Oil-soaked oysters, contaminated salmon, 'radioactive' wine

We're living the effects of the BP oil spill and fearing a proposed open-pit mine near Bristol Bay. Should we worry about our own state's vineyards and orchards growing so close to Hanford's plutonium?


NYC.andre via Flicker

How to eat, what to eat, is the new question of our time, but we have become introspective and fearful in this Internet age. We wash our hands with germicidal soap, only to learn that the antibacterial chemical triclosan penetrates the skin and messes with our endocrine system. We buy “fat-free” half & half made with corn syrup solids, sugar, and carrageenan.
Carnauba wax, used for polishing cars when we were kids, is in today's processed foods by the ton. Prohibitionists say alcohol kills our brain cells, but we drink a glass of wine anyway hoping it will strengthen our immune system. In the name of food safety, our governments cozy up to Big Agriculture.
  
A recent Seattle Times story detailed new problems facing oyster growers on the Hood Canal: rising acidity levels in Puget Sound waters. But there are far more serious environmental threats to our food supply — one by land and two by sea.
 
The first, BP's recently capped underwater gusher, devastated the Gulf of Mexico's fishing industry. The second, a proposed open-pit mine in Alaska, could extinguish the salmon run in Bristol Bay. And the third, a vast heap of nuclear waste at the Hanford Nuclear Reservation, threatens eastern Washington's agricultural heartland and world-renowned vineyards.
 

* * * 

“Doonesbury” skewered BP's inept public response to the Gulf oil-rig explosion, and questions about seafood safety also found their way into the comic strip: Blackened shrimp, oil-soaked scallops, and tar-encrusted crab were all on the menu at the fast-food emporium where Zonker works. 

In Seattle, the mood is grim. Kevin Davis, co-owner of Steelhead Diner and Blueacre Seafood, knows more than anyone in town what the stakes are. A native of Louisiana whose father was a drilling superintendent for Shell Oil, Davis grew up fishing in bayous and marshes that are now black with tar. Still, he's hopeful: “The fisherman know it's bad, but they're saying, 'Don't abandon us.' ” 

Davis' professional colleagues around the country agree. Chefs Collaborative, a national organization that fosters a sustainable food system, published a booklet last month, titled "Foods at Risk in the Gulf Coast," that was both cautionary and motivational. "As chefs, we need to support Gulf food producers as best we can,” it concluded. “Our support is critical to keeping our food culture alive and the local economy from collapsing."   

Still, WalMart has suspended the sale of seafood in Florida because of rising prices and falling demand. In Seattle, it's hard to find "Gulf Prawns” or “Louisiana Crabmeat” on the menu anywhere. Crayfish, being a freshwater species, are safe so far, although at last report oil had found its way into the larvae of blue crab and fiddler crab, a particularly bad sign for the speckled trout that feed on the crustaceans. To say nothing of the disruption of the bluefin tuna's spawning grounds in the Gulf. But the least fortunate of the Gulf's creatures would appear to be its oysters, once wildly abundant, now on the road to extinction. And the Gulf's communities of African-American oystermen, sad to say, appear to have been excluded from the (paying) jobs of cleaning up the mess.  

We shouldn't feel smug just because we're up here in the Pacific Northwest. Kevin Davis told me, discussing the Gulf oil disaster, “Anybody who drives a car is implicated.” 

For its part, BP has been running ads saying, "We'll make this right." But the company also claims that in order to pony up the $20 billion it's promised in damages, it has to continue deep-water drilling. 

* * * 

Chef Davis is also at the forefront of another environmental battle, 1,600 miles in the opposite direction from Seattle. Alaska's Bristol Bay, southwest of Anchorage and surrounded by thousands of square miles of Alaskan tundra, is "home" to half the world's wild sockeye salmon: Some 60 million animals pass through the bay enroute to their spawning grounds. It's a majestic landscape, inhabited only by a handful of native villages. Except for the salmon fishery out on the treacherous waters, there's no industry. “Vote with your fork,” says the promotional literature in a dozen Seattle restaurants that serve Bristol Bay salmon. 
 
Enter the developers in the form of Northern Dynasty, parent company of a mining project called the Pebble Partnership. A
 wealth of minerals lies beneath the tundra, and Pebble wants it. Gold, copper, molybdenum, silver, rhenium, palladium. The land was opened to mining in the waning days of the Bush administration, and the project had the enthusiastic support of Alaska's former governor, Sarah Palin. Trouble is, getting at the riches would require a vast open-pit mine, the world's biggest, on the headwaters of Bristol Bay. The pit would measure 15 miles across; the dam to hold back the mine's toxic tailings would be 700 feet high and 4.5 miles across, the world's most massive, bigger than the Three Gorges Dam in China, and built on a seismic fault.  

Davis, along with Seth Caswell of Emmer & Rye (and head of the Seattle Chefs Collaborative), is worried about the threats the mine would pose to Alaska's native culture. John Shively, on the other hand, CEO of the Pebble Partnership, says the chefs don't understand the project or appreciate what it could do for the people of the region.

Going a step further, a former Alaska legislator, Gail Phillips, last year called for a boycott of the Seattle restaurants supporting Bristol Bay. In response, Zach Lyons, spokesman for a group of Seattle farmers markets, said, “Just because no permits have been issued or applied for does not mean people concerned with the potential of this proposed mine should not already be taking action. Once permits start happening with mine projects, it is often too late."   

* * * 

So here's one that hasn't happened yet. Can't happen, won't happen, we convince ourselves. Trouble is, if it were to happen, there's no blow-out preventer to stop it.  

The Hanford Nuclear Reservation, adjoining the Columbia River in Eastern Washington, is “home” to this country's largest stockpile of plutonium waste. The Columbia Valley wine region, covering virtually the entire Columbia basin, is also the country's largest AVA (American Viticultural Area), by acreage. 


Like what you just read? Support high quality local journalism. Become a member of Crosscut today!

Comments:

Posted Tue, Sep 14, 1:54 p.m. Inappropriate

Without a doubt this is the worst researched article I have seen in crosscut. Some hugely bad assumptions.
"plutonium stockpile sitting atop its vineyards" ok look at a map. Look at where the Vinyards's are. Look at where the mountains are. Look at where Hanford is.
If you are done with your frank stupidity, worry more about Boardmans coal plant. Any escaping radioactivity or chemicals (far worse then the glow in the dark stuff) was deposited in the air (just like Chernobyl) north east of Handford. The groundwater stuff may seep into the Columbia river, and just might- might be able to be detected above natures normal usual background radiation.

dman

Posted Thu, Sep 16, 12:41 p.m. Inappropriate

Kudos to Ron Holden for this thought-provoking piece. Thanks for shining a spotlight on the risks to Bristol Bay.

pdobbyn

Posted Sat, Sep 18, 10:58 a.m. Inappropriate

Thanks to those who saw this post for what it was: an informal review of three threats facing our food supply. dman, there was no claim to original research, just summarizing existing articles. But since you bring it up, Hanford is close enough to the orchards, fields and vineyards that ANY radioactive leak would cripple Washington's ability to export its agricultural products.

Meantime, at your suggestion,I'd be happy to worry about Boardman; send details to me via editor@crosscut.com.

Posted Sun, Sep 19, 12:27 p.m. Inappropriate

"ANY radioactive leak would cripple Washington's ability to export its agricultural products."

Leak how? Where? There have been many "releases" (leaks?)in my understanding over its inception. Your "summation" just panders to non scientific emotional hysteria.

I'm not trying to be snide, It is just that when I have spent time in hazard mitigation, been at both the Hanford and Umatilla sites, talked worked, raised children with the engineers and workers that deal with these hazards over their careers. We didn't ask for the federal government to put it here. We don't need Big city folk distorting what we have over here, or criticize(in other commentary's)that some people make a living cleaning up what your government created.

Your type of writing does help focus the government on continuing the cleanup. Sometimes it takes a distortion of facts and reality to motivate those that subscribe to that kind of reality.

Boardman? http://lmgtfy.com/?q=boardman+power+plant+%20emissions

dman

Posted Wed, Sep 22, 1:52 a.m. Inappropriate

"The slightest leak, however remote the possibility, would compromise the state's image and stature as an agricultural breadbasket."

Indeed? I have read artices published in The Seattle PI several years ago which reported a leaking plume of radioactive waste which was then known to be nearing the Columbia River. From that I have strongly suspected it has long ago reached the river and its existence has since been covered up/ignored. Is that not true?

boboh7

Posted Wed, Sep 22, 9:59 a.m. Inappropriate

It's my understanding the contaminated ground water is being dealt with by using curtains of grout injected underground and also chemical binders.

As I alluded to before, any leaking, spreading of contamination would certainly be exposed by the people that live and work here. It just means more cleanup jobs!
This is a federal government problem located in Washington state. Fortunately we get a lot of help from Portland because when we flush our toilets it soon sails past those upscale Portland eatery's.
All in all, this outlandish scare piece just makes more money for us.If we can get the oyster, salmon and wine people fooled into thinking that somehow the "vast heap of nuclear waste at the Hanford Nuclear Reservation, threatens eastern Washington's agricultural heartland and world-renowned vineyards." Sorry ROTFLMAO

dman

Login or register to add your voice to the conversation.

Join Crosscut now!
Subscribe to our Newsletter

Follow Us »