Lake Union Park: a first look at its design

The $30 million park opened last weekend, and our critic finds it "simply stunning." It's a vast improvement on the sullen landscape of asphalt and dirt it replaces.

The new Lake Union Park

City of Seattle

The new Lake Union Park

This past Saturday the 12-acre, $30 million Lake Union Park was unveiled to the public with great hoopla and fanfare. Marching bands, vendors, entertainment, warm weather, and a sparkling Lake Union all made for a great event. The new park is simply stunning and will just get better in years to come, with the maturing of trees and the upcoming move of MOHAI, the Museum of History and Industry, into the old Naval Reserve building and other planned additions.

For now, the park opens up a large crescent of public access, arching around the southwest corner of Lake Union. Far more enticing and captivating than earlier efforts to wind trails and diminutive overlooks in between businesses and parking lots, this new park is grand in scale and not disrupted by cars skittering about.

Pre-dating the Naval Reserve armory, the area had been occupied by a sawmill — an industry that spent decades dumping scrap, chips, and sawdust into the lower reaches of the lake. Eventually, dozens of feet of fetid fill could barely support a parking lot for the Naval Reserve; the lot had humps and valleys from the differing rates of settlement and weak load bearing capacity.

A century ago, the Olmsted Brothers landscape architecture firm recommended the area for a park, as part of the network of parks, boulevards, and greenways they planned for Seattle. That vision has been finally realized. The park was designed by the internationally known Hargreaves Associates, based in New York, San Francisco and other cities, along with the locally based Mithun.

$20 million of the total cost was raised by the non-profit Seattle Parks Foundation, headed by the affable and unflappable Karen Daubert.  Vulcan, the Paul-Allen-led development company with many nearby projects, contributed half of the private funds. The remainder of the funding came from public sources, including a voter-approved Pro-Parks Levy. The project was initiated under former Mayor Greg Nickels and former Parks Superintendant Ken Bounds. Thanks to these efforts, a vast stretch of asphalt and dirt has been totally transformed.

Today, there is a smooth plane of grass and granite chips crisscrossed by pathways and lines of trees. Where once were mucky, weedy shallows in the west waterway, there is now habitat for birds and fish. A gracefully-designed pedestrian bridge allows for people to peer down into the lake and observe the growing marine life. A little clump of trees and lawn at the west end of the bridge offers a supremely serene view of water and vegetation with the backdrop of a dynamic, changing skyline.

A wide diagonal walkway framed by arcing water jets denotes the original shoreline of the lake before it was filled. Originally, the design concept called for a canal that would slice across at that angle, but that idea proved infeasible.

A model boat basin anchors the center of the park, resembling similar shallow circular ponds in parks like the Luxembourg Gardens in Paris. Here, as there, small sailboats are gently pushed off on a short course with long bamboo poles by both children and adults. Unexpected gusts of wind suddenly deflect the direction of the little vessels, causing much scurrying about to receive them on the other side.

The wood-planked esplanade lining the northwest corner invites quiet contemplation of the entire panorama of the lake: sailboats and motorboats, sea planes landing and taking off, birds, buildings, houseboats, and a row of historic ships moored off to the side. It's a rich array of commerce, recreation, and maritime heritage.

The west waterway contains a feature unusual if not unique in central Seattle — a place to launch kayaks by hand. A sloping, sandy beach is one means, the other is a slender dock. The beach, although small, should attract contingents of sun-worshippers on nice days, including former Californians like me in occasional desperate search for needed UVA.

As good as the new park is now, there is more to come. Mercer and Valley are about to be transformed into tree-lined streets. Valley will be narrow and quiet (unlike the random whizzing traffic and cacophony today). Mercer will be a divided, two-way boulevard with wide sidewalks and large trees and ornamental street lights. The South Lake Union Streetcar already allows many people to reach the park by transit.

The Center for Wooden Boats is gathering funds to build an education center at the end of the east waterway. The building will showcase the construction of various small watercraft and hold classes and interpretive tours. This will expand upon the small village-like grouping of houseboat-like sheds and boats for rent.

At some point the United Indians of All Tribes will develop its own educational and interpretive center near the west bank of the west waterway. When all these various projects are completed, there will be a whole series of buildings, spaces, and vessels portraying the past as the future unfolds in all directions.

The new Lake Union Park also offers lessons for the upcoming design of the Central Waterfront public spaces. Parks and public spaces do not do well on their own; they need buildings and uses that provide activation. The role of on-going programming is also critical; organizations must monitor and maintain the space as well as manage and promote events. Otherwise parks can fall into disuse or misuse.

The recent rise of mean-spirited, anti-government activists has spread a collective malaise that government does not act in our best interests and that taxpayers are being milked, if not bilked, at every opportunity. Well, Lake Union Park is an example of government not just doing things right, but doing them superbly. Two-thirds of the cost came from private donors, not the taxpaying public. All in all, it’s a pretty good deal.


About the Author

Mark Hinshaw, FAIA, is an architect and urban planner at a Seattle architecture firm. He was an architecture critic for "The Seattle Times" and is the author of many articles and books, including "Citistate Seattle" (1999). He can be reached at editor@crosscut.com.

Comments:

Posted Tue, Sep 28, 9:03 a.m. Inappropriate

Show me the places to simply sit. I miss the tables and chairs.

noahveil

Posted Tue, Sep 28, 11:19 a.m. Inappropriate

Huh? What an odd last paragraph. It seems to have been written by someone other than the author of the article and just tacked on.

Posted Tue, Sep 28, 12:53 p.m. Inappropriate

How did this wind up costing $30 million?

sean98125

Posted Tue, Sep 28, 5:04 p.m. Inappropriate

I appreciated the last paragraph of the piece as it is important that projects such as this are not overly expensive. However, I question how much the author actually cares about the cost of park projects when he says, "as good as the park is now, there is more to come. Mercer and Valley are about to be transformed into tree-lined streets." The Mercer street project is almost entirely a beautification project as it will cost $161 million (though this also has some non taxpayer funding sources). Thus it is hypocritical for the author to claim he cares about costs and at the same time claim that this project will make things better.

It should also be noted that, along with the S.L.U.S, you can also reach the park by transit using metro routes 17, 30, or 70.

Posted Tue, Sep 28, 7:34 p.m. Inappropriate

I admit to not having yet spent the necessary time there to know whether Hinshaw's judgement of the new park is justified or not. I do hope its as good as he says it is. But unfortunately the article doesn't mention how come the financing for the park was done with 2/3 non-taxpayer monies. Twice Allen and his fellows tried to get the park built from the public purse as the 'Commons' and twice they were turned down by the voters. I would see this article making the case that the voters were quite right. From the beginning, the park was not envisioned as a true commons, but rather an amenity with which the developers of S Lake Union could attract tenants and other investors. They needed some open space to pull off their larger game plan, and a park seemed a fine idea. Its still a fine idea. But it is and was a product of the development needs of the development- without the density proposed for the area, there was no need for a park. Now the developer has brought the density to S Lake Union, and now he has paid a big part of the cost of the park that gives the buildings necessary breathing room.

Most unfortunately, the public is paying for all of the 'beautification' of Mercer which is another perk that Allen and Co. believed necessary to shine up their development. As has been very well documented by SDOT and others, the re-do of Mercer, though taking very needed funds from real transportation problems elsewhere in the city, will not improve the traffic flow in that area at all. Hinshaw knows all this history. Its sad to this reader that he suggests that this park is a model for other projects. The real model would have been if Allen Etc. had built the park with their private money in the first place. That would have been a real civic gift, in a most gracious way, and a real model for the future.

thoughts

Posted Tue, Sep 28, 10:25 p.m. Inappropriate

Hinshaw's piece is solid. I enjoy the park from both land and water via a dory. It will get better.

In 1969, I walked by the lake to my busboy job at Kim's Broiler. We are growing.

One sentence is incomplete: "The South Lake Union Streetcar already allows many people to reach the park by transit. The Seattle Streetcar is a 1.3-mile distraction. The park is also served by routes 17, 26, 28, 30, and 70, all of which provide more transit advantage by offering longer trips to more places. Route 70 is more frequent than the streetcar and connects to the U District, Eastlake, and downtown; routes 26-28 also provide 15-minute headway between Fremont and Georgetown; from downtown, one may take routes 17, 26-28, and 70 to the park from the same 3rd Avenue stops, a combined 10 trips per midday hour.

eddiew

Posted Wed, Sep 29, 8:49 p.m. Inappropriate

This park provides a much needed oasis of green along an otherwise gray, inaccessible shoreline. One minor correction. The park's bridge spans a freshwater lake, providing park users with a fabulous view of aquatic life beneath, rather than marine life which is typically found within all the salty water of this region. Thanks for the fine park review.

Posted Fri, Oct 1, 10:36 a.m. Inappropriate

Took a walk through the new park yesterday and was impressed with the layout, but like previous posters, amazed at the lack of seating. Because you cannot sit on the grass (can't walk on it yet because its new and fenced off) but also because the geese have polluted it. There are parts of the sidewalk on the Westlake side that are almost completely covered with goose poop. It won't be long before people stop using it because of that problem.

2catsmom

Posted Fri, Oct 1, 1:58 p.m. Inappropriate

The beach and hand launching facilities are nice but I'd also like a small dock to tie my rowboat to so my crew can use the bathroom. And so that we can stop and picnic here.

GaryP

Posted Fri, Oct 1, 7:34 p.m. Inappropriate

This park could have been done 15 years ago had not the misguided, eminent domain, condemnation, evil plan called the 'Seattle Commons' so captured the feeble minds of Seattle's elite. Thanks to all commons opponents, Seattle gets proper, market based development and a new park; it was worth the wait after the glorious election victories over the pooh-bahs back in November, 1995, and May, 1996.

animalal

Posted Thu, Oct 28, 1:16 a.m. Inappropriate

thanks for your sharing,it is a good story.
Supra Couples Shoes

Login or register to add your voice to the conversation.

Join Crosscut now!
Subscribe to our Newsletter

Follow Us »