The other morning, my wife saw a yellow Wilson's warbler perched in the old, cracked apple tree in front of our house. When she told me she had seen the bird, I thought north to the Canadian boreal forest where it had probably fledged, and to a third-floor office in Seattle's 1913-vintage Securities Building.
It's in that Seattle office from which the Pew Charitable Trusts have engineered a deal that may be a giant step toward saving huge swaths of that forest. At the end of May, Pew, eight other environmental groups and the Forest Products Association of Canada (FPAC) announced an agreement covering 180 million acres of boreal forest, which has been called the largest conservation agreement in history.
For the next three years, forest products companies will defer cutting key habitat, while they and the environmental groups try to work out the many details of saving it. During that period, the environmental groups will not campaign against sales of the companies' products. The parties can extend the agreement for more than three years.
Critics point out that the agreement doesn't permanently protect all that land, that it merely allows more negotiation, and that in the meantime, the industry is free to cut a whole lot of trees. They see the glass as at least half-empty.
Steven Kallick, who leads the Pew Environment Group's International Boreal Conservation Campaign from that Securities Building office, basically argues that without an agreement of this kind, the glass would be — and was — just about all empty. Global Forest Watch found in 2003 that less than 10 percent of Canada's boreal forest was protected.
When Pew started its campaign, Kallick says, the conservation biologist Reed Noss told it that one could preserve the boreal ecosystems without saving the whole forest. One could succeed by saving only half — but it had to be the right half. Defining and preserving the right half — or more — will be the greens' objective over the next three years.
Critics complain that the agreement has been painted with a broad brush. Kallick agrees. He says that now the parties must figure out exactly where to draw the lines.
On Kallick's office wall hangs a picture of the Ketchikan, Alaska pulp mill being dynamited in 1999, two years after he started working for Pew. Before coming here, Kallick spent 20 years in Alaska, where, as director of the Alaska Rainforest Campaign, he worked on saving the Tongass forest, which was being logged partly to supply the pulp mill. The mill wouldn't have been economically viable without de facto subsidies, but was protected for decades by Alaska's congressional delegation.
People write of the Tongass' vast unbroken tracts of forest, but Tongass roadless areas cover, in total, approximately 9.3 million acres "and most of the remaining tracts are under a million acres each," Kallick says. In contrast, he says, "The scale of wilderness in the boreal dwarfs that, with 1.1 billion acres of remaining roadless areas, and protection proposals on the table covering hundreds of millions of acres." According to Global Forest Watch, he says, seven of the world’s 10 largest remaining old-growth forest tracts are in Canada’s Boreal Forest.
The boreal isn't a “cathedral forest," marked by majestic trees. Kallick explains that the impressive thing about it is not the size of individual trees but the size of the whole. It goes on and on, from the Yukon (actually, from Alaska) to Newfoundland, forming the largest intact forest in in the world.
Up to 5 billion birds breed there, according to the Boreal Songbird Initiative, which occupies part of that Seattle office, including 73 percent of the continent's Swainson's thrushes, 74 percent of its common loons, and 68 percent of all the ruby-crowned kinglets in the world.
The birds share the forest with a host of mammals including the imperiled woodland caribou. Woodland caribou are very sensitive to habitat disturbance. Roads let in predators. Clearcuts increase the populations of deer and elk. Once deer and elk proliferate, cougars show up to eat them, and the big cats aren't averse to dining on caribou as well.
Like what you just read? Support high quality local journalism. Become a member of Crosscut today!