What's good for preservation is good for the greens

This year will be challenging for historic preservation in Seattle, but there are great opportunities and new initiatives ahead, too. Here's a breakdown of six front-burner issues for 2009. Second of 2 parts

The Pike Place Market has a well-established hold on the city's soul, but it's also a reminder of how easily it can slip away

The Pike Place Market has a well-established hold on the city's soul, but it's also a reminder of how easily it can slip away

Part 2

4. National Trust Green Lab

Perhaps the biggest deal happening in Seattle this year is the announced launching of a National Trust for Historic Preservation "Green Lab" here. The National Trust has grabbed onto the sustainability mantra and sees Seattle as an ideal place to link sustainability principles with historic preservation. Said National Trust president Richard Moe last spring:

As the keystone of this new Initiative, we'll establish the National Trust Green Lab in Seattle, the hub of the region that leads the nation in green thinking. This office will collaborate with selected cities to develop and implement zoning ordinances, building codes and other plans that support the reuse and retrofit of existing buildings.

Seattle is seen as green-friendly (thanks in part to Mayor Greg Nickels' PR efforts) and history-friendly, as our crusades in the 1960s and '70s to preserve Pioneer Square and the Pike Place Market have given us a national preservation profile. However, the Green Lab's director (see job posting) will also have to do missionary work here because many greens, including Seattle's, have been slow to pick up on the preservation-equals-sustainability message. As Moe has previously noted, "Still, too many people just don't see the connection. They don't yet understand that preservation must be an integral part of any effort to encourage environmental responsibility and sustainable development. They don't yet realize that our buildings are renewable – not disposable – resources."

As preservationist and architect Peter Steinbrueck has pointed out, the city could do a much better job coordinating its policies and straightening out development rules and regulations to help encourage adaptive re-use and saving older, though not necessarily landmark, structures. Seattle sends mixed signals with a healthy and proactive landmarks process on the one hand, yet the city also facilitates the destruction of older buildings in the name of being green. In other words, Seattle is ripe for reform.

Kevin Daniels, one of the principals of Nitze-Stagen, the group behind saving downtown's First United Methodist Church sanctuary and historic re-developments like Union Station and Starbucks Center, is excited because the Green Lab's national funding will give visibility to experiments and success stories undertaken here in the Pacific Northwest. The Trust hopes to have the office open in the next couple of months.

5. Saving the Pike Place Market, Again!!?

Fresh after its centennial and a "yes" vote for funds to repair and improve infrastructure, we're once again faced with a potential threat to Seattle's greatest urban gem.

The latest Pike Place Market alert is being sounded by Jeffrey Karl Ochsner, professor of architecture at the University of Washington and associate dean of the UW's College of Architecture and Urban Planning. He says that the compromise surface solution being touted as an alternative to the Alaskan Way Viaduct turns downtown's Western Avenue into a traffic-choked, three-lane, pedestrian-hostile northbound street that would destroy the Market as we know it. The plan would cut off truck access, parking, and the flow of foot traffic from the waterfront side of the Market. In a Seattle Times op/ed in late December, he wrote:

Should the state go forward with three lanes of heavy northbound traffic on Western Avenue, we must resist. We have come too far in the creation of a successful pedestrian environment in our downtown, and we have such an irreplaceable treasure in Pike Place Market, that we cannot allow the state to proceed with such a destructive plan.

Gov. Chris Gregoire has delayed a decision on which Viaduct option to endorse; meanwhile, there's some momentum for a bored tunnel under downtown. But the fact that this surface option is a finalist should serve as a reminder that the area where the Viaduct and seawall mess is focused runs through and adjacent to some of the city's most important, historic, and pedestrian-reliant parts, such as Pike Place, the central waterfront, the piers, Pioneer Square, First Avenue, and the converted warehouse district in the so-called West Edge. While any option will likely take a toll on existing structures (at the very least the current final options all assume the destruction of the historic Viaduct itself), it is important to keep an eye on the details of plans drawn up by traffic engineers for their potential ripple effects throughout downtown on street life and the broader cultural landscape.

6. Preserving the preservationists.

A significant issue is the budget proposal from Gov. Gregoire to eliminate the State Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation as a separate agency and merge it with Parks and Recreation Commission. Budget analysts say this will allow a few employee positions to be cut. Some grant programs managed by the agency would also be farmed out to the Washington State Historical Society. Preservation advocates are already lobbying against the plan.

The agency's independence is critical, they argue, since it regulates other agencies (including Parks and Rec). Gregoire is said to be happy with agency head Dr. Allyson Brooks and is friendly to preservation efforts (grant funding for saving old barns and historic country courthouses is proposed to stay at current levels, which pleases the Washington Trust for Historic Preservation, the Seattle-based, state-wide advocacy group). However, Washington Trust isn't convinced the merger with Parks would actually save money. They worry consolidation would be less efficient, less productive, and require more administrative overview.

That argument will be hashed out in the upcoming legislative session. Negotiations will take place under the gun of unprecedented budget cuts. Gregoire has predicted the over-all budget picture will likely be "ugly."

So, 2009 begins with a budget battle to preserve a preservation program. Let's hope the rest of the year isn't devoted to spending time fixing what isn't broken but rather to restoring things that need to be fixed, and saving things that deserve to be saved.

Part 1: Endangered landmarks, the upside of the recession, and Obama's role

About the Author

Knute Berger is Mossback, Crosscut's chief Northwest native. He also writes the monthly Grey Matters column for Seattle magazine and is a weekly Friday guest on Weekday on KUOW-FM (94.9). His newest book is Pugetopolis: A Mossback Takes On Growth Addicts, Weather Wimps, and the Myth of Seattle Nice, published by Sasquatch Books. In 2011, he was named Writer-in-Residence at the Space Needle and is author of Space Needle, The Spirit of Seattle (2012), the official 50th anniversary history of the tower. You can e-mail him at mossback@crosscut.com.

Like what you just read? Support high quality local journalism. Become a member of Crosscut today!

Comments:

Posted Thu, Jan 8, 10:55 a.m. Inappropriate

In 1975, I was appointed the first full-time professional State Historic Preservation Officer by then governor Dan Evans, a strong advocate of preservation and archaeology. The OAHP was then seated in State Parks. The Governor agreed with my request to remove the Office from Parks due to obvious conflicts of interest and because in my parallel, new role of State Conservator (not continued after I was fired by Governor Ray), I would be allowed to propose and create an additional Historic Preservation program parallel to the National Register, but dealing only with State agencies who, at that time, did not have any overview for historic preservation impacts.

Putting the OAHP back in Parks is reversing a positive and constructive program that will throw it back to 1974, the dark ages of State Preservation efforts.
It must NOT be allowed! Everyone who cares about Preservation and Archaeology in this State, should be on the phone RIGHT NOW to defeat this proposal.
To allow this idea to go thuough, is to see State and Local preservation programs become the target of other cost cutting porposals and diminishment of the programs including reduced funding for non-profits.

PICK UP THE PHONE!

Art Skolnik FAIA

State Historic Preservation Officer/State Conservator/ Chair: Governor's State Advisory Council on Historic Preservation
1975 - 1978

Posted Thu, Jan 8, 8:27 p.m. Inappropriate

Seattle and King County are lucky to have a writer of your stature who treats historic preservation with the seriousness it merits as a basic indicator of the quality of life in our community and not just the preoccupation of people with an overabundance of sentimentality and time on their hands.

Posted Thu, Jan 8, 8:40 p.m. Inappropriate

I wonder if a seventh challenge might be to get the other Seattle papers to treat historic preservation as a serious issue meriting sustained reporting and editorial attention. I am tired of seeing the Seattle Times lampoon important efforts to preserve mid-century modern architecture in Ballard and the historic fabric of downtown Seattle. Seattle's newspapers need to get beyond the tired assumption that economic development and historic preservation are necessarily opposed. Only when the economic and environmental benefits of historic preservation are acknowledged in the mainstream media will politicians take preservation seriously. Peter Steinbrueck's excellent piece earlier this year highlighted Ron Sims' misguided opposition to the historic restoration of the King County Courthouse. If the rest of the news media starts to take historic preservation seriously, politicians like Ron Sims will have to as well.

Posted Sat, Feb 14, 3:19 p.m. Inappropriate

A commenter spoke about Sally Clark saying last year that she thought we should focus on elements of preservation. I agree that she should. I heard her make a comment about historic - ish districts.

Historic preservation sets a high standard. And in a newer city like Seattle, many might say that a building that is only 25 years old is not historic.

But, what about the needs of us for the familiar street scape? Can we have the preservation of what is great quality architecture meet up with a reuse attitude and still provide for building up?

Ideas are abounding. Why not include incentives in the new multifamily code for preserving that old mansion? What are the criteria so the one story box does not qualify? What if we identify that block of one story shops on Madison, and particular buildings such as Catfish Corner and the Dilettante building as those where we want to preserve the facades at street level? What code changes will allow the development that is zoned for, but keep that historic character? I doubt mounting a historic preservation effort will succeed in any of these instances. Madrona Auto was a wonderful kitsch image of the past. It was a no go for preservation, based on the fact that it could not be rehabilitated.

I've lived in some older cities that have strong historic preservation aspects, but everything is not preserved because it goes all the way through the process of getting that medallion. But, community preservation and design standards have enough backup in the laws so that, where neighbors review new projects, they keep those elements that made their community what it was.

Posted Fri, Jul 3, 9:40 a.m. Inappropriate

I always look forwatrd to Knute Berger's insightful and often humorous editorials, but really love that he's writing about historic preservation AND sustainability - a concept familiar to the East Coast but, so far, out of grasp to the Northwest. I have high hopes for the NTHP's Preservation Green Lab and think developer Liz Dunn will do everything in her power to make it succeed. Can't wait to see the shift with preservation projects making headlines in the field of sustainability.

Login or register to add your voice to the conversation.

Join Crosscut now!
Subscribe to our Newsletter

Follow Us »