The Vancouver method: Treat addicts as people

Dr. Gabor Maté offers advice based on his life treating street addicts in Vancouver. Seattle and pro-legalization advocates could take some lessons in policy and relating to individuals.

Dr. Gabor Maté's book

Booksense.com

Dr. Gabor Maté's book

A Tibetan chakra or <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bhavacakra">wheel of becoming</a>

Philipp Roelli, via Wikimedia Commons

A Tibetan chakra or wheel of becoming

One of the six realms in the Buddhist Wheel of Life is the Realm of Hungry Ghosts, in which people try to fulfill their yearnings or relieve their pain in ways that only deepen their misery. In his book, In the Realm of Hungry Ghosts: Close Encounters with Addiction, Dr. Gabor Maté leads us through this dark territory, beginning with stories about the many individuals he has treated at his clinic for street addicts in Vancouver, BC.

He also tells about the self-medicating habits he developed in his own life, in a way that ultimately makes his personal history the reader's story as well. Although most of us manage (like Maté) to avoid substance addictions, we do get hooked on striving for social success, romance, power, wealth, approval, or material possessions. “Misplaced attachment to what cannot satisfy the soul is ... the common condition of mankind,” he writes.

We've read Buddhism-inspired teachings about the necessity of surrendering our illusions and ego attachments before. What distinguishes Maté’s book is that its wisdom sneaks up on you, being woven into the author’s project of turning what he views as a wasteful, destructive War on Drugs into a more humane and effective, as well as far less costly, social system of approaches to drug addiction.

Maté presents some of the scientific research showing why people keep trying to self-medicate with behaviors or substances that end up making them wretched. He explains how early neglect or abuse affects children’s brain development, in particular the system of self-soothing brain chemicals (such as endorphins and serotonin) that is a natural part of the healthy human organism. As Maté makes clear, this internal chemistry develops (or doesn’t) early on through a child’s relationship with adults: “We know that the majority of chronically hardcore substance-dependent adults lived, as infants and children, under conditions of severe adversity… Their predisposition to addiction was programmed in their early years. Their brains never had a chance.”

In short, people lacking a well-developed brain chemistry that provides internal comfort, self-restraint, and positive energy end up seeking external ways to self-medicate. Those who were more seriously deprived readily turn to drugs. Maté quotes Dr. Nora Volkow, Director of the U.S. National Institute on Drug Abuse, who has concluded from recent brain-imaging studies that “drug addiction is a disease of the brain, and the associated abnormal behavior is the result of dysfunction of brain tissue, just as cardiac insufficiency is a disease of the heart.” Drug use disrupts “brain regions that are important for the normal processes of motivation, reward and inhibitory control in addicted individuals.”

If drug addiction is a disease, why, asks Maté, doesn’t society commit to treating it and easing the pain of those afflicted instead of hounding and punishing them? Because we’re not so different from the addicts who stay on paths they realize will lead to their own destruction. As he says, “Reason and education can’t compete with deep-seated emotional and psychological drives.” So to temper the force of these drives we need to practice what he calls “compassionate curiosity” about our own motives, our choices, and our sometimes needlessly moralistic reactions to others. A “compassionate curiosity” about his patients and their lives is also what helps Maté practice medicine as he does.

The Portland Clinic, where Maté has worked for 8 years, is part of the Portland Hotel Society (PHS) in the gritty Downtown Eastside neighborhood of Vancouver. To supplement its core mission of housing homeless people, PHS has established a free dental clinic, a hospital ward where antibiotics can be used to treat deep-tissue infections intravenously, a bank, an art gallery, and the controversial Insite, North America’s first supervised injection site. Housing at PHS is low-barrier, with residents accepted as they are instead of forced to renounce addiction first, and services follow principles of harm reduction. The overall approach resembles palliative medicine, the care of the terminally ill, in that staff do not directly aim at curing their patients. Maté writes that he and his colleagues try mainly “to ameliorate the effects of drug addiction and its attendant ailments and to soften the impact of the legal and social torments our culture uses to punish the drug addict.” He worries that with the Winter Games coming to Vancouver this year, city policies will make life even harder for street populations.

Still, Maté said at Town Hall last week, he does not recommend decriminalizing drugs, even so-called “less dangerous” ones such as marijuana, which some members of the Washington State Legislature had been seeking to do through bills killed on Wednesday. Instead, he would create policies that strictly regulate addictive substances, that “stop punishing people for their addictions,” and that expand the medical practice of harm reduction. This would include establishing supervised injection sites and would guarantee, for any addict desiring them, rehab followed by housing with wraparound support.

Such services would be affordable if we stopped funding the War on Drugs, says Maté. Many experienced corrections personnel concur. Former Seattle police chief Norm Stamper introduced Maté at Town Hall and, in his own book, Breaking Rank (2006), argues that the War on Drugs is a “war on poor people.” It costs the U.S. more than $69 billion per year, yet succeeds mainly in criminalizing disease, increasing crime, and incarcerating innocents, Stamper says. Current White House drug czar Gil Kerlikowske, also a former police chief in Seattle, has agreed, declaring in an interview last year, “We’re not at war with people in this country.”

How do Maté and his colleagues care with such dedication for so many people in pain who can’t or won’t change their ways? Maté quotes a co-worker as saying, “I try to take my own value system out of it and look at the value something has for them.” Instead of thinking how different an addict’s life could be without the drugs, she said, “I try to take people as they are at any moment and support them that way. Not judge them or think of an alternative reality they could have, because we could all have alternative realities.”

At the same time, writes Maté, “the human potential for transformation” is always present, so we need to “support the addict’s motivation and capacity to choose freedom” over addiction. The neuroplasticity of the brain lets us “promote healthy brain development later in life when the conditions for it have been lacking from earliest childhood onward.” With treatment and with companionship from members of the community who care, some addicts can find the strength to recover. Maté illustrated by reading from Thomas Merton during a meeting at King County United Way the morning after his talk at Town Hall: "To gain possession of ourselves we have to have some confidence, some hope of victory. And in order to keep that hope alive, we must usually have some taste of victory.’” Then Maté said, “An addict with someone relating to him as if he were a person, just the way he is and not ‘if I stop drinking,’ can think, ‘maybe I’m not unlovable the way I am.’ That is a taste of victory.”

The beautifully formal yet sensitive black-and-white photographs of Maté’s patients in his book give readers a chance to relate to the ineradicable personhood of each individual. This is a taste of a different kind of victory — over our own impulses to leave “undeserving” souls outside the human circle of affection and good will.


About the Author

As part of Crosscut’s coverage of social concerns, Judy Lightfoot writes about how the region's people face challenges in a time of economic stress and diminished expectations. She often draws on her weekly one-on-one coffees with individuals sharing our public spaces who are socially isolated by homelessness or mental illness. Formerly a teacher and professor, she also writes about books, education, and the arts. Email judy.lightfoot@crosscut.com.

Like what you just read? Support high quality local journalism. Become a member of Crosscut today!

Comments:

Posted Fri, Jan 22, 4:47 p.m. Inappropriate

Why is this supposed to be a lesson to people seeking reform and legalization? Do you think we don't know this already?

Or maybe we should be looking at the other lesson from this wolf in sheep's clothing. The estimable Mate would keep marijuana illegal, a conclusion reached by none of the major commissions that have studied the matter over the past century, all of which have recommended legalization. Considering that marijuana is literally the safest actual drug we know of, legalizing seems reasonable.

Mate would cast all of us into a world of disability and illness, a world in which the patient has no rights and is eternally at the beck and call of "professionals" making judgments, usually making judgments on subjective criteria, as matters appear to them.

That is the reality of the sick role- the patient is afforded protection from society's normal demands, as long as they do what the doctor orders. It should come as no surprise that this situation, in which the patient has no rights at all, quickly and almost inevitably degenerates into abuse of the patients by the staff- as witnessed by 100,000 people dying each year because of mistakes made by our hospitals, with no industry-wide effort to curb this abuse.

In fact, the 'tilt' of this abuse is generously illustrated by the opening blurb- that advocates of legalization have something to learn from Mate. Having studied these matters up close and personal for about 40 years, including decades of employment as an RN, it sounds to me more like Mate might learn something from advocates for legalization- namely, that there are plenty of perfectly normal people out here who would benefit from not being treated as criminals for a harmless activity involving only themselves- and not being treated as addicts by "helpful" people like Mate when they clearly are not.

Posted Sun, Jan 24, 3:21 p.m. Inappropriate

Serial Catowner, I apologize for my mistaken rendering of what Dr. Mate' said at Town Hall. He does favor decriminalizing drugs, because doing so would take the profit for drugs out of the hands of dealers and would stop sending addicts to jail. But strong restrictions would need to be in place, as I said. Mate' does not recommend legalizing drugs, for example, because it would be folly to allow even more dangerous substances to be readily available at the corner store the way cigarettes and alcohol are. Thank you for your comment, and I hope you (as well as other readers) found the article worthwhile in other respects.

Posted Mon, Jan 25, 11:13 a.m. Inappropriate

As always, thanks for your kind attention to the comment (and what's up with nobody commenting? Like what we're doing isn't costing us an arm and a leg?) Over the years that I have been entirely too close to health care, two big issues have stood out to me.

First, I am entirely unconvinced that restrictions on users serve any valid purpose. Most people- about 99.9% of us- have no desire to take opiates in excess. And most of those who do will suffer few physical consequences as a result of a 'habit' if they can use a reputable product. The key point here is that almost every American at some point will be treated with morphine for pain, and almost none of us have any desire to keep taking it.

Secondly, there is a world of danger in the medical industry, where the "conviction", often based on hearsay and inuendo, has no rights of appeal. You'll be learning a lot more about this soon, as insurance companies become even more aggressive about denying coverage. And this cuts two ways- medical people place very little faith in the previous history of the patient partly because they know just how much bunkum it is. Combine that with a 'prince and pauper' situation of a specialist, who doesn't look beyond his specialty, and his 'nurse', who isn't a nurse at all, and you have the very typical situation of the medical right hand not knowing what the left hand is doing.

That's bad enough as matters stand, but extending that model to a much larger class of people with even vaguer signs and symptoms is a grave mistake.

As I said, legalizers have had literally decades in which to study the results of alternate treatments, and are generally aware of Mate's work. The article was good for the general reader but might well have benefited from mention of other decrim and treatment efforts in Europe.

Posted Mon, Jan 25, 5:01 p.m. Inappropriate

Mate' discusses in his book (and spoke about during his interview on KUOW's Weekday program) the fact that most individuals who use opiates don't become addicted. People generally encounter them, as you suggest, when recovering from surgery, etc., but he also talks about American soldiers in Vietnam who routinely injected with heroin while fighting there yet who easily quit after they returned home. Mate' also describes enlightened drug treatment programs in Switzerland and other European countries. Perhaps I should have talked more about those parts of "Hungry Ghosts."

But (it may be too obvious by now to say) my particular interest in the book was less in the depth and detail of Mate's knowledge in the field than in his effort to help the public cultivate (through self-examination and personal awareness as well as through informing themselves) an attitude toward drug addicts and other sufferers whom we tend mainly to dismiss with fear, judgment, and ostracism. It's what makes his book unusual and distinctive, I think. Readers with greater expertise than mine about drug addiction and treatment are welcome to weigh in - as you did, for which I'm grateful. Perhaps other readers will, too, while this article remains on the home page. Thanks for good conversation here.

Login or register to add your voice to the conversation.

Join Crosscut now!
Subscribe to our Newsletter

Follow Us »