A president in the neighbor's backyard

The White House was looking for a middle-class family to host the president.

President Obama campaigns for Sen. Patty Murray during an October 2010 stop at the University of Washington.

Cathy Copeland

President Obama campaigns for Sen. Patty Murray during an October 2010 stop at the University of Washington.

When I called my friends Erik and Cynnie Foss to inform them they might be chosen for a Presidential visit, we were all sure it was a real long shot. The White House wanted to find a middle class Seattle family to host the president and have a discussion about the economy and the impact it is having on women and families.

The Foss house seemed perfect so I asked Erik if it would be OK. There was a long silence on the line and finally acquiescence — driven by his wife Cynnie. We hung up the phone knowing that it would likely never happen.

Two days later, Erik called me and said there were a bunch of people in suits in his living room and a helicopter overhead, and my wife, Julianna, and I should probably take Thursday off.

Watching Cynnie and Erik walk out of their house with the president of the United States was an incredible sight. And yet, President Obama seemed so at ease and comfortable with the surroundings, it almost felt like he was just dropping by.

The conversation that followed showed him to be extremely well versed in economics, healthcare, education reform, the media, and politics. Full disclosure: I voted for Obama and walked precincts for him and will do it again. I happened to hear about the White House's interest in a middle-class family at a party, where it was mentioned by a local political consultant.

When I had a chance to ask a question of the president on Thursday, I wanted to know his thoughts on the current state of our public debate during the election and moving forward. I wanted to ask him how he intended to address the distortions and sometimes outright lies about him personally and his policies such as the Recovery Act, healthcare reform, student loans, and the Bush tax cuts. I was concerned that the media is abdicating its watchdog role for the truth and instead becoming obsessed with the horserace, polling, and money.

I was impressed with his response. He described very clearly the situation that he and his team faced when they took office. They had to act quickly on a number of policy fronts and didn’t pay much attention to the public relations or spin piece of the pie. They really wanted to get the policy right. He also talked about the specific reforms in the average person’s health care that will begin to be known, which will lead to long term support of the policy. For instance, health insurance companies can’t drop you because of pre-existing conditions, or because paperwork wasn’t filled out right. Small businesses will be able to buy insurance for their employees through exchanges that will reduce cost.

On the student aid front, getting the banks out of the equation saves the government money so more kids can go to college and interest rates will be reduced at the same time. Who could be against that? Particularly since these have always been taxpayer-insured loans anyway.

He talked about the components of the Recovery Act, saving teachers jobs by helping cash strapped states, investing in infrastructure (like the South Park Bridge), providing tax cuts to small businesses, and investing in energy efficiency. Plenty of Republican senators and representatives talk locally about the need for these projects but attack the plan on the national stage. It’s as if they have forgotten how big a ditch we have just climbed out of.

In my view, he was far too easy on the media. As citizens we should demand more from our media. Sitting in the Foss backyard, we discussed the issues that touch us all, whether or not we can afford college for our kids, will my family have health care if I lose my job, or what happens if I can’t make my mortgage payment. These are the issues that need to be discussed and debated.

And even though I haven’t heard any specific ideas from the current crop of Republican challengers this year, I’m sure they have something to offer too. But let’s see it.

Rossi’s economic plan is basically about cutting spending and taxes. Fair enough. But what do he or other Republicans want to cut? If you don’t give specifics or at least raise some questions, you really don’t have a plan. And the media should stop calling it a plan and ask for some specific answers.

Whether you agree with him or not, Obama has a plan and has a policy wonk’s grasp of the details. He's taking the long view, willing to brave some rough weather in order to get to a place where the American economy moves into high gear again.

There were no scripted questions, no questions about party loyalty or ideology. Just a conversation about issues that we middle-class families worry about every day. We want smart people who are serious about helping make a stronger America. We really don’t care if someone is a witch or not. And we deserve and should start demanding that our media give us the facts and data that we need to make informed decisions about candidates and issues.

I hope that the 25 of us who were lucky enough to have this conversation with our president this cold October morning will carry this message forward and ask more of ourselves and our public dialogue.

The Foss home is back to normal now. But sitting in the backyard sipping a beer in the summertime will always seem a little more special.


About the Author

Jordan Royer currently works for the Pacific Merchant Shipping Association, which represents marine terminal operators and container vessels that serve the West Coast. He previously worked on public safety issues in the Paul Schell and Greg Nickels mayoral administrations. He was a candidate for Seattle City Council in 2009. You can reach him in care of editor@crosscut.com.

Like what you just read? Support high quality local journalism. Become a member of Crosscut today!

Comments:

Posted Fri, Oct 22, 9 a.m. Inappropriate

A politician must always walk a fine line when talking about the media. Some get better coverage than others for a variety of reasons, but criticizing the press almost always degrades the quality of the coverage one receives. Ask Richard Nixon about that.

Posted Fri, Oct 22, 2:25 p.m. Inappropriate

This could be an interesting piece with the author's firsthand behind-the-scenes insight into a Presidential visit. Unfortunately, the author gets tripped up by his own partisan hypocrisy, decrying the partisanship and distortion that is by it's nature generated by our own commercial, sound bit political culture, and then going on to attack the Republicans.

News flash - for any objective person in the region who has watched TV at any length during this election cycle, it's quite evident that both sides - Republicans and Democrats, Obama supporters and Obama opponents - are guilty of distortion and disengenuity in their spin of the opposing side's record and views.

Posted Fri, Oct 22, 2:59 p.m. Inappropriate

Very nice piece, Jordan.

Dad

croyer1

Posted Fri, Oct 22, 5:26 p.m. Inappropriate

Nice to hear an account from someone who was THERE! I bet it will be the talk of the neighborhood for years!

How did the White House come to contact you when looking for a house to visit?

Suich

suich

Posted Fri, Oct 22, 7:51 p.m. Inappropriate

Jordan,
Though I am an admirer I am disappointed. You missed your opportunity to lure the President into an endorsement of Crosscut. How about: "Mr. President, Crosscut is the leading website for informed civil discourse on Seattle regional politics and public affairs. Would you say Crosscut is a cause worth supporting?" Then the President says, "I like what I hear about Crosscut." Man, that's worth gold.

Posted Sat, Oct 23, 12:08 p.m. Inappropriate

Crosscut publishes many pieces that are not even-handed in their assessments of the Democrats and the Republicans. But this isn't political analysis; it's a story about an event. Mr. Royer makes it clear in the article that he's a Democrat and worked for Obama's election. Surely no one could claim to be unaware of his political position, so the phrase "partisan hypocrisy" is inappropriate.

Good article. Keep writing, Jordan; your other more politically-oriented articles were very good also.

sarah

Posted Sun, Oct 24, 7:28 a.m. Inappropriate

"The conversation that followed showed him to be extremely well versed in economics, healthcare, education reform, the media, and politics."

I'll grant that the president is well-versed in healthcare, education reform, the media, and politics. But economics? He's done nothing to indicate any grasp of that subject.

He persists in announcing a targeted project-of-the-week aimed at this or that narrow business sector, but seems blind to the fact that what businesses in the US, and those overseas who trade with the US, crave is a stable regulatory environment above all else. With government constantly moving the proverbial goalposts and re-tilting the allegorical playing field, businesses can't plan for the future and therefore are simply waiting this out. In this manner, he's repeating exactly the kind of "fiddling while the economy burns" that FDR used to quash the nascent recovery of 1932 and turn it into another seven years of depression. Rather than addressing a salient issue like this, the author chose instead to lob a softball at Obama that Larry King would be proud of.

Sorry to rain on the barbecue. I'm willing to give the man credit where it's due, but as an economist he's a failure.

dbreneman

Login or register to add your voice to the conversation.

Join Crosscut now!
Subscribe to our Newsletter

Follow Us »