How did we forget civility?

Technology has made us do stupid and inhuman things. Remember when phone calls were matters of personal dignity and privacy?

Sign of the technology-tormented times

Sign of the technology-tormented times

For ten years, we have been particularly bombarded with technology. Great new wealth has come to a few, and all manner of wealth, great and small, has also been lost to many. We have played with excess and excess has played with us. We have felt the soar of confidence and the awful bite of no confidence.The very mind of our attentions has gone to market, as technology has been unleashed upon every person's waking moments, via phone, ipod, text, email, twitter, app, and laptop. It is an unfiltered barrage. We have little bandwidth left of our own reflective time.

As a result, some very stern truths, facts really, have been lost, forgotten, untaught, or trampled in the rush. In some cases, it is courtesy abandoned, in other cases it is contagious self-interest overwhelming the senses and reason.

Today, there is the technological sophistication to watch a first run movie on one's phone, yet to have only the merest notion of manners and no sense that you should have sense. One complexity has overwhelmed another; distraction has deleted consciousness and form.

So, as we head into a new decade, here's my plea to get, or set, a few things straight — reminders of things that were true, that are yet true.

1. Your phone calls are private and you are obliged to keep them so. Thirty years ago there were phone booths to help. Then, of course, you could also stroll safely in public spaces. Now the security of booths and public spaces is betrayed, and there is barbed wire circling your old reservoir. The booth was an act of dignity, not prudery.

No one should be forced to to listen to your cell phone conversation any more than they should be forced to sit through your ablutions. It is a quiet flinch to see adults moving down the street cocked to their phones or talking bluetooth to their breath — oblivious, unnatural, unrelating. Whatever relation might have happened, whatever interaction or notice or acknowledgement has been abandoned — each phone user a kind of tinted-window-up SUV moving through, something unhuman.

2. The sidewalk is for pedestrians, not for bicycles, horses, segways, or scooters. Perhaps it is the unnature of the phone users that has stripped pedestrians of their senses, their rights, their place, their value. No vehicles should ever have a say on the sidewalk. Ironically, it is much worse in Seattle than in New York City, where they would never allow such a thing.

Seattle is a big town, wanting to become a city. Technology has brought the money but not the players and not the dignity, not the people's boots properly on the ground. The pedestrian is the very proof of a city and should have not a moment's fear of some moving machine. The pedestrian is not an accessory but in fact the point, and in any great city or town. It is the pedestrian signalling its health.

When the police move their bike riding to the street, they will better understand and enact conditions to make the road safe for bikes. The horses, of course, already know they should not be on the sidewalk.

3. You were meant to drink your coffee at the coffee shop. A to-go coffee was once no more common than a to-go drink at a bar. The coffee shop was meant to be a break, as in "take a break." At its best, you went where your father went, they asked about the kids and the game, and you were part of something. If you want to see a little of it, try Caffe Senso Unico, on Olive Way behind Pacific Place, where Mario and company set a life every morning.

Technology compresses time to its own clock, to its own rush, so you need to resist it and use some sense. It is madness to carry boiling coffee, tying up one hand, a foolish waste of resources, the cup and lid, unleashed onto a city, the last drips onto your clothes. Protect your coffee shop: Talk to them, look them in the eye. And for god's sake, complain if it becomes a wifi morgue, a fate that may indeed be worse, another death by unrelation.

4. When a store has a sale before Christmas, then your heart should go out to that business, for they are going out of business. But when a store or company discounts at all times, that is a different matter. That is an act of aggression, outside any code of community.

The internet is no naif; it has lured salesmen, marketers, and carpetbaggers to its pitch at a Crusade-like pace. Your modest comforts may not keep track of the effects on stores and streets and towns as their vitality weakens. Continuous discounts have but one goal — domination — for they have lain siege to all the other stores, and they intend to destroy them. There is no other purpose: They have opted for pure self interest, and the hope that savings to you will distract you from the longer consequences. Everyone knew this 50 years ago but in this new rush of time, no one wants to know it now.

5. There has always been an intricate code and ballet to driving a car. But in this new time, the vehicles are zipped and tinted, armed with dvd, speaker, phone, jack, padded as a running shoe, as unrelated as a shark, travelling as its own proof of isolation, purpose and force, its own validation of technology. Courtesy has little chance or hope, for technology has no pact with courtesy, which has become a weakness. Should your left lane suddenly narrow, the car behind will not slow up but in fact speed up and make it clear, once and for time, who rules!

Even the rules have lost some sense as they try to keep up. It is not, for example, possible to safely turn right, as allowed, on a red light. It is not possible to both look left for oncoming cars and still keep a sense of pedestrians or bikes or strollers on your right. It may be an aid to keeping intersections clear but the task of the turn is, in any true sense of driving, a threat and a risk.

6. Digestion is aided by water and oatmeal will keep you regular. How did this knowledge get lost? My friend Alberto ordered coffee for us in Italy and they brought two espressos and two waters. When I went back and ordered, they only brought the espresso. I asked Albert why and he said, they did not think you would notice. (He even told them I noticed.) Italy has a very low rate of stomach and colon trouble and they often credit the wine but the Italians credit the water. They drink it with everything, they never store it in plastic and they always know where it came from. So many apps for your phone, so little thought to your water. (And be careful of purified water; even the supplier admitted to me " it gives some of us a funny stomach.")

And oatmeal, poor oatmeal, that once was a surety to keep you regular, clean the pipes, set you up for a new day, calm the bowels. Maybe it was the sabotage of the instructions: 2/3 cup of oatmeal. No one has 2/3 of anything at 6 am. It is 1 to 3, you can use the toothbrush cup if need be. One cup oatmeal, three of water, the revenge of a different kind of nerd, the digestionist.

7. You must wash your hands. As simple as that, you must wash your hands, five, six times a day, with soap and a clean towel. It is a strange epidemic, the distance of people from their hands. The washing, literally the washing, can stop a virus, block a flu, protect a nation. Yet it may take government intervention to get people to wash. It is a weird late modernism that can distance people from hand washing, when so much of their work involves transmission by hand and hand-helds.

Ah, but you say you don't have the time? In truth, it is not even possible to go faster than washing your hands — or changing the bag in a vacuum cleaner. It only seems so.


Topics: Lifestyle, Food

About the Author

Peter Miller is owner of Peter Miller Books, a store in Seattle specializing in architecture and design books. You can reach him in care of editor@crosscut.com.

Like what you just read? Support high quality local journalism. Become a member of Crosscut today!

Comments:

Posted Tue, Jan 5, 7:19 a.m. Inappropriate

Dear technophobe, 1. Your private conversations are private without regard to the addition, or absense, of technology. You are obligated to keep them so.

Mr Baker

Posted Tue, Jan 5, 7:48 a.m. Inappropriate

2. Perhaps blaming the nature of the common social use of wireless telephones for a technologies and problems that predated it by a few decades, such as the bicycle, for clogging up sidewalks is absurd.
I think that people riding bikes, roller skating, and rollng hoops with sticks on sidewalks, was a problem on sidewalks about a century ago.

Bananna peals on the boardwalk in ny was an issue back then, as well, with shipping technology delivering cheap produce on the East Coast. Try blaming banana delivering steamships on the to-go coffee cup, or wireless telephone.

Mr Baker

Posted Tue, Jan 5, 8:40 a.m. Inappropriate

Nicely put, Mr. Miller. And also a special thanks to Mr. Baker, for demonstrating your point.

nludd

Posted Tue, Jan 5, 3:38 p.m. Inappropriate

Very nicely put!

mikemcc

Posted Tue, Jan 5, 4:53 p.m. Inappropriate

There are some signs of progress on the cell phone front. Amtrak Cascades requires people to carry on extended conversations in the loud areas between cars, and Metro and other cities' bus services have signs up with the prototypical air-headed woman blabbering away while people around her are annoyed. But the signs are few and far between.

I wonder if there really has been a decline in civility, as is often alleged. I hear such comments frequently from baby boomers or older people, but such a thing is hard to quantify.

Posted Tue, Jan 5, 5:11 p.m. Inappropriate

Along with people on cellphones, how about dogs on those retractable 12-foot leashes as a sign of sidewalk rudeness?

I'll keep my walking coffee though. That, like jaywalking, is a sign of a healthy city.

mhays

Posted Tue, Jan 5, 5:51 p.m. Inappropriate

Thanks for the well put reminders, Peter. The only thing I don't agree with is the oatmeal routine. I grew up having to eat some horribly mushy stuff called Zoom! and to this day, I don't go near anything that even resembles it. I'll stick to my smoothies made with frozen fruit harvested from our garden. Heck, maybe I could throw in a little oatmeal for good measure. Wishing you a civilized year ...

Posted Tue, Jan 5, 9:49 p.m. Inappropriate

I suppose it is best that we smile, and agree, even though the fundimental attribution error keeps repeating through this well written idillic vision of a non-existant past.

People talking on cell phones someone else while facing you and making eye contact has less to do with the introduction of that technology, and more to do with our negotiation of social acceptability of the intrusion of any technology.
I, for example, take issue with the printing press, and the end consumers that leave the product littering local cafés. It is not the newspaper, but that reader that is at fault, and our collective acceptance of behaviour. Point is that rude people do not always agree with the situational social graces in relation to any technology, or no tecknology.

Attributing public rudeness to some thing as the cause is false logic.

The cell phone is not rude, the person is rude and they happen to have a cell phone.

Mr Baker

Posted Tue, Jan 5, 10:27 p.m. Inappropriate

Bravo, Mr. Miller. Boorishness needs to be pilloried wherever it is found, and it is to be found everwhere in our time, irrespective of class. I confess some trepidation, however, at your thunderbolt # 5: left lanes rarely 'suddenly end;' boors - and they are numerous - always find the left lane narrowing because they race to be at the head of the line in order to cut in at the expense of their more courteous and patient peers in the right lane. How is is that behavior that is not tolerated in other queues is acceptable if the BOOR is behind the wheel of an automobile?

nordicelt

Posted Wed, Jan 6, 10:30 a.m. Inappropriate

Amen, Mr. Miller. I agree with Mr Baker's third point, that the cell phone is not rude. People are rude.

I can't tell you how many times I've seen old people standing on the bus, hanging on for dear life, as much younger people stare at their cell phones, itouches, or ipods, pretending not to see them. It's like the information on their handheld device is SO interesting it constricts their peripheral vision and eliminates all sense of decorum.

Not likely. It's more likely that their parents sent them out into the world without teaching them manners.

Willie

Login or register to add your voice to the conversation.

Join Crosscut now!
Subscribe to our Newsletter

Follow Us »