Wouldn't Ichiro, M's benefit from a trade to a contender?
The slow start doesn't mean anything. He will still hit .300, but with a trade he could do it for a team where his skills might mean something even more glorious than what he has already done for Seattle.
Trade Ichiro?
They're the two words I never thought I'd type.
Is it time? It might be.
Ichiro Suzuki has been Seattle’s best and most pleasurable-to-watch athlete of the past decade. His production has been as consistent as it is — not was but is – remarkable. There isn’t any reason to believe his performance level will drop off this season or even next, which is precisely why the timing might be perfect for a swap ASAP.
Ichiro still has good (if not great) trade value. Yes, after an 0-for-5 matinee Wednesday (April 13) he’s hitting just .245. Yes, he’s had slow Aprils before. Yes, I’ll bet you my house that he hits .300 or better this season and I’ll toss in both of my dogs. And, yes, there are clubs that would put up impressive trade bait to get him at the front of their lineups.
What the Mariners presently need on offense isn’t what Ich can give them. He gets on base but nobody drives him in. Heading to Kansas City for four games before another home stand next week, Ich had crossed the plate just five times.
The M’s need power in the middle of the lineup, real power rather than the threat of an occasional home run. Managers understand this. Much has been made about the Justin Smoak acquisition as an attempt to put power into the middle. Maybe Smoak is a 30-home-run guy but his single dinger during the first 12 games projects to just 13 for the season and that’s if he plays every game.
Chone Figgins can be the lead-off guy for the time being. He’s younger than Ichiro and accustomed to batting first. Any number of others can play right field, especially if the Ichiro trade bait includes a quality outfielder.
Ichiro isn’t nearly the draw he once was. Obviously he isn’t the only reason for the M’s attendance level hitting bedrock during the recent home stand. What the Wednesday “crowd” of 12,407 (Monday they lured just 13,056) should be telling M’s execs is that they can’t count on picking up a lot of interest anymore in a product that is only technically major-league-level baseball.
This management group needs to start doing whatever it takes to see to it that the Seattle Mariners don’t lose their death-race with the Washington Nationals/Montreal Expos and become the last of the modern big-league teams to go to a World Series (if indeed they ever do get there).
Trading Ichiro obviously isn’t the sole component of putting together a pennant contender. But all the patter from the management the past few months about building a contender from the farm system no doubt sounds to many of the remaining fans like something commonly found on farms. If M’s execs are alarmed by sparse crowds now, wait until the presently 4-8 team is 10 games below .500 (that would be May 3 at the rate they're “playing”).
But there’s an even better reason to release Ich, preferably to a pennant-contender. Think of what he’s given fans in this region: the throw (or The Throw, as many refer to it), when he fired an elongated strike from right field to nail Oakland’s Terrence Long at third base; the infield hit off Randy Johnson in the 2001 all-star game at Safeco; the all-time-best 262-hit season in 2004, etc.
Don’t we kind of collectively owe Ichiro the chance to get to the post-season and maybe even help win a World Series? Obviously it isn’t going to happen here anytime soon and even Ichiro Suzuki will have to retire someday (albeit, to look at the seldom-injured specimen, maybe not for another decade).
Five years after that happens he’ll enter the Hall of Fame as a Seattle Mariner. Given the chance, though, he may yet find his greatest glory playing for a much better team.
Like what you just read? Support high quality local journalism. Become a member of Crosscut today!










Twitter
Facebook
RSS Feeds
Comments:
Posted Thu, Apr 14, 12:14 p.m. Inappropriate
I always wondered how the Boston Red Sox head office conversation went when they talked themselves into trading Babe Ruth to the Yankees. Now I know!
Posted Thu, Apr 14, 1:53 p.m. Inappropriate
No.
Posted Thu, Apr 14, 2:05 p.m. Inappropriate
"Getting to play for one team their entire (Major League) career is not something many players get to do," Ichiro said at a news conference. "Having that choice made me happy."
I wonder if he would want to go? He has a no trade deal where he can specify 10 teams he does NOT want to go to.
We're going to be paying him for a long time no matter what the case:
Deferred interest rate: 5.5
Deferred salary notes: $25000000 Million ($5000000 Million annually) deferred at 5.5% interest, reducing deal's average annual value to $16100000 Million (deferred money to be paid in annual installments Jan. 30 beginning year after his retirement).
Posted Thu, Apr 14, 2:09 p.m. Inappropriate
oops, there are some extra zeros there!
Deferred interest rate: 5.5
Deferred salary notes: $25 Million ($5 Million annually) deferred at 5.5% interest, reducing deal's average annual value to $16.1 Million (deferred money to be paid in annual installments Jan. 30 beginning year after his retirement).
Posted Thu, Apr 14, 2:14 p.m. Inappropriate
These kind of pieces are crunchier when solid possible deals are proposed. Sure, it'd be great to get some magic beans for the best player on the roster, but will they grow? Or rather, what could Z get in return for the one everyday player that makes this club a major league team? Minor league prospects? A young not-quite-yet star? Who needs Ichiro! enough to consider overpaying for him? Since he should be considered a player capable of excelling for another four years, and one who likes playing here, we ought to get extra for him if a deal is to be made. He's capable of still being stellar when the youth movement underway blooms, and that would be payoff for him and the fans alike. Finally, if a deal is to be made, let it not be with a northeast team, decades of having Seattle players sent there to shine is enough already.
Posted Thu, Apr 14, 3:51 p.m. Inappropriate
What the Mariners really need is to trade owners. I am grateful Mr. Yamauchi stepped up and led the group that among other things prevented the Mariners from moving to Tampa Bay (where we've seen that Major League Baseball has been a total failure), but the Seattle Mariners are NOT Nintendo. A professional sports team does not benefit from being run with an eye toward saving pennies.
The M's need a Mark Cuban, a passionate baseball fan with a gigantic pile of money who wants more than anything to win a World Series (or three) and is willing to do or spend whatever it takes to make that happen. The only question is, who might that be?
Posted Thu, Apr 14, 5:06 p.m. Inappropriate
Sorry Mike, but your idea stinks. You must have forgotten the 1980s Mariners--no chance, no hope, no fans. Yes, we can go back.
The "Trade Ichiro, Trade Felix" crowd forgets that without those two players, there is no good reason to go to the ballpark. You obviously think that thousands of people will keep coming to Safeco Field to watch Triple-A quality ballplayers scrimmage. Check with the folks in Cleveland on that.
Posted Thu, Apr 14, 7:02 p.m. Inappropriate
Here's your Mariner Haiku for today:
Flashes of brilliance
Then fundamental failure
Another year lost
Posted Thu, Apr 14, 7:07 p.m. Inappropriate
Mike,
Go back to teaching journalism but don't pretend you have any idea what's going on in baseball.
Do you seriously think that the NINTENDO Mariners would trade Ichiro ever? Nintendo would sooner kill the Wii before trading Ichiro. What we need to win a series is to wrest the team from the Nintendo destroyers and get rid of Armstrong and Lincoln... Then we might be getting somewhere...
Posted Thu, Apr 14, 10 p.m. Inappropriate
Of course, the M's should trade Ichiro. They should have traded him years ago when he still had some trade value. I doubt they would get much of anything for him now, plus the M's would have to pay much of his salary while he was playing for a different team. Ichiro does absolutely nothing for the M's. How much worse could the Mariners possibly be than they are now, with Ichiro?
And, for the clowns lumping Felix in with Ichiro: Felix is a superstar, arguably the best pitcher in baseball last year. Ichiro is one of the most-overrated players in the history of Major League Baseball.
Felix is very young, and not making too much money. Ichiro is old and getting paid a ludicrously high salary.
Felix possibly has his best years ahead of him. Ichiro is way past his prime which was incredibly overrated.
There is absolutely zero comparison between Felix, who is the real deal, and Ichiro, who is not.
Felix could conceivably be part of a decent M's future. Ichiro has no future.
Alas, the M's management is not nearly intelligent enough to make any sort of decent trade, but if they could just fool some poor team into taking Ichiro off our hands, including a decent chunk of his salary, I say go for it.
Posted Fri, Apr 15, 7:42 a.m. Inappropriate
Sorry Mike, but your idea stinks. You must have forgotten the 1980s Mariners--no chance, no hope, no fans. Yes, we can go back.
The "Trade Ichiro, Trade Felix" crowd forgets that without those two players, there is no good reason to go to the ballpark. You obviously think that thousands of people will keep coming to Safeco Field to watch Triple-A quality ballplayers scrimmage. Check with the folks in Cleveland on that.
Amen, to that brother. You don't trade your best assets. You get rid of the deadwood and replace it with a better asset. The Mariners seem to have a lot of AAA players on their roster, not major league ready ones.
Ichiro and Felix shouldn't go anywhere.
Posted Fri, Apr 15, 8:35 a.m. Inappropriate
Lincoln - You are mostly right on Felix; totally wrong on Ichiro. It seems you have no fundamental understanding of the game of baseball.
You are scratching the surface with your comment on Mariner management. Perhaps both you and them share similar notions about what constitutes viable baseball players.
Posted Fri, Apr 15, 8:56 a.m. Inappropriate
Trade Chone instead. Slide Ryan to third. Put Jack Wilson back at short. Bring up Ackley in May so he doesn't get his full season. Put Wilson in the 2 hole. Wilson is a guy who can always make contact and think more about the team than himself -- something nobody would ever say about Chone with a straight face.
This whole Chone think is as dumb an experiment as the whole infield swap thing the last two years.
Posted Fri, Apr 15, 10:54 a.m. Inappropriate
Reasons this is a very bad idea:
1. The M's would get nowhere near enough in return; as much as I love Ichiro he's not a difference maker for a contending team.
2. The M's would still have to pay part of his salary to get anyone to make the deal.
3. The M's would lose one of the few reasons left to attend a game.
Otherwise, great idea, Mike!
Posted Fri, Apr 15, 12:29 p.m. Inappropriate
This is what is wrong with professional sports - people support and even encourage players to think that their individual success is more important than being part of a team. The idea that Ichiro could do something more glorious than completing his career working here in Seattle on a team that he has worked so hard and so selflessly to support is like telling him, "give up, Dude, you just wasted the best years of your life on a futile effort." He deserves more respect than that. He knows whats he's doing and nobody in the business does it like he does.
Posted Fri, Apr 15, 5:06 p.m. Inappropriate
Great posts, thanks. Perhaps M's brass will see some of your stuff and take it to heart (after our four years online M's execs have granted Crosscut access to the press box and for that we thank them).
I still don't see any articulation of a compelling downside to trading him. I'd miss his slap hits, discipline and winning grin (about the only "winning" we've seen from these guys since '01). But no one has quantified for me the value of keeping a guy who (no matter what his batting average and hit totals are) doesn't score a lot of runs and doesn't put butts on seats. He hasn't been a novelty here for a long time but he sure could be in some other big-league town.
Posted Mon, Apr 18, 11:02 p.m. Inappropriate
I agree with you, Mike. He's an expensive player at ~ 1/5 of the team's salary and could still bring back multiple players. It's made a lot of sense for a lot of time. Figgins, though, hasn't impressed, but the team couldn't get much worse. They're already in position to get their third #2 draft pick in the last few years. Someday, some of these top choices have to bear fruit?!?
Login or register to add your voice to the conversation.