing bus service and the coming light rail system).

While I suppose that people on a Vulcan salary may consider a one-bedroom apartment that rents at over $1250 per month "affordable", but nobody I know who actually rents in Seattle does.

Mr. Postman, you earned my respect over the years as a reporter. As a turd polisher for Paul Allen, not so much.

Posted Mon, Dec 22, 5:22 p.m. Inappropriate

Mr Kammerer clearly states what many of us are thinking.

I was, however, surprised and disappointed in the typical corporate-speak reaction to Kent's piece written by David Postman. I, at one time, admired Mr Postman's balanced political writing in the Seattle Times.

Let's hope Vulcan doesn't provide job security for all the soon-to-be unemployed news writers in this town. patricia stambor

Posted Tue, Dec 23, 2:56 p.m. Inappropriate

The streetcar means another cost to the other Seattle that the streetcar will never, ever, ever reach.
The street in front of my house does not have a painted line. The sidewalk does not extend beyond the 3 blocks it has covered since it was poured 58 years ago.
The tar/gravel "paving" has resulted in a road that has such a hump in the middle (where a painted line could me imagined) that it rises to a slightly higher elevation than the 58 year-old curb and sidewalk, causing anything lower than an SUV to scrape a fender backing out onto what Seattle calls a street.
Enough with Allentown already, the rest of us in the other Seattle would like to know when we will join this other Seattle with the pretty roads, sidewalks, and proposed streetcars.

Mr Baker

Posted Fri, Dec 26, 4:22 p.m. Inappropriate

I'd like to emphasize an early comment:

Thanks for saying what we've all been thinking.

Bartee

Login or register to add your voice to the conversation.

Join Crosscut now!
Subscribe to our Newsletter

Follow Us »