Starbucks new logo: hold the coffee

There's a still a mermaid, but the company name and the chief product have walked the gang plank.

The evolution of Starbucks logos

Courtesy of Starbucks

The evolution of Starbucks logos

The earliest logo for Starbucks

Courtesy of Starbucks

The earliest logo for Starbucks

By their signs ye shall know them. There's nothing more important for a consumer brand than its logo, the thinking goes. McDonald's wouldn't be Mickey D's without those Golden Arches, formed by the gracefully rounded "M" of its name. You don't have to see the name on the Nike sneakers to recognize its graceful swoosh, or own an iPod to recognize the bite taken out of a Jonagold.

“Even though we have been and always will be a coffee company and retailer," says CEO Howard Schultz, "it's possible we’ll have other products with our name on it and no coffee in it.” (He says it on video here.)

That's already happening, frankly, with all the sandwiches, sweets, and non-coffee beverages available at the company's 17,000 stores. But this goes a step further, dropping the Starbucks name and the word "COFFEE" from the logo completely.

"It's a gutsy move," says Terry Heckler, the Seattle graphic artist and ad director who designed the original logo some 40 years ago. In a redesign some years ago, Heckler lost the breasts on the first siren, because they were sort of an in-joke at the beginning. But the mermaid, the siren, was always part of the logo. The company's founders wanted Starbucks to signify the spirit of adventure and exploring implied by a seafaring image, and the name taken from the real Mister Starbucks, first mate on the fictional Pequod in Moby Dick, reinforced that.

What now? Even if the public can still connect the image of a mermaid with the company that sells Frappuccino, will that extend to other Starbucks ventures? Clothing? Automotive? Is this just another mood swing by a petulant, moody teenager, as we suggested in a post on Crosscut just six months ago?

Heckler says it's going to be interesting to see what Starbucks makes of its new nameless logo: "There's no question that the strongest brand signal is the name." If the siren herself (emblematic of adventure on the high seas, a symbol of the yearning for coffee) no longer makes sense, why keep her around? Without the ring of words, of the company's name, and its flagship product, she's just "a princess with a crown on her head," Heckler points out.

The upshot? "A horrible misjudgment."


Topics: Business

About the Author

Seattle writer Ronald Holden blogs at Cornichon.org. He can be reached at editor@crosscut.com.

Like what you just read? Support high quality local journalism. Become a member of Crosscut today!

Comments:

Posted Thu, Jan 6, 9:55 a.m. Inappropriate

"...Mister Starbucks, first mate on the fictional Pequod in Moby Dick..."

His name was actually Starbuck.

bigyaz

Posted Thu, Jan 6, 10:04 a.m. Inappropriate

A "horrible misjudgment"?

Perhaps not.
Maybe they just wanted to make a statement that Starbucks is all "green" now. But the new naked logo, sans text, has a sterile, vapid appearance.

Posted Thu, Jan 6, 10:37 a.m. Inappropriate

Shocking that the designer of the original logo calls the new one a "horrible misjudgment."

As if any artist would say, "Wow, that's SO much better than my work!"

bigyaz

Posted Thu, Jan 6, 12:19 p.m. Inappropriate

For starters, one color is probably easier (therefore cheaper) to print on the cups, no small saving considering how many millions of them they go through.

The corollary to this is their logo has become so ubiquitous and so familiar that just seeing the mermaid (or siren, if you prefer) gets the point across. Target does the same thing. Mercedes-Benz has done it for decades. No words necessary.

Starbucks' primary color has been green since Howard Schultz and his partners bought the company.

Mr. Heckler's comments seem to be more about his dismay that his original design has now been fully discarded than any real knowledge of why this was done...

orino

Posted Thu, Jan 6, 4:43 p.m. Inappropriate

I heard an interview with Starbucks founders Jerry Baldwin, Zev Siegl, and Gordon Bowker (now of Peets Coffee) debunking the popular Moby Dick myth. According to the founders, they closed their eyes and pointed at a map of Washington state. The finger landed on the small southeast Washington town of Starbuck.

Eric

Posted Fri, Jan 7, 8:49 a.m. Inappropriate

"...and the name taken from the real Mister Starbucks, first mate on the fictional Pequod in Moby Dick, reinforced that."

And here I'd always thought is was named after Dirk Benedict's character on "Battlestar Galactica."

dbreneman

Login or register to add your voice to the conversation.

Join Crosscut now!
Subscribe to our Newsletter

Follow Us »