A lesson in why early voting could bite the voter

Bad fantasy: You voted early. Then everything changed, including your mind. Sorry. Too late.

Washington state ballot (2010).

Bob Simmons

Washington state ballot (2010).

There's probably a lot to be said for voting early. A good number of voters seem to think so. By the weekend, many among us will have already secured the blessings of liberty by mailing in their ballots. In Washington state, early voters may in turn be spared further telephone harassment by the likes of Pat Boone, whose robotic voice has called our home three times today from somewhere beyond the geriatric ward, urging us to support Dino Rossi.  No small reward, being taken off Pat Boone’s call list in return for voting early.

But think of this. What if you have just voted for a U.S. Senate candidate and mailed the ballot, then you read the newspaper and, suddenly, you are wild to have your ballot back, that you might use it to light the barbecue.

Let’s just speculate, here: You take part in a vote-by-mail system like the one Washington voters use (except for those in Pierce County); your ballot arrives October 13.  You make the appropriate marks and send it off in the afternoon mail.

Beginning soon after, the following things happen:

Oct. 17: Your candidate’s hired security squad detains and handcuffs a reporter for accosting the candidate with questions about his performance as a part-time attorney for a small municipality. (He has earlier declared that he will no longer tolerate questions concerning his past employment).

Oct. 18: Your candidate defends the citizen’s arrest, claiming the reporter shoved someone. Police find no witnesses to any shove, nor to any other activity that would warrant a citizen’s arrest on public property. Military authorities confirm that the guards making the arrest were active-duty soldiers. U.S. military are not allowed to arrest American civilians.

Oct. 19: Denouncing the media for prying into his personal affairs, your candidate acknowledges on national television that he was disciplined by his former employer for improper use of the city’s computers as part of his campaign to oust the chair of the state’s Republican Party.

Oct. 20: A coalition of news organizations files a lawsuit demanding release of documents concerning the computer use for which your candidate was disciplined.

Oct. 20: The head of the security detail who arrested the pushy reporter is said to be allied to a state militia movement (this may actually be a boost for your candidate, or as close as it gets this month).

Oct 23: His former boss, the ex-mayor, says your candidate did indeed use city computers for political work, in violation of the municipality’s ethics code.

Oct. 24:  A judge orders the release of many of the candidate’s personnel records.

Oct. 27:  News media publish excerpts; the largest newspaper in the state reports that while he was working as municipal attorney your candidate secretly entered three of his co-workers’ computers, as part of his failed assault on the party boss. He also cleared his colleagues’ computer caches to erase his tracks, and in the process cleared out their passwords and their saved websites. His actions may have damaged a property tax case they were working on, in which a great deal of money was at stake.

Your candidate is found to have sent the following e-mail to a colleague: "I lied about accessing all of the computers. Then I admitted about accessing the computers, but lied about what I was doing. Finally, I admitted what I did."

OK, relax. If you live in Washington, you didn’t vote for this guy.

This was Alaska, a place as rich in bizarre politics as it is in moose and mountains. Tea Party Republican Joe Miller, he of the lying, the unauthorized computer entry, and the reporter handcuffing, is running neck and neck with write-in candidate and current U.S. Sen. Lisa Murkowski, with Democrat Scott McAdams moving up.

Fortunately for Alaskans, they elect their officeholders under the quaint old system in which most citizens don’t vote until election day.  Then they go to the polls and mark a ballot, live and in person, all on the same day.  It is possible to vote early, in person, at government offices in six locations around the state, or to apply for a mail-in absentee ballot.

But as of Wednesday (Oct. 27) only a small fraction of Alaskans had done either one.  The large majority of the state’s 494,876 registered voters will wait until election day, think it over, and follow the further excellent adventures of Joe Miller.

If there’s a cautionary point to this tale it would seem to be: Hang on to your ballot for as long as you can, until you absolutely know what your candidate is made of.


About the Author

Bob Simmons is a freelance writer and former KING-TV journalist living in Bellingham, Wash. You can reach him in care of editor@crosscut.com.

Like what you just read? Support high quality local journalism. Become a member of Crosscut today!

Comments:

Posted Thu, Oct 28, 8:39 a.m. Inappropriate

So your recommendation is that no one should lick the stamp until the late hours of the final day, and do a careful check of all media before driving to the Lander St. mailbox just before midnight?

There's no guarantee that a "This just in..." revelation will cause regret, but in the scheme of things this has to be a very small, and reasonably acceptable, risk.

Sent my ballot yesterday (10/27) in haste...now I will hold my breath and, should late-breaking news of candidate misbehavior emerge, regret at leisure.

Seneca

Posted Thu, Oct 28, 9:51 a.m. Inappropriate

The vast majority of need-to-know information doesn't come out till after the election (like, for example, the budget crisis we didn't have until after returning Christine to office).

BlueLight

Posted Thu, Oct 28, 10:19 a.m. Inappropriate

Indeed. Can we ever absolutely know what our candidates are made of? Besides which, even though there are still those who vote for the candidate, not the party, there seem to be many more who vote the party line. How many Murray supporters would really switch their vote to Rossi if she'd acted like Joe Miller, or vice versa?

Posted Thu, Oct 28, 11:51 a.m. Inappropriate

Universal absentee voting is a bad idea, period. I'm very glad to live in Pierce County where I can and do vote at a polling place, on election day, with all the facts at my disposal, and with my neighbors. But for the vast majority of Washingtonians, the phrase "Election Day" is a quaint term from a bygone era, right up there with "phonograph record" and "phone booth." Deprived of election day, they fill out their ballots, drop them in the mail, and hope they get counted, with all the solemnity of process reserved for sending in a rebate form for a gallon of paint. This state needs to reinstitute election day, so that all voters can make their decisions with all the facts and the races can come to a close all at the same time. Sometimes convenience is a bad thing.

dbreneman

Posted Thu, Oct 28, 4:17 p.m. Inappropriate

It can happen. I don't really want to change my vote on the liquor stores but it sounds like they should stay to me. But than I was a bit "amused" to find it probably wasn't MADD pushing for it but the brewery owners so they wouldn't loose any shelf space. You never know who is pushing for what. Fascinating system we have.

Posted Thu, Oct 28, 7:28 p.m. Inappropriate

I used to get an absentee ballot even if I was going to be home, and I've lived in Oregon in spurts of one or two years. I can honestly say the scenario you describe has never happened to me. Quite honestly, election campaigns have become so long and so tedious, I want to mark the ballot and drop it, so I don't have to deal with it anymore. I like how election campaigns in Canada and the U.K. are eight weeks. Enough time to digest the facts, but not so much that one gets sick of the whole thing. Which is what I think the politicos have in mind...

orino

Posted Fri, Oct 29, 7:32 a.m. Inappropriate

Another downside to all-mail balloting is the loss of voter privacy.

In a multi-voter household, the dominant individual can making voting a group activity. Voters who may not agree with mom or dad's decisions don't have the privacy to vote their own decisions with someone else inspecting the ballot before it goes in the envelope. This one occasion when I actually agree with dbreneman.

Posted Fri, Oct 29, 4:17 p.m. Inappropriate

You do not mention it but those conservatives who voted against State Sen. Jean Berkey
apparently because of a flash campaign that was financed by liberal democrats and labor unions would probably like to have their vote back also. Someone should do some jail time on that one and I hope they do.

kieth

Posted Mon, Nov 1, 1:05 p.m. Inappropriate

One thing about voting early. I put my ballot in the mail over ten days ago. I used the mailbox in the local post office.

King County elections has a "track your ballot" feature. As of today (November 1), there is no record that it has been received. I'm going to have to go to the elections office and vote in person.

Maybe I'm in one of those piles of uncounted ballots. Like the ones they pulled out in 2004, when they had, what two or three recounts until they found one that was "fair" (read, favored a Democratic candidate).

Login or register to add your voice to the conversation.

Join Crosscut now!
Subscribe to our Newsletter

Follow Us »