Our Sponsors:

Read more »

Our Members

Many thanks to Wesley McCullough and Robert Bolerjack some of our many supporters.

ALL MEMBERS »

Mainline churches face identity crises

The stunning resignation of the new minister at Riverside Church underscores problems with some leading Seattle churches. In confronting congregations with muddled identities and generational tensions, new ministers stand on shaky ground.
The Riverside Church in New York City has often been associated with progressive social movements.

The Riverside Church in New York City has often been associated with progressive social movements. Riverside Church

Just two months after being installed as the new Senior Minister of the historic Riverside Church in New York City, Rev. Brad Braxton has resigned, stunning the congregation and the wider world of mainline Protestantism.

Riverside Church, a multi-racial, multi-cultural congregation of 2,700 members, is viewed by many as the tallest of the tall steeple churches of the liberal church. The imposing gothic structure of Riverside on Manhattan’s upper west side was created by a gift of John D. Rockefeller in 1930 to provide a pulpit for the leading liberal preacher of the day, Harry Emerson Fosdick.

Braxton, an African-American and a Baptist with a PhD in New Testament, had begun his pastorate last fall, his official installation not coming until this spring. His installation had been contested by a group of Riverside members who even petitioned a New York judge to stop it. The courts denied that petition, telling church members to work out their problems (imagine that!). But the problems weren’t worked out. Instead, they overwhelmed the new pastor.

Riverside Church is not the only congregation of liberal or mainline Protestantism to experience such difficulties. Here in Seattle a number of “tall steeple” churches have experienced relatively brief pastorates that have ended unhappily. St. Mark’s Cathedral, Seattle First Baptist, Plymouth Congregational (UCC), and Mt. Zion Baptist are among such congregations locally. (By way of disclosure: I was the Senior Minister of Plymouth from 1990 to 2004.)

What’s going on? What happened at Riverside? What’s happened in this group of important and historic congregations in Seattle? Are there common themes? Each congregation is unique, and yet some generalizations may be made.

Riverside had experienced internal conflict under the previous pastorate of the Rev. James Forbes. During Forbes' tenure (1990–2007) Riverside changed from a predominately Caucasian to a majority African-American congregation. Among the many simmering issues is the question of the congregation’s identity. Will it be in the mold of other large African-American congregations with a worship style that reflects the tradition of the black church? Or will it be, as it has been, a more establishment if social-activist congregation, not unlike many churches in the liberal Protestant tradition?

There’s an irony here. For a couple decades now many mainline Protestant and liberal congregations have placed great emphasis on themes of “diversity,” “inclusion,” and “welcome.” When that invitation is heeded, a congregation may find itself with some unexpected challenges. Those who enter the open doors may not be like those who are already there. Some may be gay or lesbian. Others may be people of color. Some may be of different theological traditions. Others may be people whose notion of what worship looks like or should be may be very different than prevailing norms.

When this happens, questions of identity and purpose loom large. Often there is little clear agreement about such crucial matters, nor a clear way to attain agreement. At Riverside key questions appear to be, “Who are we?” and “Where are we going?” Something similar may be true of some of the Seattle congregations that have struggled in recent years. Diversity is a gift, but without a basis of unity amid diversity fragmentation ensues.

Another dimension of the diversity that many congregations of the historic mainline face is generational diversity. These churches typically have builders, boomers, and Gen Xers—all in the same congregation. Usually there are more builders and older boomers than others, but still there’s a mix. This is different than many mega and emerging churches: The mega churches tend to be peopled by boomers, while the emerging churches appeal to Gen X.

Generational differences aren’t new, but they may be more pronounced than once was the case. Different generations like, and expect, different music. They may have very different life experiences and, as a result, different needs. And they have different styles. Where some are formal, others are informal. Some like their church services unchanging and precisely one hour in length, while others covet spontaneity and variety.


Like what you just read? Support high quality local journalism. Become a member of Crosscut today!

Comments:

Posted Thu, Jul 9, 3:30 p.m. Inappropriate

While it is fairly popular amongst the punditocracy and sociological priesthood to lament the waning relevance of mainline denominations, I would venture to guess that the issues at Riverside reflect inner political and personality tensions rather than a symptom of a trend. Diversity is, indeed, a reality and challenge for all religious institutions at this generational crossroads, but it is also an opportunity. Many mainline communities are inspired to embrace an entrepreneurial approach to marketing and membership. Others provide a multiplicity of programs, services and sites to access. Emerging, charismatic and evangelical communities provide a hook for a certain demographic. But it is the mainline institutions, particularly the healthiest and the most self-aware, that remain the pillars of faith, tradition and community.

radbam

Posted Sun, Jul 12, 10:30 a.m. Inappropriate

An interesting example of institutional strain in the face of a fascinating, and undeniable, trend: segmentation of interest groups based on cultural, racial, and political diversity.

I can understand why some, like radbam, may wish to deny that it is a trend, but it's happening nonetheless. Read Bill Bishop's recent report on demographic (and interest group) change, "The Big Sort," Cass Sunstein's "Going to Extremes," or other recent examples of what the "punditocracy and sociological priesthood" are gleaning from these trends.

The Riverside case, interestingly, resembles a corporate shareholder-board-management struggle in which organizational mission, CEO compensation, and similar issues are under review.

This kind of 'fractioning' happens naturally to mature organizations whose homogeneity dissolves (check History of the Catholic Church); as mentioned, newly-formed "megachurches" have the (temporary) advantage of being formed by people who self-select into a community that's pretty well-defined. Note our local Mars Hill phenomenon, and the enormous assemblages of quite like-minded people in other such institutions around the country....

Seneca

Posted Wed, Jul 15, 12:44 p.m. Inappropriate

Can't help but add a note following today's announcement of the Episcopalean schism. It's denomination-wide, rather than a single-congregation issue, but is another sign of strain in formerly homogeneous institutions...

Seneca

Login or register to add your voice to the conversation.

Join Crosscut now!
Subscribe to our Newsletter

Follow Us »