Seattle's live-work spaces: Commuting is such a breeze
The AIA Seattle Honor Awards show innovations in use of cramped city lots and thoughtful combinations of places to live and work. One architect talks about "going back to the natural zoning of cities."
Courtesy of Graham Baba Architects
Courtesy of Graham Baba Architects
Courtesy of Olson Kundig Architects
Courtesy of Olson Kundig Architects
As Seattle densifies and expensifies, fresh ideas in housing are breaking out. They have to; the traditional single-family city home is looking as endangered as neighborhood drugstores and street parking.
We've seen one solution and it ain’t pretty: the dismal neo-craftsman clusterplexes breaking out like a pox around Stone Avenue and North 85th Street. High-rise condo living, another option, has its attributes, but it's a radical shift away from the intimate neighborhood culture of this city.
An interesting trend, though, may be poking out of the annual AIA Seattle Honor Awards announced last week. Several of the winners are small-scaled residential projects using cramped city lots and innovative combinations of living, working, or income-producing rentals.
Taken together, they suggest that the 20th-century model of compartmentalizing and segregating the various facets of city life is an idea whose time has gone. It's almost a reversion to the urban fabric of the 18th century.
"It's going back to the natural zoning of cities," says Jim Graham of Graham Baba Architects. "The shopkeeper lives over the shop. It brings 24/7 life to the neighborhood. And he doesn't have to commute anywhere by car."
Graham Baba's "Building 115" in Fremont won merely a third-level "commendation" in the AIA award lineup, but it may be the most interesting of all the winning projects.
First, it's an amazing squeeze job. On a 30-by-90-foot lot, Graham has layered a 900-square-foot retail space (currently occupied by a custom bike shop), a rental office space soon to be claimed by a design firm, an office for the owner’s construction business, and 800 square feet of penthouse living for the owner.
Actually, the living space is essentially 2,000 square feet, but most of that is in the form of a wraparound third-story deck, with folding glass NanaWall systems throwing open the living room and bedroom to the outdoors. The lot's industrial zoning limits residential space to an 800-square-foot "caretaker's unit," so the generous deck is a way of satisfying a silly regulation. The deck provides great views of passing traffic on the Ship Canal, though its all-season usefulness is debatable.
The building's street presence (115 36th St. N.) is delightful, especially at night. Most of the facade is composed of vertical strips of Channel Glass, panels 2 inches thick and filled with translucent gel for good thermal insulation. From the outside it becomes a lantern at night; inside, soft northern light suffuses the second-story office with gentle warmth. The window treatment is an assortment of slots, slits, indented nips and outreaching bays. It offers enough sizzle to look busy, as it should on a commercial street, but it doesn't slip into willful Fremont perversity. Good middle-ground judgment.
It's obviously built to an "aggressive" budget, as Graham terms it, with plain concrete block common walls on the sides and raw concrete ceilings inside. In places, frankly, it feels pretty austere; the warmth of the light doesn't entirely cancel the cold of the concrete and steel. But the concept points the way toward innovative small-scale urban development. What could be better than wrapping living, work, and income-producing rentals in one package?
Olson Kundig Architects' Art Stable at 516 Yale Ave. North (a few blocks north of REI's flagship store) is built to a different scale and very different price point. Its six residences, ranging from 1,900 to 4,000 square feet, are being sold at $500 to $800 per square foot — an eyebrow-raising entry fee for a recession. But four have already been sold, so it's apparent that architect Tom Kundig and developer Point32 have something figured out.
This is another tall (seven floors), skinny (42 feet) urban infill project, but the developer made a canny investment in buying air rights to the 20-foot-wide slot between the Art Stable and the larger apartment building on its north flank. Kundig then designed its structural system around beefy interior columns, so that the north wall doesn't have to hold anything up.
Consequently, each buyer can order any kind of window configuration on that wall, in addition to the generous glass on the Yale Avenue side and the double-wide alley in back. That makes for an unusual amount of interior daylighting, and a bit of idiosyncrasy on at least one face of the building.
Well, make that two — no Kundig project bursts into being without some Tomfoolery. The front doors are 14 feet high and painted with oven-baked chartreuse and orange car enamel. An 8-inch pipe rockets vertically up the facade, forming a giant hinge for huge 9-by-9 foot windows on each floor, opened from inside with crank wheel and worm gear. Kundig is a gearhead; he loves architecture with wheels and transmissions. On the alley, a similar arrangement with a crane stationed permanently on the roof is intended to allow furniture and art to arrive and leave through the windows.
Point32 partner Chris Rogers says the building has been marketed as a live-work environment for artists, even though the typical artist might better be able to afford a $700-a-month warehouse loft in Tacoma. Still, he says two of the four buyers so far are working artists.
Probably more significant is that the building is flexible enough to welcome a wide range of future uses if the South Lake Union neighborhood changes again. It could just as easily be offices, gallery space, or retail.
And there's the challenge for architects and developers in a rapidly changing, tightening Seattle: to make buildings that adapt readily to a changing economy and society, and yet exude character and style that says something about Seattle. Usually these objectives nullify each other. These buildings show that they don't have to.
Like what you just read? Support high quality local journalism. Become a member of Crosscut today!











Twitter
Facebook
RSS Feeds
Comments:
Posted Thu, Nov 18, 8:12 a.m. Inappropriate
Just back from Paris, where one of the greatest charms of the city is that the grand old buildings are multi-use. Lots of small manufacturing at street level and in the interior courtyards; workshops and boutiques side-by-side; professional offices (doctors, lawyers, architects) upstairs, indicated by bronze plaques next to the entry keypads. A tiny grocery squeezed into a doorway, a cafe or two at the corner, of course. This approach puts swarms of people on the street at all hours, people of all ethnicities and income levels, creating a lively diversity that cities like Seattle lack.
Posted Thu, Nov 18, 1:10 p.m. Inappropriate
I like Paris, too, and it may have a little bit of small scale manufacturing here and there, but I think real estate prices have driven most industrial jobs out to the suburbs. That is certainly what happened to their famous and gritty wholesele food market that has been repalced by a shopping mall.
Seattle, fortunately, has figured out that allowing residential development in industrial areas would be a death knell for it's substantial industrial base. Far from silly, that is zoning that means something.
I also like what I am seeing in the way of live-work experiments in Seattle. Most seem aimed at the high end of the market, but some seem more modest, like the little cluster at 25th and Union. It won't win any design awards, but it just might work for regular folks who don't pull down a six-figure income.
Posted Thu, Nov 18, 2:12 p.m. Inappropriate
Great review. I love the live-work idea, and it makes sense for people like me (writers) who work from home. But most people have real jobs somewhere else and our economic system and policies do not encouraged self-employment or self sufficiency, let alone small business. If we had economic policies that really encouraged self-sufficiency (as opposed to drone work), these things could really flourish. The Graham Baba project seems very creative and encouraging and thoroughly in keeping with the spirit of those original bungalow villages that have been widely imitated: people need to be able to do for themselves and rely less on the corporate structure. That's what the Arts and Crafts movement, for one, was all about. Doing it affordably is also crucial.
Posted Thu, Nov 18, 11:15 p.m. Inappropriate
I agree in principle with MarkSJ when he supports the need to keep a substantial industrial base in Seattle, but this section of Fremont just isn't a part of that base. It's an eclectic mix of commercial, retail, and some old residential uses.
The same zoning code we use correctly to preserve industrial uses in SODO probably doesn't work very well in neighborhoods like this one. Mr. Cheek's knock on the city's residential restrictions here is well placed. SODO this ain't
Posted Sat, Nov 20, 11:45 a.m. Inappropriate
I think to some extent we're talking about protecting commercial-industrial land from the aggression of an out-of-control housing market. If the housing market can support high prices with real value, as, for example, the housing market on Manhattan does, maybe industry should move- we are, after all, not talking about the diamond market in Rotterdam or the watchmakers of Zurich when we discuss many of our industries.
When housing speculation gets crosswise with existing industries, though, that's a different matter, and the burden of proving that housing won't mess up a functional existing should rest firmly on the housing developer, and be a very heavy burden.
Architects love to do live-work spaces- doctors, not so much.
Login or register to add your voice to the conversation.