Ten things you might not know about the economy

For example, student debt in the U.S. is now greater than credit-card debt. Here are some more possible surprises, and economic signs to keep watching.

Boeing plans to add 1,200 jobs at its Renton plant over the next couple of years.

Yasuhiko Obara Yasobara, Wikimedia Commons

Boeing plans to add 1,200 jobs at its Renton plant over the next couple of years.

With this week's somewhat encouraging news about unemployment in Washington state, here are 10 things you should know about the local, state and national economies:

1. The recovery is real, but the pace of growth will remain subdued for months to come. There are too many potential shocks to the economy for a sustained, strong, job-producing recovery to take hold. Housing as a personal asset and as an industry, for example, will likely continue to suffer for years.

According to the Zillow Home Value Index, housing prices in the Greater Seattle area have declined about 27 percent from their peak in the summer of 2007. With a high level of foreclosures still in the market, those home values will be very slow to rise. Even a modest 3-percent-a-year increase would mean almost 10 years before a home’s price could return to anything near its peak.

2. Washington’s economy may have picked up a little more steam than first thought toward the end of last year. Washington Employment Security Department economists “benchmark” their unemployment figures. That means they check their estimates of job growth against actual employment records.

So last October, economists were still reporting the state was losing jobs. When economists went back to double-check their numbers, they found some 16,000 jobs more than they expected. “The recovery appeared a little earlier and a little better than we first expected,” said David Wallace, the department’s chief economist.

3. The Seattle area has an unusual mix of employment and unemployment. Boeing announced Tuesday (May 17) that it was adding 1,200 jobs on the 737 assembly line in Renton. On Wednesday (May 18), the Employment Security Department reported that Seattle-area unemployment went up to 8.7 percent in April from 8.6 percent in March, a figure that translates into 128,000 people. The difference likely lies in the kinds of jobs being added: mostly high-tech or skilled manufacturing positions.

If you’ve got the right skills, odds are you’ll land a job. If not, it will continue to be a tough road to employment, or could mean accepting positions that pay much less.

4. Inflation seems under control, but the factors that lead to rapidly rising prices at some point in the future are emerging. Most economists focus on “core” inflation, which leaves out energy and food, mostly because those two items are fairly volatile. The two together make up about 20 percent of the Consumer Price Index, reflecting the costs in most consumer budgets. Gas prices get a lot of headlines — rightly so — but gas usually makes up only a small percentage of spending. It’s really psychological: When gas prices hit $4 a gallon, we change our behavior.

Why worry about inflation? The Federal Reserve has been pumping money into the economy for two years, helping to keep the economy afloat. But all that money has to go someplace, and eventually it will result in rising prices. Money is a commodity. The price of money right now is near zero since the Fed has kept interest rates at that level since the recession began.

Too much money chasing too few goods is the classic definition of inflation. We have too much money and we may start chasing too few goods within two, three, or four years. Thomas Hoenig, president of the Kansas City Federal Reserve Bank and a now famous critic of Fed policy, points out that the inflation of the 1980s started in the “guns and butter” policies of the 1960s.

In a recent speech he said: "Central bankers must look to the long run. If current policy remains in place, we almost certainly will stimulate the growth of asset values and inflation. This may temporarily increase GDP and employment, but in the long run, we risk instability, damaging inflation, and lost jobs, which is a dear price for middle- and lower-income citizens to pay.”

5. The debt-ceiling debate will get very nasty. Lots of rhetoric. Lots of confusion. Lots of name calling. Congress should just raise the limit and be done with it. With all the jabbering in Washington, one fact will remain: U.S. Treasuries — the bonds we sell to ourselves and the world to finance our debt — really have no competition. Investors, from foreign governments to my own IRA, have few options. Japan? Its debt is approaching 200 percent of its GDP. The Euro? Sure, but what about Spain and Greece? Swiss francs? Great, but a limited market with little liquidity.

Sorry, China, Japan and ourselves have little choice. No reason to make it a political football, but don’t worry about it too much either.

6. Both parties are right about the nation's debt, so the country needs a bipartisan approach. The Republicans are correct about the debt and the need to do something about it. The Democrats are correct about the need to make spending cuts in a thoughtful way.

7. The day-to-day movement of the stock market isn't worth watching closely unless, of course, you are an active investor. There are many factors that make the stock market move, from rumors to world events to comments by stock analysts to decisions by the Federal Reserve Board.

In a broader economic sense, though, the stock market is a fairly good leading economic indicator. The general rule is that it is a view of what the economy will be like in six months. The market has increased nicely over the past year, so the general sense of the market is that the economy is getting better. For the past six weeks, however, the market has been relatively stagnant, perhaps an indication that the recovery may be slower than expected.

8. We live in strange times. Student loan debt, at about $800 billion now, is greater than credit-card debt in the country. Quite a commentary on our education system and how money is used. Some students are also saddled with high interest rates on the loans (8 percent), when almost all of us are getting practically free money from the Fed – 30-year mortgages at 5 percent, for example. Couldn’t the government offer some sort of refinancing option for students?

9. China's economy is worth watching closely. It is changing dramatically as it moves from being the “factory of the world” to its own self-sustaining domestic economy. It is like the U.S. economy at the end of World War II. A sudden surge of an educated, well-paid, willing-to-spend middle class will remake the Chinese economy.

It is also changing from a world viewpoint. News reports last week said that Coach, the luxury handbag company, would shift more of its production out of China at the same time it expected to sell more bags in the Chinese domestic market.

10. And finally an optimistic note: Manufacturing — the business of making things — seems to be coming back across the country. We in Western Washington have been spared the “rust belt” problems with such solid companies here as Boeing and Paccar. These jobs are key because of the multiplier effect.

Manufacturing jobs generate jobs in the service sector of the economy. A well-paid Boeing engineer has to buy groceries for his or her family, get a haircut, buy gas, plant flowers, educate children, and so forth. I include Microsoft as a manufacturer, by the way, because it produces a product — maybe not a big heavy truck like Paccar's but a product nonetheless.


Like what you just read? Support high quality local journalism. Become a member of Crosscut today!

Comments:

Posted Fri, May 20, 10:01 a.m. Inappropriate

Re-financing of federal student loans is a great idea. Seems like that could be an economic stimulus both parties could agree on...

pika

Posted Fri, May 20, 10:56 a.m. Inappropriate

Stephen,

In an ocean of argument about the Viaduct and Seattle schools, finally! a post about the financial basics,and prospects, of the regional, NW economy.

BRAVO!!

Ross

Ross

Posted Fri, May 20, 12:21 p.m. Inappropriate

"We may be seeing the dawn of a new era for the U.S. economy, when we return to our roots, making and growing things that the world needs."

Operative word: "needs." What the world needs now is less consumption, yet with all the excess money about to chase things to spend it on, that is not likely to happen, especially with this generation of greens preoccupied with carbon.

afreeman

Posted Fri, May 20, 3:13 p.m. Inappropriate

One thing that was left out,,, campaign finance reform.

We need to take notice to who is influencing whom and how things got the way they are.

As far as the debt ceiling, no more debt,,,,cut the czars, renegotiate union contracts, eliminate redundancies and cut all middle managers to make each department accountable.

I officially owe more on my house than its worth no fault of my own, so who is responsible for that? Where's my stimulus check?

salmonjim

Posted Sat, May 21, 11:03 a.m. Inappropriate

Why is "active trading" described as "investing"? It's got nothing to do with investing. It's gambling on stock prices, pure and simple. Gambling, not investing. BTW, see Joe Nocera's column in today's NY Times about the LinkedIn IPO scam? (Here: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/05/21/opinion/21nocera.html)

Posted Sun, May 22, 7:46 a.m. Inappropriate

Stephen Dunphy wrote:
"Gas prices get a lot of headlines — rightly so — but gas usually makes up only a small percentage of spending. It’s really psychological: When gas prices hit $4 a gallon, we change our behavior."

Gas prices have a significant effect though on rural communities. Rural incomes are significantly lower than urban/suburban incomes. There is no mass transit. Commute distances are long. Oftentimes work vehicles need to also be used for commuting. The implications are significant from a political standpoint if one looks at where the "red" voters and "blue" voters are located.

In Montana, the price increase in gasoline amounted to $449 per month or roughly 15% of income. Compare that to a cost per month of $214 per month or 4.7% of income in New York.
[Reference: http://money.cnn.com/2010/12/21/news/economy/gas_prices/index.htm]

There are quite a bit more people that fall in this situation. But then again, they aren't the type typically that read Crosscut.

Posted Sun, May 22, 9:06 a.m. Inappropriate

Stephen Dunphy wrote:
"6. Both parties are right about the nation's debt, so the country needs a bipartisan approach. The Republicans are correct about the debt and the need to do something about it. The Democrats are correct about the need to make spending cuts in a thoughtful way."

The problem with this statement is that you have bought into the Republican narrative that the solution to the national debt is through spending cuts. The last time that the US had a balanced budget was at the end of the Clinton administration. That budget was characterized by tax revenue that was at 20% of GDP and a defense department budget of 3% of GDP. Since that time, we've seen defense spending increase to 4.5% of GDP and revenues decrease to as low as 14-15% of GDP during the worst part of the recession. Note - historically, US government spending has ranged between 17-18% of GDP.

With regards to entitlement spending, the current exclusively private "free-market" system is an utter failure by all objective measures. The US spends 17% of its national income on healthcare. The European "socialist" system spend 10% and obtain better outcomes as well. The US market-based system does not address public-health issues such as addiction and mental health. These societal costs are not addressed at their source but instead are passed along as costs that we all pay through higher medical costs. Consequently we pay very high costs at end of life through critical care services and through the high incarceration rates of individuals who should be treated in public health care facilities rather than institutions.

Furthermore, the Republican mantra of exclusively addressing spending ignores demographics of an older population. Just looking at the size of the population, it is apparent that spending needs to increase to account for the higher costs associated with an older population.

Posted Sun, May 22, 4:37 p.m. Inappropriate

Relax Pythagoras, Mr. Dunphy categorizes the Republicans according to the best local tradition. I read his statement as at least strongly implying that Republicans want to make cuts in an unthoughtful way.

kieth

Login or register to add your voice to the conversation.

Join Crosscut now!
Subscribe to our Newsletter

Follow Us »