Letter to editor: We need the truth about radiation levels

Accurate information is missing about ionizing radiation in Washington state.

Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power station, as pictured on the Tokyo Electric Power Co. site.

TEPCO

Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power station, as pictured on the Tokyo Electric Power Co. site.

The othe day I read: University of California (Nuclear Engineering Department) at Berkeley Campus finds significant levels of radioactive iodine from Fukushima Daiichi nuclear catastrophe in San Francisco Bay rainwater, tap water and milk (http://www.nuc.berkeley.edu/node/2278).

I do not think we are being told the truth in Washington state about the level of ionizing radiation affecting our surface water supplies and food. We do have a right to accurate information.

Please do all you can to accurately report what is happening.

Brenda Loew

Seattle


About the Author

To see more letters, click here.

Like what you just read? Support high quality local journalism. Become a member of Crosscut today!

Comments:

Posted Wed, Apr 6, 1:11 p.m. Inappropriate

http://www.doh.wa.gov/Topics/japan2011.htm

BlueLight

Posted Thu, Apr 7, 11:36 a.m. Inappropriate

Radiation measuring devices are incredibly sensitive. They can detect changes that are barely there. Even if the background radiation level increases several hundred percent above normal, it's only equivalent to about what you get from using CFL instead of incandescent lamps in your home, and we all know how environmentally friendly CFL lamps are...

The real news from Fukushima is that even with everything possible going wrong, nobody has died as a result of the damage to the reactor. Dozens of people are killed every year installing wind turbines and mining coal. Imagine what would happen if Grand Coulee Dam collapsed. In the grand scheme of things, nuclear power is notable for its safety.

dbreneman

Posted Fri, Apr 8, 8:08 a.m. Inappropriate

Here is a good source of daily air monitoring data by the EPA in your area:

http://www.epa.gov/radiation/rert/radnet-seattle-bg.html

Also here:

http://www.doh.wa.gov/Topics/japan/monitor.htm

This may put things in perspective for you:

"Today, EPA released its latest RadNet results, which include the first results for drinking water. Drinking water samples from two locations, Boise, Idaho and Richland, Washington, showed trace amounts of Iodine-131 – about 0.2 picocuries per liter in each case. An infant would have to drink almost 7,000 liters of this water to receive a radiation dose equivalent to a day’s worth of the natural background radiation exposure we experience continuously from natural sources of radioactivity in our environment."

http://yosemite.epa.gov/opa/admpress.nsf/d0cf6618525a9efb85257359003fb69d/f118f3b38ec3748d8525786900020035!OpenDocument

Herb

Posted Sat, Apr 9, 1:32 p.m. Inappropriate

We have no idea whether anyone in the area of the damaged nuclear reactors has died as a result of being exposed to the results of that damage. Neither the Japanese government nor the private operator of the plant is giving us any information on illness or deaths.

In the grand scheme of things, DBreneman, nuclear reactors which are operated by fallible human beings and are affected by natural disasters are an incredibly dangerous method of providing power. Comparing them to wind turbines is asinine.

sarah90

Posted Sat, Apr 9, 8:02 p.m. Inappropriate

Here's an article from the NYT about the fact that Japan--probably the highest-tech nation in the world--used unskilled, poorly-paid contractors at its nuclear power plants. So much for nuclear power plant safety.

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/04/10/world/asia/10workers.html?_r=1

sarah90

Posted Sun, Apr 10, 8:21 a.m. Inappropriate

And yet, so far no one has died. The technology is essentially safe.

dbreneman

Login or register to add your voice to the conversation.

Join Crosscut now!
Subscribe to our Newsletter

Follow Us »