Our Sponsors:

Read more »

Trending Stories

Our Members

Many thanks to Andrew Elston and Jack Foy some of our many supporters.


Most Commented


    Heritage Turkeys of the Year

    The worst developments in Northwest heritage and historic preservation for 2010.

    Boeing Plant 2: Permits for its demolition have been approved.

    Boeing Plant 2: Permits for its demolition have been approved. Washington state Department of Ecology

    A year ago, we published the first Heritage Turkey Awards. Now it's time for a look at a sampling of this past year's preservation fiascos, scary trends, and unnecessary demolitions. The list is hardly comprehensive, though I have broadened the scope to include non-preservation heritage issues. Nor do I highlight success stories (and there were some). It does give an idea of the kinds of heritage challenges the region faces, especially in light of tough economic times.

    The war on heritage

    Winner: Proposed budget of Gov. Chris Gregoire

    I was going to leave budget-cutters off this year's list because everyone's been slashing heritage programs, from President Barack Obama on down to your local mayor or city council. But Washington Gov. Chris Gregoire becomes the new poster child for the war on heritage. Her latest budget for the 2011-13 biennium makes a lot of tough choices, but it also makes some really bad ones. Notably, subsuming the state Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation into the Department of Natural Resources, an agency whose mission is, essentially, to grow and cut trees. It makes a strange new home for the urban-renewing Main Street program, and a demotion for the state's single most important heritage agency. Gregoire's budget also proposes to shut down the state's public history museums in Tacoma, Spokane, and Olympia.

    It gets worse. Gregoire has suspended Heritage Capital Projects funding, slashing $10 million in grants around the state. She also cuts programs for restoring historic barns and county courthouses and eliminates out-reach programs for local historical societies. To add insult, her budget includes $6.3 million to demolish an historic building. The General Administration Building is a National Register structure on the Capitol campus, and money for its demolition could be used to fund at least some restoration projects during the current crisis. However the governor argues that the aging GA building is a money pit.

    The GA demolition clears the way for something new, and oft proposed, which is the not-yet-fully-unfunded scheme to build a new state Heritage Center proposed by the Secretary of State's office. This center would bring together the state library, expanded state archives, and new state worker offices, and create exhibit space and a "welcome center" at the Capitol. The cost of the new facility is estimated at between $100 million and $140 million. Many heritage advocates believe the Heritage Center is an expensive boondoggle that should not come at the cost of destroying an historic structure, much less be contemplated when we're closing the museums we already have.

    All in all, Gregoire's proposals are of historically bad proportions for Washington heritage.

    Recipe for Ignorance

    Winner: The Seattle Times

    One would think in a time of difficulty, a newspaper occupying an historic landmark building and with a strong sense of its own past would sound the drum for heritage. But the Seattle Times editorial board is an enthusiastic proponent of downsizing government, not raising taxes, keeping its own tax breaks, and letting heritage be damned. In a recent editorial praising Gregoire's draconian cuts, the newspaper questioned the need for history museums, listing them as "nice but not necessary." Not necessary? Does the Times think closing The Burke Museum or the Henry Gallery at the UW would also be a good idea? For more than a century the state has helped to fund the Washington State Historical Society as a basic function of government. It even received additional government support during the Great Depression when public investment in heritage (via the WPA) was rightly seen as part of the solution to the nation's problems, not part of its cause. We still benefit from that legacy today. 

    Is history now moot? Is the state's commitment to heritage (enshrined in law by legislative declaration) null and void? Are we to quietly accept cuts to schools, teachers, libraries, and heritage institutions that are the bedrock of public history as being essential to the "reset" of government services? The notion that museums are "nice but not necessary" is a recipe for promoting ignorance. Let's hope the legislature sees it differently.

    Like what you just read? Support high quality local journalism. Become a member of Crosscut today!


    Posted Tue, Jan 4, 6:42 a.m. Inappropriate

    First of all,,, Start by cutting the Dept of Ecology, they should enforce the Stormwater pollution laws, Period,,,, not perpetuate the bureaucracy hiring full time finger pointers.

    If DOE enforced the laws, businesses could spend their hard earned dollars on fixing their pollution problem, instead, businesses have to pay DOE a fee, allowing them to pollute.

    Businesses that HAD solutions to prevent stormwater pollution could not compete with Dept of Ecology's intervention and stormwater pollution monopoly. These businesses that manufactured pollution solutions to prevent stormwater pollution were stymied by Dept of Ecology's process. Process of finger pointing.

    Fire all of them and start over without the extortion and conspiracy of the Department of Ecology. We don't need a fox watching the hen house or the cart pulling the horse any longer,

    and create some real jobs, that pay taxes, and create a benefit to taxpayers. Puget Sound hasn't benefited as much as the bureaucracy.


    sus·tain·able adj Definition of SUSTAINABLE
    1: capable of being sustained
    2a : of, relating to, or being a method of harvesting or using a resource so that the resource is not depleted or permanently damaged

    what an oxymoron, Sustainable Department of Ecology

    and they are in charge of our environment

    any wonder why we are in this mess?

    This same logic can be applied at the counties and cities around Puget Sound strapped for cash that have wasted our resources on bureaucracy.


    Posted Tue, Jan 4, 8:02 a.m. Inappropriate

    There is still a slight chance that the Boeing's Plant 2 demolition will have to comply with the National Historic Preservation Act Section 106 review.
    Please write Boeing and tell them you want the Plant 2 demolition stayed.


    Posted Tue, Jan 4, 9:57 a.m. Inappropriate

    There is plenty of waste in Washington government, but the issue is not addressed by closing down libraries, parks and museums. These are core services of government and amount to a pittance in the budget when compared to the lavish benefits packages that the government's ruling elite, the public employees' unions, collect in exchange for their votes. Public service should be a calling, not a ticket to ride the gravy train. If there aren't enough people willing to work in the public sector for a fair wage and benefit package, it's just another indication that government is too big for society's good.


    Posted Tue, Jan 4, 11:01 a.m. Inappropriate

    I'm afraid I seem to be missing the point. I thought I believed in historic preservation until I read this article. Do we have to keep everything? When we had a S Park Bridge, I drove by Plant #2 every day on my way to work. I can't understand why future development needs to be constrained by having to recreate a set of outmoded buildings that have no architectural value. What an eyesore: it's reassuring to know that it'll be gone soon.

    That said, we live in a city ('The Land of Eternal Debate") where we can argue over the beauty of an ugly Denny's, so why not this ugly set of buildings too!


    Posted Wed, Jan 5, 6:33 a.m. Inappropriate

    I don't have your background to declare who should win an award and who shouldn't, but one sad thing I learned this year is that the Washington Trust for Historic Preservation is willing to take on private property owners, but not the government. It was a sad revelation. Especially in light of the governor's budget, it's clear some organization should be advocating for historic preservation to the state. http://walterneary.blogspot.com/2010/06/failing-history-endangered-trust-in.html with a nice followup column by Peter Callaghan of The News Tribune at http://www.thenewstribune.com/2010/08/15/1301977/current-patients-needs-at-western.html


    Login or register to add your voice to the conversation.

    Join Crosscut now!
    Subscribe to our Newsletter

    Follow Us »