Letter to editor: We need the truth about radiation levels
Accurate information is missing about ionizing radiation in Washington state.
The othe day I read: University of California (Nuclear Engineering Department) at Berkeley Campus finds significant levels of radioactive iodine from Fukushima Daiichi nuclear catastrophe in San Francisco Bay rainwater, tap water and milk (http://www.nuc.berkeley.edu/node/2278).
I do not think we are being told the truth in Washington state about the level of ionizing radiation affecting our surface water supplies and food. We do have a right to accurate information.
Please do all you can to accurately report what is happening.
Brenda Loew
Seattle
Like what you just read? Support high quality local journalism. Become a member of Crosscut today!











Twitter
Facebook
RSS Feeds
Comments:
Posted Wed, Apr 6, 1:11 p.m. Inappropriate
http://www.doh.wa.gov/Topics/japan2011.htm
Posted Thu, Apr 7, 11:36 a.m. Inappropriate
The real news from Fukushima is that even with everything possible going wrong, nobody has died as a result of the damage to the reactor. Dozens of people are killed every year installing wind turbines and mining coal. Imagine what would happen if Grand Coulee Dam collapsed. In the grand scheme of things, nuclear power is notable for its safety.
Posted Fri, Apr 8, 8:08 a.m. Inappropriate
Here is a good source of daily air monitoring data by the EPA in your area:
http://www.epa.gov/radiation/rert/radnet-seattle-bg.html
Also here:
http://www.doh.wa.gov/Topics/japan/monitor.htm
This may put things in perspective for you:
"Today, EPA released its latest RadNet results, which include the first results for drinking water. Drinking water samples from two locations, Boise, Idaho and Richland, Washington, showed trace amounts of Iodine-131 – about 0.2 picocuries per liter in each case. An infant would have to drink almost 7,000 liters of this water to receive a radiation dose equivalent to a day’s worth of the natural background radiation exposure we experience continuously from natural sources of radioactivity in our environment."
http://yosemite.epa.gov/opa/admpress.nsf/d0cf6618525a9efb85257359003fb69d/f118f3b38ec3748d8525786900020035!OpenDocument
Posted Sat, Apr 9, 1:32 p.m. Inappropriate
We have no idea whether anyone in the area of the damaged nuclear reactors has died as a result of being exposed to the results of that damage. Neither the Japanese government nor the private operator of the plant is giving us any information on illness or deaths.
In the grand scheme of things, DBreneman, nuclear reactors which are operated by fallible human beings and are affected by natural disasters are an incredibly dangerous method of providing power. Comparing them to wind turbines is asinine.
Posted Sat, Apr 9, 8:02 p.m. Inappropriate
Here's an article from the NYT about the fact that Japan--probably the highest-tech nation in the world--used unskilled, poorly-paid contractors at its nuclear power plants. So much for nuclear power plant safety.
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/04/10/world/asia/10workers.html?_r=1
Posted Sun, Apr 10, 8:21 a.m. Inappropriate
And yet, so far no one has died. The technology is essentially safe.
Login or register to add your voice to the conversation.