Our Sponsors:

Read more »

Our Members

Many thanks to Rodney Brown and Small Town Papers some of our many supporters.

ALL MEMBERS »

Seattle police need stronger leadership from McGinn, Diaz

New ideas can be helpful. But the only way to implement them and improve police-community relations is for the hard work of leadership to occur.

Mayor Mike McGinn

Mayor Mike McGinn

Seattle Police Chief John Diaz

Seattle Police Chief John Diaz City of Seattle

Seattle’s police department has been under a lot of scrutiny recently due to some controversial incidents with officers and the public — most significantly, the tragic shooting death of John Williams. The department is being investigated by the U.S. Department of Justice, and the results from that investigation will hopefully help restore both the public’s faith in the department and improve the morale for officers.

It will be important for Mayor Mike McGinn and Police Chief John Diaz to show they can lead a department that, at the moment, seems to be adrift. Into the leadership vacuum at the moment, however, has stepped the head of the Seattle Police Officers Guild, Rich O’Neill.

The SPD command staff and mayor have decided to stand back and let outside forces, like the DOJ, provide political cover for the management of the department. In the absence of the chief speaking up more strongly for the professionalism of the rank and file, O’Neill has become the public voice for the department.

This is not a healthy state of affairs and the mayor and Diaz need to step up and exert leadership now if there is any hope of improving the way the police and community work together to enhance community safety.

There are some great ideas out there on how policing can be improved for both the officers and the community.

Recently, law enforcement researchers from George Mason University came to town. In a visit with Crosscut, their presentation went into some detail about the policing of place, crime prevention through environmental design (CPTED), and integrating crime analysis with policing.

But much of the focus was on leadership and providing police officers with the freedom and incentive to work with neighbors and business owners in a partnership for community safety. And while crime analysis, mapping, and integrating these tools into patrol is an emphasis of their strategy, a focus on creating effective leadership is central to accomplishing these goals.

But there is a feeling among officers that they are much more scrutinized by the Police Department than being given the freedom to develop their own ideas and programs. The department seems to be far more concerned about liability than developing tactics for crime fighting. 

Additionally, officers are too often isolated by the beat structure and don’t coordinate and share information with other officers. There is little emphasis given to proactive policing — getting of the car and interacting with people in the area. Instead of policing of place, officers more often than not tend to answer calls and be reactive.

The GMU researchers have some good ideas on how to change this: alter field training sheets to force new habits (field training sheets are a checklist used in evaluations), integrate crime analysis units into patrol, change how officers are promoted (too often proactive officers are passed over because they tend to make waves), and create a radio code to record proactive policing, so it’s tracked in the records management system and used to evaluate officers for training or promotion purposes.

These are all good ideas but there is a bigger problem that can only be addressed by our political and department leadership. The distrust between the Mayor, the Chief of Police, and the rank and file union — the Seattle Police Officers' Guild — is making change impossible. There is concern by officers that if they are proactive and something goes wrong, neither the department nor the city leadership will support them. There is a void of leadership in the Department Command Staff that is, unfortunately, being filled by the Guild.

It is unfortunate because the Guild is an advocacy organization like any other union. The President of the Guild, Rich O’Neill, and the Board are elected democratically by their members. They are charged with trying to get the best deal possible for their members and to protect their interests. They should not be the leaders of the department. O’Neill has stepped into a larger role largely because the mayor and the chief have ceded that ground.


Like what you just read? Support high quality local journalism. Become a member of Crosscut today!

Comments:

Posted Wed, May 18, 10:29 a.m. Inappropriate


Sounds like the police could benefit from sharing ideas using a "social network" that would let them talk peer to peer.

While I didn't like the shooting of John T. Williams (notice, I use the word "like" not "condone") I felt the leadership collapsed around the officer whose actions -- if you study the videos taken by police of Williams during the past year -- become more understandable.

However, let's bury the hatchet on that for now. If there are still problems, putting top down pressure from the Feds will only work for a so long.

If there is any subliminal racism, or if police are acting as a if they are a foreign presence rather than integrated into the citizenry, then it's a big problem.

jabailo

Login or register to add your voice to the conversation.

Join Crosscut now!
Subscribe to our Newsletter

Follow Us »