Best local campaign award goes to the Mariners

Memo to Joe Mallahan and other local politicians: Be like the Ms and do something positive in the face of past incompetence

Mayoral candidate Joe Mallahan

Mallahan campaign

Mayoral candidate Joe Mallahan

Here's my mid-summer working list of goods and bads. I find myself rooting for Seattle mayoral candidate Joe Mallahan, County Executive candidates Ross Hunter and Fred Jarrett, Mariners general manager Jack Zduriencik and manager Don Wakamatsu, Jenny Sanford (wife of philandering South Carolina Gov. Mark Sanford), and Congressional Democrats and Republicans making good-faith efforts to sustain economic recovery and also arrive at practical health-care and energy plans.

I already have heard and seen enough about Mayor Greg Nickels and City Council member Jan Drago, incumbent County Council members seeking to become County Executive, Sarah Palin, the Boeing Dreamliner and Boeing's continuing attempts to extort local taxpayers and workers, Sound Transit light rail, Seafair, Gov. Mark Sanford (husband of Jenny Sanford), Al Sharpton, Daddy Joe Jackson, and others seeking to enrich and promote themselves in the aftermath of Michael Jackson's death. Media coverage of Jackson's death, and aftermath, has been over the top. Yes, enough.

One thread runs through these goods and bads. The "goods" all involve people trying to do something positive in the face of uphill odds. The "bads" mainly involve people and institutions either useless or with track records of self service and of wasting our time and money.

At local level, I am concerned that Joe Mallahan, though having a financial advantage (his own wallet) over other mayoral challengers to Nickels in next month's primary, has not waged the well-managed campaign I would have expected. Voters clearly want a positive change from Nickels, and Drago is Nickels in drag. Mallahan, however, has not stepped smartly into the breech and established himself in voters' minds as the hard nosed, businesslike, managerial type — with actual knowledge of economics and budgets — badly needed after eight careless tax-and-spend years of city governance. I have been surprised by Mallahan's seeming lack of knowledge of city issues that have been on the front burner for several years. With his funding advantages, I had anticipated that by now he would be running in the front of the Nickels-challenging pack. He has a month left to get there.

I am equally concerned that state Rep. Ross Hunter and state Sen. Fred Jarrett will split the reform vote in the County Executive race and allow another Democratic challenger to emerge as the alternative to political tyro Susan Hutchison in the fall general election. Hunter, as Mallahan, has his own money to spend that other candidates do not. Also, as Mallahan, he will need to spend it wisely in the month ahead if he wants to reach the November finals.

At national level, President Obama's domestic agenda is at a balance point. On the positive side, he has helped mobilize public opinion around the notion that health-care and energy reforms cannot be postponed. But he has left drafting of health and energy plans too largely to a Democratic Congress which, as expected, has loaded them with expensive provisions devised to attract votes from key committee members and constituencies. Time is running short for passable, bipartisan bills to find success in the House and Senate. A couple weeks back I gave pared-back versions of those plans a 60-40 chance of passage by the August Congressional recess. I now make that 55-45.

Looming in the background is the fact that economic revival has been slower, and the economic downturn deeper, than Obama promised when he urged passage of his stimulus plan shortly after his inauguration. Congressional Democrats, among others, are now complaining that the $787-billion plan's impacts have been too slow. They should have known it, since House Democrats were the principal authors of the plan. Its spending always was expected to be felt more in 2010 than in 2009. Tax cuts, with more immediate impact, accounted for only a third of the plan. Only $60 billion of the remaining $500 billion has been committed and only a small percentage of that sum is actually in the spending pipeline.

The projected deficit for the fiscal year is now $1.8 trillion. Obama thus far has refused bipartisan calls for a second stimulus package. He is defending the present one while, at the same time, pressing health and energy plans which themselves will add to federal deficits over the next decade.

Obama and senior House and Senate leaders are trying to reconstruct the health and energy legislation so as to make it less expensive. But, as they do so, they are having to entertain cutbacks in health coverage and/or new taxes, both of which are unpopular with legislators facing reelection in 2010. The longer the health/energy agendas lag, the greater their chances of abandonment. Events of the next fortnight will tell the tale.

Special recognition should go to Jenny Sanford, wife of South Carolina Gov. Mark Sanford, who disclosed he was philandering (sometimes at state expense) while at the same time serving as a poster boy for Moral Majority types and pondering a 2012 Presidential candidacy. Rather than take the normal stand-by-my-man posture, smiling painfully during Sanford's over-revelatory press conference, Mrs. Sanford did not bother to show up there and made it known she was concerned with her marriage and children and not with his ambitions. She wasn't entirely sure, she made it known, that she even wanted to hang around. South Carolina voters, to their credit, have cottoned to her more than to their governor, whose political career appears properly near an end.

Finally, I am on my feet cheering for Zduriencik and Wakamatsu, who have kept the Mariners in a pennant race with a bailing-wire lineup and weak hitting. They have preached fundamentals, dumped malingerers from the roster, and not sacrificed young talent in a now-or-never attempt to make a short-term run. Zduriencik has proceeded wisely in leaving the team well positioned to either acquire or trade talent before the July 31 trading deadline. He has some blue and red chips still on the table if, between now and then, the Mariners drop out of contention and he wants to use those chips to bring in young talent for 2010 and 2011. On the other hand, if the team still is contending July 31, he can use a chip or two to add immediate hitting help without crippling the future.

Good guys doing a good job where, in the past, we have grown accustomed to fumbling incompetence.


About the Author

Ted Van Dyk has been involved in, and written about, national policy and politics since 1961. His memoir of public life, Heroes, Hacks and Fools, was published by University of Washington Press. You can reach him in care of editor@crosscut.com.

Like what you just read? Support high quality local journalism. Become a member of Crosscut today!

Comments:

Posted Mon, Jul 13, 9:38 a.m. Inappropriate

Ted, Mallahan can't use all of his money (most of which comes from outside of Seattle, except for the $200,000 he donated to himself) on policy expertise, years of experience working on the issues that really matter or hundreds of dedicated volunteers - all things that Michael Mcginn already has as he continues to emerge as the real challenger to Mayor Nickels. Why are you surprised at Mallahan's lack of knowledge of City issues? He hasn't been involved with them at all, ever.

Posted Mon, Jul 13, 12:44 p.m. Inappropriate

benjamincm: Thanks for your comment. Candidates should be appropriate to the needs of the times. I would greatly prefer McGinn as mayor over either Nickels or Drago. But both Seattle and King County presently suffer from overbloated, overpaid bureacracies...inadequate management of hugely expensive public projects...and incumbent leadership more responsive to single- and special-interest constituencies than to the overall public good.

In Seattle, I prefer Mallahan because his temperament and experience
would enable him to more objectively weigh policy options, to bring rationality to their consideration, and then to run a city administration
being given inadequate oversight both by the present mayor and council.
McGinn, I fear, too greatly resembles many present Council members---well meaning and tied to cause agendas but unequipped to take charge in tough times.

My instinct tells me that Nickels will make the November election ballot but that his opponent then, whomever it is, will have a strong chance to win.

Posted Tue, Jul 21, 11:49 p.m. Inappropriate

I am a bit concerned that anyone read this article who didn't feel compelled to write a comment against it.
It seems terribly uniformed about what is needed from the mayor's office in Seattle. You seem to think that you need a project manager to run it. The Mayor's office represents the vision of the city and its citizens. There are countless of other people to run the city but the vision comes from the top. If you think Seattle isn't at a turning point and identity crisis waiting to happen and needs to define its future, you're really out of touch. We cannot elect a candidate who as no policy positions and just says he wants to clean house. The crisis is about our landscape, town houses going crazy, traffic through the roof, density, global business competitiveness, aging infrastructure, and youth crime. If you think a project manager can come in and be mayor, we'll end up with all the single family homes clear-cutted into ugly town houses with fences around them, our neighborhoods being unwalkable, and a bottleneck of Everett commuters at the Mercer Exit, sitting idle while we suck down nauseous co2.
You're thoughts wondering how much Mallahan knows about the city in general call into question if he could even be a good project manager while so uninformed. You wrote it yourself, “I have been surprised by Mallahan's seeming lack of knowledge of city issues that have been on the front burner for several years.”
We have no great example of his voting record. He makes absolutely no policy statements of substance, other than he likes the environment, accountability, and is pro the economy. Not only is he failing to stick is neck out there about how he is any different from other candidates he fails to deliver anything constructive for the voters to chew on.
Aside from him writing his own check for 200,000 we wouldn't otherwise talk his candidacy, there is nothing to talk about except the lack of stuff to talk about. He's done nothing for Seattle, we don't know how he would vote on issues nor what he would plan to do as mayor other than make sure sand was sweeped out of bike lanes.
He has done a few stunts to pull in the press and get coverage, like calling for the SDOT head to resign. This from the guy who completely out of the loop on Seattle politics. It doesn't appear he's ever worked on change in city governance--I am not even sure he has spoken to a city council member before this race--he has made no political contributions in Seattle before, except the shocking 200,000 to his own campaign--now that is the kind of ego we criticize the current mayor about, times 200,000! Move over Nickels there is a bigger head in the room. Joe Mallahan for mayor, a first shot, never thought about city policy before wizkid, he’s a VP at a cell phone company.
Other than sitting in a cushy office in Bellevue, what has Mallahn done? When asked questions about housing codes, city departments, he doesn't give a blank stare he glosses over some bullet points about how he likes bringing diverse groups of people together. Your endorsement seems wild.
I am insulted he is even running. Seattle is one of the most beautiful cities in the world and we don't need some say nothing, know nothing, operations guy from a phone company that drops calls like crazy.

Come on Cross Cut. Do better!

Login or register to add your voice to the conversation.

Join Crosscut now!
Subscribe to our Newsletter

Follow Us »