The pinch of reality is producing a new kind of leadership

King County Executive Kurt Triplett, not worrying about getting elected, is "giving the work back" by telling hard truths. Ouch! We needed that.

Kurt Triplett, King County Executive (for two more months)

King County

Kurt Triplett, King County Executive (for two more months)

King County Executive Kurt Triplett is turning up the heat. By telling it straight, that the county cannot possibly fund all the services and programs that it has with the current tax mechanisms and funding formulas, Triplett is “giving the work back.” He is giving it back to the council, to the legislature, and to the voters. Will they (and we) rise to the challenge?

Leadership guru Ron Heifetz (Leadership Without Easy Answers, Leadership on the Line) of Harvard’s Kennedy School of Government tells leaders that without heat or the “pinch of reality” nothing much will happen. Heifetz argues the task of leaders is to “manage the heat,” ensuring that there is enough discomfort so that people will face their own most pressing and important challenges, but not so much heat that they will shut down and not do anything. “It’s like a pressure cooker,” says Heifetz, “too little heat, nothing cooks; too much, you blow the lid off.”

Is Kurt Triplett giving us a textbook study in “turning up the heat?” In recent weeks, Triplett has been talking about the various programs and services provided by the county that are beyond its required legal mandate. Case in point: animal control services. The county got into the animal control business back in 1972. Triplett says it's time to get out. Cities will have to shoulder animal control themselves or contract it out to not-for-profits.

This week Triplett issued his proposed budget for 2010. It would, among other things, “mothball” 39 parks, cut 367 country positions (many currently unfilled), increase bus fares, continue this year’s program of county worker furloughs, and reduce human services in as yet unspecified ways. The sparring quickly began. Triplett said his budget shielded mandated police and public safety, but King County Sheriff Sue Rahr begs to disagree. Rahr argues that the proposed budget fails to shield public safety from significant cuts and will put county citizens at risk by cutting police personnel.

From the “turn up the heat” perspective Rohr’s protest may be all to the good. Triplett’s idea seems to be to prompt the citizens of the county, as well as the state legislature, to confront the inadequate funding basis of counties throughout the state. “There’s nothing left to spare,” said Triplett. “Counties have to be funded differently.” Instead of telling people he’s got it under control or that he has a magic, pain-free fix, Triplett is saying, “We have a problem. Are we going to face it?” Kind of refreshing.

For some time now, voters have been happy to ask for additional services and then put lids on property taxes, the principal funding base for the counties. Now the chickens are coming home to roost. Rather than protecting people from this reality, Triplett is taking a page from Heifetz’s leadership play book and “letting people feel the pinch of reality.”

Two people who are happy that Triplett is turning up the heat (rather than their doing it) are the two people running for King County Executive, Dow Constantine and Susan Hutchison. It is great when your predecessor makes some of the tough calls and pulls the plug on programs — so you don’t have to. However, if Triplett’s larger agenda succeeds and people do face up to the question of how countries and in particular King County is funded, it will be either Constantine or Hutchison who will have to carry that ball forward and keep the heat on. Do either of them have the stomach for that?

They’d better, as the 2009 general-fund deficit of $93 million is projected to be another $54 million in 2011 and then $88 million in 2012, provided there is no change in funding and no new sources of revenue.

Do we have to have people who are in Kurt Triplett’s odd interim position (no legacy to defend as was the case for longtime Country Exec Ron Sims) or no election to win (Constantine and Hutchinson) who have the courage to tell us these hard truths? While Mayor Greg Nickels isn’t quite the same species of lame duck as Triplett, he surely is a type of that ornithological type. Might we hope that Nickels will take advantage of his waning days to do some Triplett-style turning up the heat?


About the Author

Anthony B. (Tony) Robinson is President of Seattle-based Congregational Leadership Northwest. He speaks and writes, nationally and internationally, on religious life and leadership. He is the author of 10 books. Crosscut readers may particularly enjoy Common Grace (Sasquatch Books). His blog, "What's Tony Thinking?", is at his website, www.anthonybrobinson.com.

Like what you just read? Support high quality local journalism. Become a member of Crosscut today!

Comments:

Posted Thu, Oct 1, 7:17 a.m. Inappropriate

Thanks for pointing out that Lord Mayor Greg Nickels isn’t quite the same species of lame duck as Triplett. I checked him out using binoculars and based on various field marks (agressively up-tilted chin, enormously bloated ego) and his call, which sounds like "I'm green--I'm green," definitively identified him as a dodo.

On a more serious note, Triplett's intelligence and willingness to tell hard truths are refreshing.

Mud Baby

Posted Thu, Oct 1, 9:14 a.m. Inappropriate

Perhaps Mr. Robinson will have the courage to tell those in the social service ranks that the 'business' folks they've been 'cooperating' with are just corporate welfare cheats and that the only way we are going to be able to afford social services is to cut out their subsidies?

Posted Thu, Oct 1, 9:51 a.m. Inappropriate

I agree with the need to better fund county governments, but the example of property taxes is a poor one in the context of King County.

10% of county residents are rural, but they make up over 50% of unincorporated property tax revenue. County services are concentrated where they are needed and most efficient - urban areas. Throw in some angst around environmental initiatives that target rural, but not urban landowners and you have a recipe for revolt.

Maybe there should be a special tax or living outside growth boundary lines, but if that's the case we should call it what it is. Instead we have a dysfunctional system of funding our services that aligns more to political power than fairness.

Arie_v

Posted Thu, Oct 1, 9:56 a.m. Inappropriate

The tact of going to the taxpayers and saying, "look at all this stuff we have to do! We need more money!" is failing. The discussion needs to go the other way, upward, if you will: Counties should tell the state who should tell the Feds: We cannot afford anymore regulation. Politicians tout it as "unfunded mandates" but what they NEVER say is that they - themselves - participate in the development of said mandates: County convenes a committee to "study" - say - the encroachment of Japanese Knotweed on salmon habitat. State agency staff participates. The outcome is that the committtee recommends the state promulgate a rule requiring counties to have a Japanese Knotweed control program. Voila! Unfunded mandate. Come budget time, county officials say the Japanese Knotweed Control program is sacrosant becase: the State requires it! I think a possible way out of this quagmire is to have the citizenry vote on current county services. Take the ranked list and fund as far down as the money will allow. Everything south of that line is cut. Period. Represent the people and not the special interest groups that have lobbied-for and profitted from the development of evermore governmental "programs".

BlueLight

Posted Thu, Oct 1, 2:07 p.m. Inappropriate

"... put lids on property taxes"

Bring me up to date: what lid is there on property taxes? the State limits the growth of taxes but that limit does not apply to expenditures that are approved by the voters, bond issues, special levies and so on.

kieth

Posted Thu, Oct 1, 4:10 p.m. Inappropriate

Robinsion is confused. While the sterile environment of academia seems to have little to offer on the subject of leadership, Robinson incorrectly applies what little he can scrounge up. It's not the County Executive's role to "turn up the heat" on the tax-payer; the general tax-payer is not subordinate, nor any other public servant.

g

Login or register to add your voice to the conversation.

Join Crosscut now!
Subscribe to our Newsletter

Follow Us »