The thin 'blanking' blue line

Should Seattle cops be punished for swearing at suspects? Do we really want Nordstrom standards for policing our streets?

Seattle police: not all fun and summer parades.

smohundro, via Flickr

Seattle police: not all fun and summer parades.

My father was a doctor, but he swore like a sailor. Or a lumberjack, and perhaps you can attribute some of it to his summers working in remote logging camps near Neah Bay in the 1930s. He avoided the f-word, but otherwise used a broad vocabulary that was the product of an education courtesy of Yale and Crown-Zellerbach.

My mother got after him about it: She rarely said anything worse than an occasional "damn" and when we heard that, we all knew something really, really bad had happened.

One morning, over breakfast, my mother obtained promises from my dad that he would clean up his language around us kids. He swore he would, then left for work. Moments later, on his way downstairs to the garage, be banged his head on a beam. "Goddamned son-of-a-bitch" and worse resounded through the house, perhaps the shortest duration of a promise on family record.

Despite his cursing being pretty common, it could be intimidating. If my dad howled imprecations at a stubborn nail or piece of wood in his shop, it could be entertaining, like watching Donald Duck fly into a rage. But when the language was directed in our direction, it got our serious attention and quickly put you into "Yes, sir," mode.

Mother was unsuccessful at micromanaging my Dad's language. I can't imagine the Seattle Office of Professional Accountability will be any more successful reigning in the cursing of cops. Three Seattle police officers have been suspended for using profanity while making arrests. 

From news accounts, you have to figure it out for yourself. One said to a suspect, "(blank) my (blank)." Another said "I'm going to break your (blanking) neck." One wonders, was the officer punished for the "blank," or for the threat? Because if it's for the profanity, you're going to have a "blanking" hard time cleaning up the "blanking" potty mouth of every cop who talks "blank."

Another officer who drew a 20-day suspension was reported to have said to a gang banger (a term which seems a little vulgar itself): "I’m going to skull (blank) you and drag you down the street."

If my dad had said this to me, I would have been scared "blankless," but I doubt many gangbangers would be offended at phrases you can hear "bleeped" on Comedy Central from Jon Stewart. Bleeps, by the way, are token nowadays because everyone already knows the words and phrases. They've become part of the joke. So has hyperbole.

The level of shock value increases with the person being addressed and the context. If it's an old lady pulled over for California-stopping a stop sign in Laurelhurst, the threat of a "skull 'blanking'" might be a tad overblown.

Police clearly use heavier weapons depending on the perceived threat to public safety and themselves. Sometimes the heavy verbal guns of vulgarity are a way of intimidating suspects so that real weapons won't have to be used. Or maybe it's a way of letting off steam in a pressure cooker.

I'm not sure the Nordstrom standard of customer service on the streets is always appropriate for the police department.

I also wonder if Seattle really wants a police force that speaks to criminals as if they're issuing an invitation to tea. Assuming you could police the profanity, doesn't the toughness — and the refusal to be intimidated that it can represent — actually provide some comfort for the law-abiding? I certainly liked it when my father's profanity was rolled out in my defense. Message: I "blanking" care.

My own language has evolved over time. I recently talked to a former newspaper colleague about a new editing job he had. He told me it was great. "I can even say 'blank' in the newsroom!" he enthused. Saying "blank" in newsrooms, for fun, for intimidation, or for the utter gratuitousness of it, seems like a right, but as political correctness has slowly squeezed the spontaneity out of many work environments, the roaring guns of profanity have tended to be silenced. I don't think I ever threatened anyone at the Weekly with a "skull 'blanking'" for having missed a deadline, but I have carpet f-bombed a newsroom.

Being out of the newspaper pressure-cooker and talking on live public radio every week, my act is much cleaner these days, though I did say "piss" on KUOW recently and was surprised to find that this word is still one of broadcasting's forbidden ones. Perhaps I have been coarsened by a "skull 'blanking'" culture.

Still, I have to say that while I expect the police be fair, to strive to operate without racism or bias, I also don't expect them to take Miss Manner for a ride-along every day.


About the Author

Knute Berger is Mossback, Crosscut's chief Northwest native. He also writes the monthly Grey Matters column for Seattle magazine and is a weekly Friday guest on Weekday on KUOW-FM (94.9). His newest book is Pugetopolis: A Mossback Takes On Growth Addicts, Weather Wimps, and the Myth of Seattle Nice, published by Sasquatch Books. In 2011, he was named Writer-in-Residence at the Space Needle and is author of Space Needle, The Spirit of Seattle (2012), the official 50th anniversary history of the tower. You can e-mail him at mossback@crosscut.com.

Like what you just read? Support high quality local journalism. Become a member of Crosscut today!

Comments:

Posted Thu, May 26, 9:41 a.m. Inappropriate

Except for the last sentence this article studiously avoids the racial slurs and the violent attacks that often accompany the inoffensive (!) I'm going to break your blanking (blank) neck. What a fine distinction you make when it's the whole attitude we're talking about. Since when is profanity, contempt for a race or ethnic group, and violence visited on a suspect who might be innocent and standing by a requirement of professional police work? Where does letting off steam stop?

Posted Thu, May 26, 10:17 a.m. Inappropriate

Look at the N.B.A. and the recent $100,000 fine levied against Laker player Kobe Bryant and the $50,000 fine levied against Chicago Bull player Joquin Noah for anti-gay slurs against a referee and a fan. The political correctness police are out of control.

animalal

Posted Thu, May 26, 10:54 a.m. Inappropriate

Great piece, Mr. B. I haven't the faintest idea why an earlier poster brought up the subject of fines against a couple of ball players. Those who toil in the world of corporate sports are well-paid for their efforts and the biggest danger any of them face on a day-to-day basis might be an elbow in the face. The least of them are paid many, many times what a policeman earns, and I see no reason why they should be allowed to spew out verbal venom on the court and then be allowed to return to their mansions without some kind of financial punishment. We pay them to entertain us, not to protect us, and I have no problem with holding them to a different standard than I do the police.

TaylorB1

Posted Thu, May 26, 10:57 a.m. Inappropriate

One other thing...it should be made clear that the rules of conduct for police using profanity are vague and can be enforced in a very arbitrary manner. I imagine they were written that way in order to give officers a certain amount of discretion and freedom in their choice of verbal weaponry. Life on the street is not a tea party...and a verbal take-down is much better than one where someone is beat up or shot.

TaylorB1

Posted Thu, May 26, 11 a.m. Inappropriate

I find people who get very quiet and calm in a heated situation to be much more intimidating and scary than people who yell, with or without profanity. Yelling just escalates a situation. Quiet calm puts everyone on alert.

Posted Thu, May 26, 1:24 p.m. Inappropriate

As I see it a cop using the same language as a culprit is the same as rolling in the mud with a pig. I do not think I or a cop should descend to the level of these people.

I wonder what would happen if a cop or two got the ACLU to defend them when they press charges and sue for the culprit harassing them being non PC racial slurs etc etc?

Why is it the cops have a rule book and the bad guys dont?

leitmotif

Posted Thu, May 26, 1:24 p.m. Inappropriate

As I see it a cop using the same language as a culprit is the same as rolling in the mud with a pig. I do not think I or a cop should descend to the level of these people.

I wonder what would happen if a cop or two got the ACLU to defend them when they press charges and sue for the culprit harassing them being non PC racial slurs etc etc?

Why is it the cops have a rule book and the bad guys dont?

leitmotif

Posted Thu, May 26, 2:52 p.m. Inappropriate

Please sir, would you please drop your weapon and put your hand on your head? Alternatively, drop your blankety blank blank weapon and put your blankety blank blank hand on your head.

Which one would a criminal respond to quicker? Violent, coarse language gets the attention of most thugs much quicker that a polite please. When they hear a polite request, they think they have the upper hand. That they, NOT the police control the situation. This is why situations get out of hand and people get hurt. When the thug thinks he has the upper hand, it usually results in the police pulling a weapon and someone being shot. When men refer to their women as b***h and wh**e, they have no understanding of polite talk. Talking politely to them is like talking Swedish to an Italian, they do not connect and it is a foreign language to them.

I know that this is anti PC, but years ago, my father-in-law a Seattle police officer said, when things start to get out of control, always bring your shotgun and hard words, it jars the person you are trying to communicate with and lets them know who is in control. A shotgun and hard words always stopped more trouble than they started. Being polite in a potentially violent situation usually leads to a violent end.

Now, before I am slammed, I would assume that polite talk would emanate from any cop pulling someone over for a traffic violation. The language discussed above is only reserved for thugs and hooligans who do not understand polite language.

Login or register to add your voice to the conversation.

Join Crosscut now!
Subscribe to our Newsletter

Follow Us »