Our Sponsors:

Read more »

Our Members

Many thanks to Joan Poor and Anna Mastroianni & Greg Shaw some of our many supporters.

ALL MEMBERS »

Are passenger-only ferries on the way back?

A new Kingston-Seattle service is coming and other ideas are following, giving rise to the thought of a resurrected Mosquito Fleet on Puget Sound.
The 'Spirit of Kingston' passenger ferry

The 'Spirit of Kingston' passenger ferry Port of Kingston

Passenger-only ferry service on Puget Sound continues to make a comeback, with the announcement of a proposed schedule for a Kingston-Seattle foot ferry, and more car-free possibilities on routes as far north as the San Juan Islands.

Could Washington State see a return to the era of the “Mosquito Fleet,” the swarm of passenger-only steamers that covered the Sound before the automobile pushed pedestrian travel aside?

In Kingston the answer appears to be yes. Scheduled to begin service in mid-October, the Kingston-to-Seattle SoundRunner will join two other passenger-only routes on Puget Sound: Kitsap Transit's Port Orchard-Bremerton-Annapolis service and the King County water taxi, which ferries people from West Seattle to the downtown waterfront. Interest in the expansion of car-free service is widespread, and more foot ferries are likely to join the roster in years ahead.

The Port of Kingston is seeking public feedback on its draft schedule, which calls for the Spirit of Kingston to make two morning and two afternoon rush-hour round-trips, weekdays only, between the north Kitsap community and Seattle's Colman Dock. The ship will cover the 20-mile crossing in 45 minutes, cruising at 25 knots, or about 29 miles an hour. The round-trip adult fare will be $15.

Kingston purchased two craft for SoundRunner last March. While the Spirit covers the commuter run between Kingston and Seattle, the Victoria Express will serve as a backup vessel. Both ships will be available for charters when not in scheduled service. The ferry will call at the port's own dock in Kingston; the nearby Washington State Ferries dock cannot accommodate the port's ships, which are far smaller than the big car ferries that the state operates.

The Port of Kingston received $3.5 million in federal funding to purchase the ships and ready them for service but anticipates operating them without a subsidy, according to ferry program manager Eric Osnes. Passenger fares and charter income will cover the bills, he expects. By comparison, the state's car ferries recover only 65% of their expenses through fares.

“Pretty remarkable — the little port that could,” Bruce Agnew said of Kingston's low-budget startup. “It's the model for the rest of the Sound.” Agnew is a prominent foot-ferry backer and the director of Seattle's Cascadia Center, a transportation policy think tank.

The port will seek to avoid the fate of Aqua Express, which operated a passenger-only Kingston-Seattle ferry for nine months in 2005. It suffered a death of a thousand cuts: an oversized ship, passenger-unfriendly schedule changes, and spiking fuel prices coupled with what Osnes termed “fuel consumption that was out of this world compared to us.”

Osnes conceded that operating SoundRunner without a subsidy “is going to be a challenge.” Close coordination with terra-firma transit is a must if the port intends to fill the Spirit, which accommodates 150 passengers. The port is working with Kitsap Transit and Jefferson Transit so that buses will get commuters to the dock at the right time and meet returning commuters to take them home.

“It's going to be door-to-door,” he noted.

The port is thus placing its bets on car-free commuting, no small ambition in a society built around automobiles. The Kingston-Seattle service will cater to the environmentally conscious. The passage will consume about 60 gallons of marine diesel, which translates into 50 passenger-miles per gallon — roughly analogous to a 50-mpg car with one person in it — if the ship is full. The state ferry system does not keep data on its ships, but the best available figures indicate that its ferries manage only around 10 passenger-miles per gallon.

In accordance with a 2007 legislative directive, the state got out of the passenger-only ferry business last year, turning its attention instead to maintaining its aging fleet of car ferries.

The state's departure from passenger-only service has encouraged fresh ideas in places other than Kingston, too. Kitsap Transit has operated its foot ferries since 2003, and pedestrian ferries have been plying routes between downtown Seattle and both West Seattle and Vashon Island since the1990s.


Like what you just read? Support high quality local journalism. Become a member of Crosscut today!

Comments:

Posted Tue, Aug 17, 2:58 p.m. Inappropriate

The problem with a passenger only ferry is that it's not cost effective to move small numbers of people on water. Ferries are fuel in-efficient and time wise slow. The other problem is that state law forbids competition with public ferries, so that there are no private water taxis for anyone to take a private trip from anywhere you'd want to live to anywhere you can work.

There should be some water taxi's that run all hours, that go from beach front to beach front.

As for using private ferry service like Argosy, that's a non starter as they are only profitable if they pay lower wages than state ferry workers, and do no boat maintence. As the city of Seattle found out with the West Seattle Ferry.

GaryP

Posted Tue, Aug 17, 7:12 p.m. Inappropriate

Having recently moved to Portland Maine, look to the Casco Bay ferry system for a good model. Lots of passenger ferries providing not only basic transportation but excursions, music and food cruises, and people just getting out on the water for a fun day out. Works here! Interesting looking at historic photos that many of the early 20th century steamers linking the islands here are almost identical to the Mosquito Fleet of Puget Sound at the same time. Some folks were smart enough to keep up the tradition! Even new passenger ferries being built here have similar hull lines to the early 20th century fleet. It CAN work, if folks want it to.

Posted Wed, Aug 18, 1:38 a.m. Inappropriate

Consider it like light rail, with higher operating costs, but that balanced against VASTLY lower start-up expenses, and near infinite routing flexibility. It's a darn pleasant way to commute, too.

Roofus

Posted Wed, Aug 18, 12:09 p.m. Inappropriate

Passenger-only ferries don't make money. They require a tax/fee subsidy, just like bus service, or very high fares. Kitsap Transit uses sales tax funds. Metro uses property taxes. The state used to use the Motor Vehicle Excise Tax until it was voted off the books. San Francisco uses a portion of toll revenues off the Golden Gate Bridge.

Nostalgia aside, the mosquito fleet went out of business because they couldn't make a profit serving the cross-sound market.

Which tax/fee source should be raised or what other priorities should be set aside to pay for this pleasant way to commute?

It is also a red herring to say that part of the problem is the state law forbidding competition with public ferries, because state law also forbids competition with private ferries. Any ferry operator must get a certificate to serve a route and, once blessed, is then protected from competition. These laws were passed in recognition of the difficulty of making money in this business and the need to limit competition.

Login or register to add your voice to the conversation.

Join Crosscut now!
Subscribe to our Newsletter

Follow Us »