Is it okay for us to rejoin the nation?
After almost a decade of being out of step, the national and local world views are finally in sync.
Seattle has entered a new year, but also a new reality. Or an old reality. Or maybe just plain old reality. For most of this century’s first decade, we’ve been a city on the outside, an anomaly when it comes to national trends. We were greener and bluer than most of America, and have felt at odds with Washington, D.C., and its Karl Rove–based unreality. So much so that people began to refer to us as a lonely urban isle in a small, liberal archipelago. Even our mayor, Greg Nickels, found more common cause with foreign governments than his own as he urged everyone to get right with the Kyoto environmental accords. The isolation was so great that Nickels publicly daydreamed that Seattle ought to secede from Washington, perhaps America.
But it’s a new year, and we’re ushering in a new national administration — one that seems much more aligned with Seattle’s world view. The image that said it best was the cover of Seattle Weekly the day after the November 2008 election: a cartoon of the Uptight Seattleite columnist basking in the warm rays of Barack Obama’s ubiquitous sunny campaign logo. At last, even the city’s biggest PC nitpicker could take a day off.
Seattle entered the new year with optimism, despite a national economic crisis, two wars, and troubles on the home front for companies ranging from Boeing (a strike, problems delivering the new jet) to Starbucks (cutbacks and retrenching) to Washington Mutual Savings Bank (seized by the government and subject of the largest savings-bank collapse in U.S. history). Even Microsoft is laying folks off. The growth industry is easing, too: While the cranes still dot the downtown landscape for projects in the pipeline, the credit crisis has halted many planned developments.
Even so, Seattle remains committed to public spending. While people worried about their personal pocketbooks, they were willing to open them up for important improvements. In November, voters approved $18 billion for a new round of light rail expansion, $73 million to fix up the Pike Place Market, and almost $146 million for city parks, open space and community gardens. Despite national recession, Seattle is still willing to bankroll quality of life, though their own 401-ks and IRAs are shrinking.
Seattleites also joined state voters in re-electing Governor Christine Gregoire, who has sometimes been at odds with city leaders over major projects. She opposed Nickels’ original waterfront tunnel project, for example. And she will start her new term with a mandate to cut the state’s budget, which faces a gaping $6-billion-plus deficit. Yet Gregoire has also promised to jump-start two Seattle projects stuck in gridlock: the Alaskan Way Viaduct and the 520 bridge (a bridge to somewhere, that being Microsoft). The global financial crisis may be scary, but for many people the prospect of doing nothing about our local problems is unacceptable.
The new year finds Seattle in sync with national policy on rebuilding the economy with alternative energy, cleaner fuels and tax breaks for green innovations. For years, Representative Jay Inslee, who represents Seattle’s suburban arc from Bainbridge Island to Shoreline to Redmond, has pushed his New Apollo Project—a kind of New Frontier–style national, put-a-man-on-the-moon effort like John F. Kennedy’s—aimed at solving our energy and environmental crisis. With Democrats in control of Congress and Obama talking much the same talk, Seattle-inspired initiatives like Inslee’s could actually take off. Instead of ecotopian outposts marching to different drummers, the new year sees cities like Seattle, Portland and San Francisco nearer to the mainstream, no longer lefty outliers.
Another thing to look forward to: Obama has pledged to keep the American middle class at the forefront of economic recovery. Seattle once exemplified a kind of middle-brow egalitarianism. We’ve lost some of that during boom times as Seattle has become less affordable and the divide between rich and poor has widened. Refocused economic policies aimed at building the middle will help bolster what has long been the fabric of our city.
Seattle has spent eight years experiencing a kind of cognitive dissonance. Now there’s hope that in the next decade we’ll move ahead feeling a little saner, knowing that we share a common reality with the majority of America. The Uptight Seattleite can loosen up a little and enjoy the ride.
Note: A slightly different version of this column first appeared in the January issue of Seattle magazine.
Like what you just read? Support high quality local journalism. Become a member of Crosscut today!











Twitter
Facebook
RSS Feeds
Comments:
Posted Thu, Feb 12, 6:15 a.m. Inappropriate
Obama publicly stated that extraordinary renditions will continue under his administrations. He also announced that the NSA can continue with their FISA-ignoring wiretapping of Americans. I'm glad that Seattle is in-sync with the continued assault on our civil liberties. Let's not even talk about the lobbyists and insiders filling his cabinet. Finally, Obama is really a bad public speaker. His so-called “soaring rhetoric” is filled with awkward pauses and inflections. He can't even utter a simple sentence that doesn't sounds like he is back pontificating in the Senate.
Now that's change you can believe in!
Posted Thu, Feb 12, 9:02 a.m. Inappropriate
"Now there’s hope that in the next decade we’ll move ahead feeling a little saner, knowing that we share a common reality with the majority of America. "
Nope. The majority of Americans are neither as stupid nor as unkempt. When you start seeing multiple facial piercings in the suburbs of Omaha, then you should worry. Until then the city will just slob on spending what money remains to it on wind-powered flatulence generators.
Posted Thu, Feb 12, 9:16 a.m. Inappropriate
I've already sent for my "Who is John Galt?" bumper sticker. We survived Jimmy Carter. We should be able to survive this.
Posted Thu, Feb 12, 10:36 a.m. Inappropriate
I don't. I really hope Seattle crashes and burns and that all these greeniacs wake up in the rubble thinking, "I can't believe I forget to stock up on guns, canned goods, and ammo."
Posted Thu, Feb 12, 1:33 p.m. Inappropriate
Wow, who let these misfits writing the comments in? It's probably the same person, at least 2 of them are.
Posted Thu, Feb 12, 1:59 p.m. Inappropriate
I don't agree with Mayor Nichols on a lot of things, but when he took a leadership position on supporting the Kyoto Accords, and took his opinions to the National Conference of Mayors I was proud of him. He generated a lot of agreement, and exposed the glaring and irresponsible absence of leadership from the Bush administration.
So far Obama hasn't been perfect, and I'm not happy with several of his appointments, but the country is in a hangover mode from eight years of rule by Ivy League troglodytes.
Obama has said many times he wants to change the Washington "culture", but that will be no easy or simple task, it will involve many political risks he may not be anxious to take after only a few weeks in office.
Cheney/Bush reveled in the corruption of Washington culture and contributed to it without caring about any consequences for the country. Now corruption and conflict of interest are endemic to the system.
The stars are aligned for this country to undergo many positive changes and innovations in technology and infrastructure that many developed countries around the world are already well ahead of us on. After a period of about thirty years when the Republican Party gave us three presidents who were the first in American history to actively discourage and undermine innovation we are no longer in the same leadership position we were in before 1980.
The times they are a changin'. And the sooner the better.
Posted Thu, Feb 12, 3:46 p.m. Inappropriate
It's amazing how the liberals (like DavidT) stopped worrying about NSA spying on Americans as soon as a Demolib was doing the spying. Even the ACLU is silent on the issue. More proof that left-liberals are instinctive totalitarians. They don't mind an oppressive government apparatus as long as the boot on our necks belongs to a liberal Democrat.
Posted Thu, Feb 12, 3:57 p.m. Inappropriate
There could be no better investment in America than to invest in America becoming energy independent! We need to utilize everything in out power to reduce our dependence on foreign oil including using our own natural resources. Create cheap clean energy, new badly needed green jobs, and reduce our dependence on foreign oil. The high cost of fuel this past year seriously damaged our economy and society. The cost of fuel effects every facet of consumer goods from production to shipping costs. After a brief reprieve gas is inching back up. OPEC will continue to cut production until they achieve their desired 80-100. per barrel. If all gasoline cars, trucks, and SUV's instead had plug-in electric drive trains, the amount of electricity needed to replace gasoline is about equal to the estimated wind energy potential of the state of North Dakota. There is a really good new book out by Jeff Wilson called The Manhattan Project of 2009 Energy Independence Now.
Posted Thu, Feb 12, 4:45 p.m. Inappropriate
No country is energy independent. Not even Saudi Arabia. You're chasing a mirage. When a plug-in electric vehicle can go 200 miles, not 40 miles, it might make sense. In the meantime, each of these primitive electric vehicles and hybrids does more damage to the environment, from extracting the raw materials to disposal of the scrap, than a Chevrolet Suburban. Here's a tip: Don't be heavily invested in green technology companies when that bubble bursts. I give it five years - seven, tops. Sorry to be the bearer of Inconvenient Truths.
Posted Thu, Feb 12, 8:11 p.m. Inappropriate
"There could be no better investment in America than to invest in America becoming energy independent! We need to utilize everything in out power to reduce our dependence on foreign oil including using our own natural resources."
Obama calls Alaska gas pipeline promising
ENERGY RESOURCE: President plans to discuss it with Canadians.
http://www.adn.com/money/industries/oil/pipeline/story/687588.html
Posted Fri, Feb 13, 7:08 a.m. Inappropriate
dbreneman,
You are 100% correct. Of course, the Al Gore fans who are emotionally invested in green technology as a means to assuage their liberal guilt stubbornly refuse to pull their heads out of the sand. Eventually, however, realty will bite them in the arse.
Posted Fri, Feb 13, 8:31 a.m. Inappropriate
Oh, please, Crosscut editors, consider moderating the comments. I love the interplay of differing opinions and responses, but the contemptuous name-calling is so boring and rude, it's no fun. Commenters: would you please try to make your point without dragging in a stereotype to support it?
About the article--I'm hopeful about this national political realignment in the way that someone on a shipwreck might be hopeful about a sail in the distance. Which means, I know it might be a pirate but am still going to be standing right here on the sinking deck cheering for that sail with all my energy because hope seems saner to me right now, more constructive and useful, than the alternative. And I also see reason to hope. Of course we all need freedom to watchdog Obama's policies, and there are ugly political realities and big disappointments in store--as there always are with any human administration--but what's the point in being bitter, devaluing, or overly cynical about him or his administration? Or in denying what's good?
Posted Fri, Feb 13, 11:49 a.m. Inappropriate
I see Berger's finally given into the latest brand of revivalism. Unfortunately, this is not the confirmation of cosmopolitan liberalism, but the faltering of American Exceptionalism and the accompanying liberal project. Recent claims to ascendancy pivot solely on the denunciation of liberal brethren as heretics; brethren that have carried the torch of liberalism as outcasts. Namely, those disaffected, and subsequently militarized liberals born out of the schism on the 60's: the neo-conservatives and their neo-liberal project. That they did so under the cloak of Protestant revivalism, rather than the current revival of Scientism, is the primary source of tension between the two strains of Liberalism. Make no mistake, Obama pursues the same ends as Bush: securing the material trappings of American-style freedom and liberty to the exclusion of most the worlds inhabitants and future generations. Obama's embrace of Carter's rejected vision only testifies to the diminished nature of American Exceptionalism--a vision that increases mechanization at the expense of the natural world.
Posted Sat, Feb 14, 4:20 p.m. Inappropriate
'We’ve lost some of that during boom times as Seattle has become less affordable and the divide between rich and poor has widened.'
Were we out of step with the rest of the country? You bet. Since the mid-nineties Seattle has gotten more and more overdue for a bit of deflation. When you see people you know who grew up here and work two jobs end up homeless, something is really wrong with how we measure success.
I've seen cities where the wealthy leaders actually perform for the benefit of the city, because they have values that are not about things like Paul Allen's urban removal scheme or creation of Seattle as the bedroom community for Microsoft hipsters, all in the name of creating a 'world class city'. Let's focus on being world class for the people who actually live and work here.
Maybe the politics will actually meet right-side-up economics and folks will take a deep breath and prioritize the right stuff.
Login or register to add your voice to the conversation.