Seattle should invite the world (again)

The 50th anniversary of the Seattle World's Fair could shape up to be an entertaining, even important, brainstorming session about the city's future. So let's not be shy about asking for ideas  from the rest of the world.

The Space Needle became a city landmark with the 1962 World's Fair.

Vintage Seattle

The Space Needle became a city landmark with the 1962 World's Fair.

The U.S. Science Pavilion (now the Pacific Science Center) during the Seattle World's Fair in 1962.

National Archives

The U.S. Science Pavilion (now the Pacific Science Center) during the Seattle World's Fair in 1962.

Too early to think about the next 50 years?

Not really. Especially if you're planning an event in 2012 to do just that. The Seattle Center Foundation is leading the effort to commemorate the 50th anniversary of the Seattle World's Fair of 1962, but like the fair itself, they want the event to be forward-looking.

Which makes sense for all kinds of reasons, one being that you have to be in your mid-fifties or older to even remember the '62 fair. Another is that world's fairs, in the U.S. anyway, are considered relics. The last one in North America was in Vancouver, B.C. in 1986, more than a generation ago. To demonstrate how far fairs have fallen out of vogue, consider that the '62 fair was the way the city chose to commemorate the 50th anniversary of the Alaska-Yukon-Pacific (AYP) Exposition of 1909. Plans for Century 21's Golden Anniversary are much more modest.

But according to the Center Foundation's Todd Burely, the preliminary scheme is in keeping with the vision of that fair, which not only showcased the New Frontier (or make that the "Mad Men" era) but remade Seattle and its brand. I asked Burley to sketch out for me how he thought the fair celebration would be organized, and though it's somewhat early, he gave me a sketch at least as good as the one Eddie Carlson scrawled on a place mat when he conceived the Space Needle.

Seattle Century 21 Exposition was approximately six months long (April-October). Burley says the anniversary will kick off on April 21, 2012 and that each of the six months will have a theme. The idea is to start and sustain a look at the next half century and Seattle's role in the world. So the themes, not unlike the themed pavilions one still finds at world's fairs, focus on areas of specific interest to Seattle, such as Sustainability, Global Health, Science and Technology, Commerce and the Innovation Economy, Learning, and Civic Action. Woven through all six months would be Arts, Culture and Design.

So while nostalgia is important — you can, for example, go to the Center Foundation's "Next Fifty" web page and enter your fair memories, film footage and photos in a "Time Capsule," the celebration seeks to be a catalyst for important conversations about "where next?" Currently, volunteer committees are being assembled to begin to plan the activities for each themed month. "We want to have a conversation about what the future will be," says Burley.

In addition, the celebration will tie-in with other major events. For example, the Pacific Science Center will be hosting the new "blockbuster" King Tut exhibit during the anniversary (May 2012 to January '13). A previous Tut exhibit, in 1978, seized Seattle and drew over 1 million visitors. The hope is that other exhibits, performances, conventions etc. will also connect with the themes. One idea being kicked around, says Burley, is to showcase an updated version of the popular fair's mid-century "House of the Future" by creating a new one in sync with sustainable living (forget "Jetson's" living and think of a solar-powered 500-square-foot micro house). Burley says they also hope to have an exhibit of Century 21 history installed for the duration of the six-month anniversary.

So while the celebration isn't a world's fair itself, it could act as a kind of updated supplement to the one we already had. Virtually all of the suggested themes were the subject of 1962's content, ranging from model cities to video phones, library science, computers, and atomic cars. The themes also reflect some of Seattle's enduring strengths, such as technology (Boeing and Microsoft) and civic-mindedness (Forward Thrust, citizen activism). Burley says it also adds post-fair strengths, such as in arts, culture, and design.

In 1962, Seattle was still infamously regarded as a "cultural dustbin" but the fair helped to change that perception by showcasing Northwest pre-Grunge modernism, from the poetry of Theodore Roethke to the paintings of Morris Graves and Mark Tobey. Or take the case of the Seattle-born architect Minoru Yamasaki, who designed the U.S. Pavilion for the fair, now the Science Center. That brought him to the attention of the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, who hired him to design the World Trade Center's twin towers.

In 2009, Seattle recognized the Centennial of the AYP Exposition, whose legacy was the University of Washington campus and more development north of the Ship Canal. The '62 fair gave us a major civic center, a legacy of infrastructure that ephemeral fairs don't always leave behind. The Center Foundation wants to keep this celebration focussed on the center, where fair icons like the Space Needle and Monorail still function. While the city debates the future of the Center, 2012 also is an opportunity for focusing on what the Center has become, and what it can be, and why it deserved public support. It also helps anchor the celebration by being the go-to place for events. The celebration of AYP was necessarily more de-centralized. Still, some aspects of the AYP centennial will be recapitulated. For example, the folks at Historylink are working on a Century 21 book to match the excellent one they produced on AYP. Burley says it is scheduled for publication in the fall of 2011, ahead of the anniversary.

Many cities celebrate their old world's fairs, and indeed, the legacy and memory of fairs has itself become the subject of scholarship. At the 50th anniversary, oral histories of participants and attendees are still possible, though most of the main fair organizers have passed on. But the anthropology of fairs has generated a fascinating literature about memory, ritual, and commemoration that can produce insight into how cities are shaped, or aren't.

A recent work on the subject, "Whose Fair: Experience, Memory and the History of the Great St. Louis Exposition" by James Burkhart Gilbert, is an excellent example of the kind of fascinating look into a city's makeup that can be had by studying a fair and how it is remembered, or not. For example Burkhart notes that whites in St. Louis tended to believe the fair was a signature event in the history of their city, while African Americans did not. And among whites, immigrant groups that had a strong presence at the fair, like the Irish or Germans, carried that sense of connection down through the generations.

It turns out that many people's impressions of the fair were influenced by the gauzy nostalgia for the way of life portrayed in the Judy Garland musical, "Meet Me in St. Louis" (1944), which showed almost nothing of the fair and in fact was more about the cultural climate of boys going off to war in World War II than it was about real life in St. Louis in 1904. In other words, people remembered a fair nostalgically based on the nostalgia of a Hollywood movie made 40 years after the fair. Burkhart also found a certain amount of widely accepted false memory about the fair, or an acceptance of its hype as gospel. Contrary to popular belief, the St. Louis fair did not invent the hot dog, Ferris wheel or ice cream cone, though it helped to popularize all three.


Like what you just read? Support high quality local journalism. Become a member of Crosscut today!

Comments:

Posted Wed, Sep 15, 8:13 a.m. Inappropriate

Two things:

A publication on the preparations for the 1962 worlds Fair. Many capital improvements were accomplished (I-5 for one) to be ready for the Fair. We are now either using or eliminating such improvements. A look at what was the lasting legacy of improvements that have come and gone, and are going.

Hire Paul Dorpat to do one of his famous "Then and Now" publications. It would illustrate the gigantic changes that have ocurred since the Fair.

These two publications could be accomplished by Spring of 2012 and would provide an important perspective for all on what was done,the longevity of things and changing attitudes in the past 50 years.

Posted Wed, Sep 15, 8:15 a.m. Inappropriate

It it wasn't apparent from your "Babyboomer" piece and Crosscut's desperate call for ideas from outside its gerontologist's shop, I am glad to note the honest of today's cris de coeur, Knute!
Short of slaughtering about 50 thousand what I call the "old women of Seattle", both male and female, I see no point in even trying to start freshets of new ideas hereabout. cheerios. http://www.facebook.com/mike.roloff1?ref=name

mikerol

Posted Wed, Sep 15, 9:24 a.m. Inappropriate

"So let's not be shy about asking for ideas from the rest of the world."

It's not that Seattle is "shy", Knute. It's that Seattle is arrogant. Our progressive establishment knows what's best. Period.

BlueLight

Posted Wed, Sep 15, 10:49 a.m. Inappropriate

This piece struck me in particular, seeing as I'm a transplant from St. Louis who grew up constantly hearing about the 'glory days' of the 1904 world's fair. The most important thing about these types of events, whether the fairs' themselves or the anniversary celebrations, is that these are events when a city should really step back and take a good look. This of course includes taking outside advice to critically look at how we function as a city...For the STL, that means understanding that we have fallen from the top, accepting that, and doing our best to reinvent ourselves for the future (which can mean doing things differently than we have for 100's of years).

One of the things I love/hate about Seattle (and the NW in general) is that we blaze our own trail and do things our way...which also means that we sometimes think our way is best without really looking at how the rest of the world operates. We exist in a bubble, so to speak, that both insulates us from following other regions blindly, but also prevents us from seeing other ways of doing things.

I wouldn't give up our independent, creative nature for a second...but we really need to be able to look outside our world and values and see what else works and how we could potentially apply those ideas to our unique environment. Just my .02...

dblarsen

Posted Wed, Sep 15, 11:07 a.m. Inappropriate

What blueLight said.

dman

Posted Wed, Sep 15, 1:28 p.m. Inappropriate

What the 50th Anniversary of the World's Fair represents is a reminder that nothing like it will ever happen again... that the Seattle of the early 21st century, despite its delusions, is a small-minded, provincial backwater that doesn't possess the capability to think of anything beyond what already exists. Let us mourn the passing of the truly progressive city of half a century ago...

orino

Posted Wed, Sep 15, 2:28 p.m. Inappropriate

dblarsen: Good thoughts on the balance between originality and getting outside the bubble.

Also about St. Louis: whereas some fairs have marked major turning points for cities, or a sequence of fairs has had an ongoing, regenerative impact (Paris is an example of this), it has arguably been all downhill for St. Louis since 1904. In other words, the fair represented a high point. Consider this: they hosted a major exposition, the Olympic Games (muscled away from rival Chicago) and the Democratic National Convention all in the same year, and connected to the expo. Of course, 1904 was also Alton B. Parker's high point too, but it's hard to imagine any city doing today what St. Louis did in 1904. They went out with a bang.

Posted Thu, Sep 16, 11:48 a.m. Inappropriate

You might think from some of my postings that I detest Seattle, and you would be wrong. Compared to NY where nothing lasts except its museums and the constant infusion of culture appears to have no effect on the city's being, Seattle and the Northwest's politics at least is not entirely corrupt. Just the odd 100 million caper now and then. Nothing to write home about if you've spent 25 years in New York, and, sort of incidentally, seen just about every height and depths. Seattle has fine birds, green spaces, wonderful raccoons, you can do research here, fairly undistracted, not too much to attract one's worst habits, lovely bus service, great bus drivers, and if you are someone who was affected by the culture he was exposed to, you can bear without in Seattle. So by compare with no ends of places in the U.S.S.R. ... Seattle is pretty nice, except that, inescapably, it is part of the U.S.S.R. which will drag into that normative. Cars, highways, pollution. Alaska at least has a chance to secede!

mikerol

Posted Thu, Sep 16, 3:55 p.m. Inappropriate

"arties4453" writes: "Many capital improvements were accomplished (I-5 for one) to be ready for the Fair."

In 1962, I-5 ended in Tukwila, didn't it? I-5 wasn't completed through Seattle until the mid-60s. What was completed in time for the fair was SR-599, which connects I-5 to then-US-99. But I agree that a book would be a good idea. So far as I know, the only book on the Fair is Murray Morgan's "Century 21".

dbreneman

Posted Thu, Oct 28, 1:17 a.m. Inappropriate

Supra Couples Shoes
http://www.suprashoesok.com/supra-couples-shoes-c-39.html

Login or register to add your voice to the conversation.

Join Crosscut now!
Subscribe to our Newsletter

Follow Us »