Keeping King County's tiny Navy afloat
Is seemed like a good idea back when there was money sloshing around, but now the county's promises for foot ferries are proving hard to honor.
It's anticlimactic, but it's official: King County starts operating the Vashon Island-to-downtown- Seattle foot ferry today (Sept. 28). As a Vashon resident, I take some interest in these seemingly purely bureaucratic matters. But since the whole issue has gotten into the King County Executive's race, lots more folks are paying attention as well.
King County has paid the state to operate the Vashon foot ferry since last year. Next year, the county will start operating the West Seattle water taxi service that it has contracted out to Argosy Cruises since 1997. The West Seattle service is currently seasonal, and this year it will only run into October. In 2010, it will run year-round. The Vashon service has been re-branded as part of the King County Water Taxi.
King County started wading into these unfamiliar transportation waters two years ago. The year before, 2006, the Washington legislature passed a law that enabled counties to create ferry districts. Ferry funding had depended heavily on the car tab fees that were slashed after voters passed Initiative 695 in 2001. The state supreme court ruled the initiative unconstitutional, but the legislature quickly enacted the law that voters had tried to pass. Without a share of the car-tab fees, the state's ferry system, including the expensive passenger-only boats, had no dedicated source of funding. The state subsequently dropped passenger-only service to Bainbridge Island and Bremerton.
The legislature decided to fund the Vashon passenger ferry to 2008, after which the service would keep going only if a county ferry district took it over: If King County wanted a passenger-only boat to Vashon, King County could damn well pay for it. The legislation allowed the county to raise a whopping 75 cents per thousand from all property owners in the new special taxing district.
In April 2007, the King County Council voted to create a countywide ferry district. Seven months later, sitting as the ferry district board of directors, the council voted to impose a property tax of 5.5 cents per $1000 for a ten-year program that would involve taking over the Vashon and West Seattle runs and developing at least five experimental routes on Lake Washington and Puget Sound.
During the recent primary campaign for King County Executive, County Council members Kathy Lambert and Larry Phillips — who was a primary candidate — complained that in 2007, Council chair Dow Constantine — who was, of course, a more successful primary candidate — had made it clear that if they didn't vote money for a King County ferry district to benefit Constantine's constituents on Vashon Island and West Seattle, he wouldn't vote money — 10 cents per thousand — for a flood control district to benefit other people's constituents in the flood plains. Constantine said he had never done any such thing. Two other council members claimed he had. Both measures passed by overwhelming 8-1 votes, so Constantine's approval was hardly critical. And anyway, who cares? Trading votes is hardly a novel or reprehensible tactic.
There is, of course, a perfect symmetry in the two measures, which seemed well understood at the time. Both require people who live in some parts of the county to pay substantial taxes to solve problems unique to those who live elsewhere. No one told all those Vashon residents to go live on an island. But then, no one told all those Kent and Auburn residents to go build in a flood plain. Everyone in the county is taxed to support something that only a specific fragment of the population needs. Is this a new concept? “Did you ever look at how the Constitution was created?” asks the ferry district's executive director, Kjris Lund (who also directs the flood control district). “People like Thomas Jefferson and John Adams were always trading votes."
When the County takes over the Vashon run, a leased catamaran, the Melissa Ann, which formerly carried passengers in Hawaii, will replace the current sub-Spartan single-hulled Vashon passenger boat, which formerly carried oil-rig workers in the Gulf of Mexico. The Melissa Ann promises more stability, higher speed, and better fuel economy, as well as a less unpleasant ambience. The ferry district plans to lease another boat, which may or may not turn out to be a catamaran, for the West Seattle run. The county solicited proposals for both runs, and it is now deciding what kind of boat it wants for West Seattle. Paulette Norman, acting director of the county's marine division, explains that because the two routes are so different, the same kind of boat may not be appropriate for both.
The original grand scheme called for the county to eventually own a fleet of nine interchangeable 149-passenger catamarans. (The capacity wasn't picked arbitrarily: Bump it up one passenger, and the Coast Guard requires an extra crew member. The Melissa Ann is either 149-passenger or 150. Who knows? Lund says both figures have been used; you'd have to ask the Coast Guard.) That big fleet won't happen any time soon. And even if the county eventually owns nine boats, the interchangeable fleet probably won't happen at all. Lund explains that people have started re-thinking the original scheme, in part because on Lake Washington, which is “kind of like a bathtub,” one might want vessels that leave smaller wakes.
The county still expects to own at least a three-boat fleet, and it plans to have its own boats built and running in 2012. If all goes according to plan, the leases for the Vashon and West Seattle boats will expire at the end of 2011. The current capital budget includes a boat for Vashon, a boat for West Seattle, and a spare. The federal government has so far provided $3.1 million in grants for the vessels, and $2 million specifically to develop a cutting-edge hybrid vessel, which Norman says would probably be used on the shorter West Seattle route.
The county is hiring captains and crew to operate the Melissa Ann. It is also hiring someone who knows how to fix her. For major repairs, it will contract with local shipyards. It will contract with Washington State Ferries for access to state docks.
The new boat will carry 100 fewer passengers than the old, but the county will increase Vashon service from two peak-hour runs in each direction to three. It will also raise fares, albeit not much. A round trip will cost $9.
The ambitious — some would say quixotic — plan for a new mosquito fleet with those five new runs still exists on paper, but in the real world, it has been put on indefinite hold. “It's definitely . . 'suspended',” Lund says. Is this the end of the line? Maybe not. That may depend on what the region does about the 520 bridge. Ferry service on the lake “may be an idea whose idea comes again when that bridge is out of commission,” Lund says.
This year's legislature reduced the amount of countywide property tax the ferry district can collect from the ridiculously high 75 cents per thousand to a more-than-adequate 7.5. Ferry district backers would have preferred to raise money through a $20 fee on automobile license tabs, Dow Constantine's chief of staff, Chris Arkills, says. That funding mechanism was in the bill that both houses passed, but the governor vetoed it. Even jacking the property tax is less controversial — in other words, less likely to inspire an initiative campaign — than raising the license tab fee.
Like what you just read? Support high quality local journalism. Become a member of Crosscut today!










Twitter
Facebook
RSS Feeds
Comments:
Posted Mon, Sep 28, 7:18 a.m. Inappropriate
Nice to see a Vashon resident and Dow supporter see's nothing wrong with extorting votes for a foot ferry by coupling it to a life and public safety issue like the flood district.
Lund sounds like a piece of work too, vote trading? really? Maybe Lund was just happy to have more turf by having another project to direct. Another reason to reform King County, vote no to Constantine and let Chasan take the regular ferry.
Posted Tue, Sep 29, 10:53 a.m. Inappropriate
"Vote Trading" goes like this. "Good Idea Dow, i'll be happy to support your issue, would you be willing to vote for mine?"
Blackmail goes like this. "Rural councilmember, if you don't support this moronic idea of mine I am going to punish your district by withholding funding for flood control".
Every council member but one said the later was the tactic. Knowing how Dow does politics it isn't a surprise to see him do that. On top of that Council Member Lambert has the highest standards of integrity. If she said this happened you can take it to the bank.
This was a bad idea and gave us great insight into how Dow operates.
1) While a case could be made for the Puget Sound water Taxi there was no rational case for spending $88 million in county taxpayer money to run water taxi's on Lake Washington. Using Dow's own numbers it would cost less to buy every projected passenger their own boat then to run this mess.
2) It also was a trip to nowhere. Who would want to ride a boat from Kenmore or Renton halfway up the lake just to be forced onto a bus? Why wouldn't you just take a bus to start with?
3) It was nothing more than funneling public money into the pockets of Dow supporters.
4) The council members representing the districts it ran to didn't see a need for it so Dow had to blackmail them to get support. The 8-1 Vote wasn't the point, a 5-4 vote without a single council member representing the communities where the taxi would travel to would have sent a very bad message and made Dow a target. Now his lying about it is making him the target.
5) Instead of raising taxes $88 million for this fiasco there were proposals to put DMU Commuter rail from Renton to Woodinville (and on to Snohomish) on the BNSF line. At a cost of $75 million this could have been up and running in 18 months and given us very real congestion relief NOW, not decades down the road.
This is not the kind of "leadership" we need. The "my way or the highway" Sims Regime needs to be gone. Dow ran point on the council for Sims, why would we want to keep going down that road to failure?
Posted Thu, Oct 1, 8:24 p.m. Inappropriate
I agree with these writers. I live on Vashon but I don't use the passenger only ferries. Why should I pay for those people's transportation. For that matter, why should my taxes go for the Lake Washington bridges. Those people knew what is was like when they moved there. Same thing with the Alaskan Way corridor. I don't use those transportation facilities. Why should my taxes help pay for them. We could carry this out further. I don't have kids in school. Why should I pay taxes to support them. I don't play golf or use the County athletic fields either. We could really cut my taxes.
Posted Thu, Oct 1, 9:55 p.m. Inappropriate
You are absolutely right Dave 1942, you don't ride the passenger only ferries, you shouldn't pay, heck they shouldn't exist. How did you get around before the Passenger only ferries? Rubber raft?
If you don't have reason to leave the island or have any good and services delivered to you on via the roadway system to the island, more power to you. You will be happy to know that the current Democratic administration and council chaired by Mr. Constantine will be closing parks and athletic fields you detest so much. I bet you can hardly wait until they close your senior center too. In the budget according to Dow (via Triplett) they will be cutting your Sheriff services as well. Sarcasim it's whats for dinner.
Login or register to add your voice to the conversation.