Punishing the UW for success
The state expects the UW to be both "racehorse and workhorse," and on a starvation diet. The university's only recourse: lowering educational quality and privatizing.
The budgetary ax has loudly thunked into Washington state's flagship university. The state is one of seven without an income tax, and the public won't let prisons be closed or K-12 education be starved. It's also harder for the legislature to restrict funding for community colleges when every lawmaker has one in his or her district, making such cuts politically risky for the local rep.
The University of Washington, on the other hand, belongs to us all. And so one of the finest public universities in the nation has lost 33 percent of the state funding it had 15 months ago — a total of $134 million.
In Sunday's Chronicle of Higher Education (Aug. 29) Paul Fain analyzes the the UW's vulnerable position in contrast, for example, to Washington's community colleges. There, the state through fluctuations over the past 10 years has increased its support 28 percent overall, while at the UW during the same decade, funding ups and downs have resulted in an overall decline of 12 percent.
In many respects, writes Fain, the UW's success in landing research dollars has wound up costing it dearly. It's the No. 1 public university in the nation in terms of federal grant-getting power and success, but most of this money ends up in such coffers as the UW Medical School's, where it provides no support for undergraduate education.
Still, the state looks at this revenue stream and the things it buys (a new molecular-engineering building is being constructed on the still-beautiful campus) and says, essentially, "What do you need us for?" Fain quotes Randy Hodgins, UW vice president for external affairs, as saying, "Our success is what's doing us in."
With money so short, the quality of the undergraduate educational experience is sinking, according to Fain's report. Students face larger class sizes and fewer of the research opportunities that have helped build the university's strong national reputation. Lab classes have been cut from science courses, and field research in several departments is unaffordable.
To keep educational quality at least above mediocre, the UW has been forced to privatize. In decades past it was a place where everybody's kid had a chance to go to school, if qualified, because state subsidies kept tuition low. Now for the first time, Fain writes, the UW is at the point where, in order to cover costs, the total income from tuition will be higher than the total funding from the state. A number of seats have been set aside for applicants who are Washington residents, but (as in state universities elsewhere these days) the UW is having to reduce the number of places for which Washington state youngsters can apply, to make room for increasing numbers of out-of-state students, who pay much higher tuition.
Fain quotes UW President Mark Emmert as saying that unlike businesses and sports teams, the UW can't threaten to move away — "so that means you take us for granted." If a private company the size of the university had in the past declared that it was folding its tent, Emmert told Fain, the legislature would have rushed in with major concessions and support — as it did, for years, for Boeing.
Details about the UW's annual $9.1 billion contribution to the Washington state economy appear in a fascinating analysis published by The Daily last July. Indeed, in the words Fain reports from a conversation with Ana Mari Cauce, dean of the College of Arts and Sciences, "We are the state's racehorse and its workhorse."
That is, the UW is sleek, muscular, and supremely gifted in the quality of its faculty, its schools in fields such as medicine and law, and its graduate research programs. It races competitively while being hitched (underfed) to heavyweight responsibilities for educating tens of thousands of undergraduates, granting 40 percent of the bachelor's degrees conferred in the state, and running an institution so big that the jobs, the free health care, and the thousands of student and faculty volunteer hours it provides for the community have become a critical part of what keeps the state afloat.
Fain helps you understand how, in a state where legislators don't seem to grasp the fact that undergraduate education can't be funded by federal research grants, the UW became its own worst enemy by succeeding.
A snippet of "Cuts Intensify Identity Crisis for Washington's Flagship Campus," by Paul Fain (with Stephen Brashear's gorgeous, ominous photo of Suzzallo Library under heavy clouds) is on the Chronicle website, with full text available to subscribers only.
Like what you just read? Support high quality local journalism. Become a member of Crosscut today!










Twitter
Facebook
RSS Feeds
Comments:
Posted Wed, Sep 1, 1:17 p.m. Inappropriate
The underfunding of the UW is a tragic example of how, in times of budget crunch, there is a temptation to make cost saving decisions today which have many times greater harm tomorrow. With higher education being pushed farther out of reach, fewer Washingtonians will have undergraduate degrees in the future, which undercuts one of the key reasons why we are attractive to the companies that power the state's economy, such as Microsoft. It also exacerbates economic inequality, since a college degree is one of the major determinants of how much a person can earn. I'm glad that you spelled out the distinction between grant money and state funding, since the two are not interchangeable. Neither is state funding generally interchangeable with philanthropic support, since philanthropists generally specify that their donations are used for specific purposes.
Even more disturbing is that the budget cuts in the past couple years are not a novelty, but the continuation of a trend that is decades in the making. The state share of the university's budget has been in steady decline since about 1980, which represents a shift in the perception of legislators from universities being a public good to being a private good.
However, I wouldn't consider the shift of attention toward community colleges to be necessarily a bad thing. Community colleges play a very important role: they provide education for people who cannot afford or are not ready for a four year university, who need to learn specific skills, and who are working. There very well may be a shift in the model of higher education that sees postsecondary education as being contemporaneous with, rather than preceding, one's career, and universities, with all their institutional inertia, are not prepared for this shift.
Posted Wed, Sep 1, 8:32 p.m. Inappropriate
The UW did do itself any favors with the legislature when in the last two sessions it made funding for a new football stadium as it's top project instead of oh let's say undergraduate education. President Gee of Ohio State visits all 88 counties in Ohio every year to let these counties and community leaders know what Ohio State does and how important Ohio State is to the state and the community. Compare that to Mark Emmert and his predecesors. When was the last time Mark Emmert made an appearance in Pacific County or Asotin County to tout the University of Washington.and how much it means to the state. The UW has only it's own arrogance to blame for it's lack of support.
The UW was never a supporter of branch campuses until WSU wanted to build a branch campus in Tacoma. Then low and behold the UW was in support of branch campuses. The UW was not a big supporter of evening and weekend degree programs until The Evergreen State College showed what a huge success it could be in the community... All of sudden UW has weekend and evening programs.
There's a reason the UW nickname is arrogance on the lake. Don't blame the legislature and the public when the UW doesnt get it's priority straight and do the needed community outreach that has made Ohio State so successful.
Posted Thu, Sep 2, 6:27 a.m. Inappropriate
Is anyone else having trouble paying their property taxes?
I contributed mightily to the college economy (two bachelors, one associate and one is in graduate school).
I had to cut a lot of logs to make those payments and along the way I questioned many programs.
Colleges are basically false economies supported by thousands of umbilical cords full of money flowing in. What in their nature would compel them to be efficient?
Login or register to add your voice to the conversation.