Can scare tactics sell the state on mental health funding?

A healthcare union framed its appeal to the legislature with scary stereotypes of mental illness. Mental health advocates called the approach stigmatizing and self-defeating.

A recent "Stranger" cover mentioned mental health, invoking fear.

A recent "Stranger" cover mentioned mental health, invoking fear.

The cover of "Don't Look Away"

SEIU Healthcare Union #1199NW

The cover of "Don't Look Away"

Early in December, the state's SEIU Healthcare union delivered a report to the legislature predicting the tragic impact of cuts to mental health care services. The cover imagery of “Don’t Look Away” was literally ripped from the headlines of news stories about murders committed by people with mental illnesses.

The not-so-subtle message was, “Don’t Look Away or you might be killed,” said Jennifer Stuber at the UW’s Washington State Coalition to Improve Mental Health Reporting. The coalition sent union officials a letter of concern about the report, signed by nearly 300 Washington mental health professionals, advocates, and clients. Stuber, a UW assistant professor of social work, said, “I think it’s really important to change the discourse within the mental health community and model what we’re hoping journalists will do. There are other effective ways to argue why these services are important.”

Jonathan Rosenblum, assistant to the president of SEIU Healthcare 1199NW, told me the report had to be dramatic because “a more subtle appeal won’t work. The budget is too tight.” The cover “is a way of getting people to read the inside. We were very clear, and it’s right there in the summary, and it’s a well-known fact, that most people with mental illnesses are peaceful, functioning members of the community.”

As for the stories referenced in the cover imagery, he said, “The root cause was the failure of the system. These are not merely random acts of violence. They happen because our programs … are underfunded.”

But Amnon Shoenfeld, who directs King County’s mental health services division, said that “the cover is incendiary and makes the public afraid of people with mental illnesses. Funding for treatment should be provided [not because citizens are afraid but] because treating people’s illnesses is the right thing to do.”

Stuber worries that instead of strengthening political will to fund mental health care, the report weakens it. Associating mental illness with violent behavior creates “a huge barrier to funding services adequately. Why would people want to spend money” on a group presented so unfavorably? She said her larger concern is about the long-term consequences of stigma aroused by the report, especially when reinforced by prevailing media images of mental illness. Stigma "sets up barriers to housing, jobs, forming relationships — it really sets people back. And individuals who are ill won't seek help because they don't want to be considered one of 'those' people."

Providers of mental-health services who signed Stuber’s letter prefaced their remarks to me with praise for SEIU Healthcare’s perennial efforts to secure enlightened care for people with mental illnesses. But John Masterson, CEO of Behavioral Health Resources (BHR), said he was startled when he saw the cover and some later media segments about the report that used graphic video. "Promoting these images for funding … can harm clients. What if someone believes they’re in need of mental health care and are afraid to show up [at a treatment center] because they think other clients will be dangerous?”

Navos CEO David Johnson said, “Fear-based politics in America has led to poor decisions. It’s tempting to use fear to prompt action, but so much is lost when we take that path. So I was sad to see the cover of this publication…. This is one of those learning moments when we can say we can do better.”

Everyone quoted in this article mentioned the lurid media coverage of SEIU Healthcare’s press conference about “Don’t Look Away” at the State Capitol. A Fox13 reporter discussing the event waved a kitchen knife at the camera as she described how a man with schizophrenia had recently attacked a passerby.

Later, The Stranger explained “How a decimated state budget equals more unmedicated loons with hatchets.” (Proof, if you needed it, that people with mental illnesses may be the only group of human beings the media feel perfectly free to call names. Would a Stranger headline warning about STDs and male-male sex without condoms contain the phrase “unprotected fairies with AIDS”? How about an obesity epidemic story concerning "unrestrained fatties with popsicles"?)

Rosenblum, pointing to my article on psychiatric care at Monroe prison, said, “All of us who advocate for better mental health care have a tough job to do, connecting the dots with the general public without causing more fear of ‘the Other.’” There's "always a fine line between hauling out the crisis and stigmatizing,” he said. “It’s a legitimate concern to raise, to say we didn’t find that sweet spot."

However, he emphasized that what advocacy “does not need is a lot of ‘he-said-she-said’ about stigmatizing. We need to work together.”

And that’s true, too.


About the Author

As part of Crosscut’s coverage of social concerns, Judy Lightfoot writes about how the region's people face challenges in a time of economic stress and diminished expectations. She often draws on her weekly one-on-one coffees with individuals sharing our public spaces who are socially isolated by homelessness or mental illness. Formerly a teacher and professor, she also writes about books, education, and the arts. Email judy.lightfoot@crosscut.com.

Like what you just read? Support high quality local journalism. Become a member of Crosscut today!

Comments:

Posted Wed, Jan 5, 11:25 a.m. Inappropriate

I, too, was terribly concerned about the ill-considered tactics used by the communications staff at SEIU and very much appreciate your bringing the issue of stigma and mental illness to a wider audience. In my work with the National Alliance on Mental Illness (NAMI), I meet hundreds of people every year living their lives with dignity and courage in spite of enormous stigma, a lack of help, misunderstanding and yes, society's cruelty. The message we want to send is that services work, medications work and recovery is possible. Thank you.

Sincerely,
Farrell Adrian,
President, NAMI Washington

Farrell

Posted Wed, Jan 5, 12:21 p.m. Inappropriate

There is another IMPORTANT factor here that the SEIU didn't consider and this article doesn't address. There are many, many citizens that feel that, mental illness or not, these people just belong in prisons if they are dangerous. The SEIU's tactic reinforces this and makes this portion of the citizenry even LESS likely to support this care, not more.

gollybe

Posted Wed, Jan 5, 12:37 p.m. Inappropriate

Those arguing against the SEIU strategy assume that the Legislature, the union's target audience, is a rational place and makes decisions based on wisdom and the public interest. But we all know it isn't. While we might blanch at some of the rhetoric, it's not entirely misplaced.

Posted Wed, Jan 5, 1:28 p.m. Inappropriate

For those who doubt that cutting mental health services could well lead to bad and dangerous results, check out the recent excellent Stranger cover story on mental patient and hatchet killer Michael LaRosa:
http://www.thestranger.com/seattle/the-hatchet/Content?oid=5860130

Posted Fri, Jan 7, 1:46 p.m. Inappropriate

This article points to control social control strategies that are mental health policy and law here in Washington. NAMI had a lot to do with this. Running
Right next to this article was another article which tells how we must protect ouselves from these violent people?! Bigotry directed towards any group is ugly it is unfortunate the major source of the stigma is based onmisinformation and propaganda. There is no evidence of disease. Neuroleptics do kill and cause illness and disability.

Posted Fri, Jan 7, 4:36 p.m. Inappropriate

I lived in California when Reagan closed down the required placement of mentally ill "harmles" people in hospitals. They were turned out in the streetw without the promised out patient care.
I feel that it is time to reopen these hospitals or residences for the people who have mental problems. They should be structured to be liveable places where it would be a place the folks would want to stay with medical help. It cannot be required but I am sure that a large number of the mentally ill who are presently on the streets and in other sad enviornments would be better and cheaper housed treated and served with these type of facilities.
John Lay

Morro

Login or register to add your voice to the conversation.

Join Crosscut now!
Subscribe to our Newsletter

Follow Us »